huanghong
Registered Member
Facts > feelings.Nice cope but no.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Facts > feelings.Nice cope but no.
Facts > feelings.
At 4.11 meters in length, this means it can't fit into the F-35B's weapons bay.

learly, you haven't actually looked up the data. The AIM-54 is vastly different from these two missiles in terms of weight and range, not to mention that it's a retired missile. What's even stranger is that you seem unaware that the F-35B's weapons bay is significantly smaller than the F-35C's. In fact, the TWZ report specifically emphasized that the aircraft capable of employing this weapon is the F-35C. Please update your knowledge base.First of all, US already had R-37M equivalent. It was called AIM54.
This is clearly very agile design meant for fighters and AWACS alike.
Secondly, here's the photo of it is being literally mounted inside F-35's weapon bay.
View attachment 212036
If your feeling didn't made you rushing to comment, you probably would have seen that.
learly, you haven't actually looked up the data. The AIM-54 is vastly different from these two missiles in terms of weight and range, not to mention that it's a retired missile.
However, the AIM-424 weighs 680 kg, which is far heavier than the R-37M. I don't see anything particularly flexible or special about this missile.While they do differ in weight and ranges, AIM-54 was meant to shoot down soviet bombers at long ranges just like R-37M is meant to shoot down AWACS and tankers at long ranges. Conceptually they were similar.
I don't see anything particularly flexible or special about this missile.
Obviously, physical data matters more than fantasy.You don't have to.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.