US Navy unveils new long range air-air missile in testing the AIM-424 Malice

Facts > feelings.

First of all, US already had R-37M equivalent. It was called AIM54.

This is clearly very agile design meant for fighters and AWACS alike.


At 4.11 meters in length, this means it can't fit into the F-35B's weapons bay.

Secondly, here's the photo of it is being literally mounted inside F-35's weapon bay.

1787470967129.png

If your feeling didn't made you rushing to comment, you probably would have seen that.
 
First of all, US already had R-37M equivalent. It was called AIM54.

This is clearly very agile design meant for fighters and AWACS alike.




Secondly, here's the photo of it is being literally mounted inside F-35's weapon bay.

View attachment 212036

If your feeling didn't made you rushing to comment, you probably would have seen that.
learly, you haven't actually looked up the data. The AIM-54 is vastly different from these two missiles in terms of weight and range, not to mention that it's a retired missile. What's even stranger is that you seem unaware that the F-35B's weapons bay is significantly smaller than the F-35C's. In fact, the TWZ report specifically emphasized that the aircraft capable of employing this weapon is the F-35C. Please update your knowledge base.
 
learly, you haven't actually looked up the data. The AIM-54 is vastly different from these two missiles in terms of weight and range, not to mention that it's a retired missile.

While they do differ in weight and ranges, AIM-54 was meant to shoot down soviet bombers at long ranges just like R-37M is meant to shoot down AWACS and tankers at long ranges. Conceptually they were similar.
 
While they do differ in weight and ranges, AIM-54 was meant to shoot down soviet bombers at long ranges just like R-37M is meant to shoot down AWACS and tankers at long ranges. Conceptually they were similar.
However, the AIM-424 weighs 680 kg, which is far heavier than the R-37M. I don't see anything particularly flexible or special about this missile.
 
Obviously, physical data matters more than fantasy.
the 424 is only about a foo longer them the 120 but 50% thicker. this is done to the missile can fit into the f35/22.

the f47 will certainly have a longer weapons bay to accommodate future longer,bigger variants.

its approximately as long as the pl-15 but not as thick range easily 400km

i expect china to counter this too by increasing the diameter of the pl15 or have a new variant entirely.
 
aim-424 is meant for fighter size targets not just awacs. The aim-174b/sm6 is longer, thicker and way heavier but it's meant to destroy highly maneuverable targets like subsonic/supersonic cruise and antiship missiles including incoming ballistic missiles warheads. Raytheon already posted the aim-424 has a 463km range which means its real range is much greater than 500km.
 
What is the significance of the 424 in the name?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top