Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

I have clearly stated in my previous post that I don't think that Iran will be able to sink it due of lacking the hyper explosive warheads.

However, to damage the catapults on the flight deck to incapacitate the supercarrier could be achievable if the supercarrier is getting too close to the Iranian coast.
Okay that I can definitely agree with you on.

But you also have to remember that there's a carrier group surrounding it to help deflect anything going on...

It's not 100% foolproof, but it definitely helps a lot
 
I have clearly stated in my previous post that I don't think that Iran will be able to sink it due of lacking the hyper explosive warheads.

However, to damage the catapults on the flight deck to incapacitate the supercarrier could be achievable if the supercarrier is getting too close to the Iranian coast.
There is no need for any US carrier to get within range of Iranian missiles. The aerial refueling capacity currently in theater is more than sufficient to support any carrier-launched strike package all the way into the target(s) and back.

All of the reports to date of Iranian missile hits on US carriers have been figments of some people's very active imaginations. Numerous photos of the carriers have confirmed that.
 
Okay that I can definitely agree with you on.

But you also have to remember that there's a carrier group surrounding it to help deflect anything going on...

It's not 100% foolproof, but it definitely helps a lot

The salvo launch of ASBM will have few being missed by the interceptors.

It seems the ASBM and hypersonic missiles are still expensive and scarce for Iran, therefore they would squander it like the salvo launch.
 
If the US naval ships keep staying from 1000 km away from Iran's coast, they would not be able to strike deep into Iran.

Also, Iran's navy was not really the main focus as their missile troops.

Whereas the USN is the main focus for the US military.

Iran seems to lack the high explosive warhead to sink a supercarrier with few shots, but to damage the catapults on the flight deck could also render a supercarrier useless.

And the supercarriers still represent the US symbol of might, and they are going to lose all their face if it got hit by Iran.

Then why aircraft carriers avoid Bab el mandeb strait since Iran war started? Circling whole Africa.

If Houthi can sink a aircraft carrier sailing near to them, what can't do Iran? The key is distance to shore. I dont know if 1000 km, 100km or 10km. But USA aircraft carriers didnt dare to sail Bab el Mandeb since Iran war started. So if they think Houthi could be a problem, much more it would be Iran.

Here you has aircraft carrier USS George Bush, months ago, circling Africa, to avoid Bab el mandeb strait.




FT_4_6_26-1-1536x861.jpg


FT_4_13_26-1536x861.jpg


FT_4_20_26-1-1536x861.jpg
 
Last edited:
Israel is a threat to Pakistan. You don’t have the historical context unfortunately.

Eg Israel tried to bomb Kahuta.

And incentive right now will be higher, because Pakistán would eventually assist Saudis or Turkey in case of Israelí attack, including nuclear deterrence.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top