Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

shapurzolaktaf said:
Same will happen if Iran suffers a nuclear attack. Iran should at least possess 1000 nuclear bombs and second strike options (by nuclear powered submarines).
Click to expand...
Where is Iran going to get 1000 nuclear bombs and nuclear subs in such a short time?
 
Champion said:
If war comes then so be it.



How can one not be emotional when Iran just suffered its greatest embarrassment in recent history? Unfortunately "cooler heads" have lead to Iranian personnel both military and now diplomatic, being targeted with utter impunity.

I hope you realize doing nothing or responding with meager verbal threats and grandiose claims of "revenge" will only work to further undermine Iran's regional/geopolitical standing as other nations will start to see the IRI as more of a paper-tiger rather than a country to be respected.

This was not, in anyway, a good thing for Iran. It wasn't even a operational hazard. Zionists went above and beyond normal international conventions going after another nations diplomatic mission (illegal by global statutes, flagrant act of war). Many conflicts started over less but I guess Iran still relies on "muh strategic patience" nonsense cause it makes certain die-hards feel better when coping with a cruel reality...
Click to expand...
Its Ok for you to be emotional. What is not ok is to expect that our decision makers make decisions based on our emotions. Ayatollah Khamenei has already stated that Iran will respond but when and where and the scope of that response has to be done carefully and at the right time. We can not expect Iran to respond right away. We do not have the full picture of what is happening in this conflict and we should not expect Iran to respond in a time and manner that makes us feel good! Israel knew what it was doing when it attacked the Consulate and most likely they are in a heightened state to respond to imminent Iranian action. We must be patient and leave the where and when up to those who have the intelligence to know what that that is!
 
Kyussis said:
Where is Iran going to get 1000 nuclear bombs and nuclear subs in such a short time?
Click to expand...
Not in short term... It's s strategic and long term process which we should carry out. But Iran should at least create 5-10 bombs in short term.
 
What ever action Iran does take, the enemy (both foreign and domestic) will do its best to turn it around and make Iran to be the bad guy by playing down any damage that Iran inflicts as being week and just merely killing innocent civilians. Up to know both Iran and the resistance has been careful not to steal the spotlight from the suffering in Gaza and the worst thing that can happen now is if the worlds attention goes to a conflict with Iran.
 
shapurzolaktaf said:
Not in short term... It's s strategic and long term process which we should carry out. But Iran should at least create 5-10 bombs in short term.
Click to expand...
This is the worst possible time to formalize nukes.
 
shapurzolaktaf said:
Not in short term... It's s strategic and long term process which we should carry out. But Iran should at least create 5-10 bombs in short term.
Click to expand...
What good is 5-10 bombs in the "Short term" if Israel nukes Iran in response to Iran's retaliation?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Immortals said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Isn't it the same media that said that 7th october was an Iranian plan and that Iran bombed Zahedan with Su-22s? (with anonymous sources as they always do)
 
List of fake news posted here since 01/04

- Iran struck an American ship
- Iran silos are preparing for a massive attack
- All the anonymous sources bullshit and WSJ that is known for spreading fakes and claims under the guise of "staying anonymous"
- IRGC has a Telegram channel and said they are about to strike

- These have not even been spread by random people but so called "expert OSINT" with thousands of viewers being trapped while being comfortably installed on their sofas

The last thing anybody wants here are fake news and anonymous sources claims
 
tsunset said:
Isn't it the same media that said that 7th october was an Iranian plan and that Iran bombed Zahedan with Su-22s? (with anonymous sources as they always do)
Click to expand...

I don’t recall WSJ ever saying 10/7 was an Iranian plot. WSJ released anon US and Israeli officials saying they didn’t see indications of direct Iranian involvement in the days after. You maybe confusing NY Post with WSJ.

And Iran bombing Zahedan with SU-22 was a claim by Babak T.
 
Kyussis said:
What good is 5-10 bombs in the "Short term" if Israel nukes Iran in response to Iran's retaliation?
Click to expand...

No way on earth Israel can nuke Iran. Israel will never want to involve itself in nuclear war because of a simple reason that is its tiny size. Even 5-10 nukes is enough to severely damage the only jewish country of the world. So, they don't want nuclear war.

Israel's benefit / advantage is in tactical war with modern air warfare. They have modern airforce and modern air defense. They don't need to go to nuclear. So don't worry on nukes and don't be so much frightened of Israel. Iran MUST give a befitting response to the latest attack otherwise it will become a new normal.
 
Awwad said:
No way on earth Israel can nuke Iran. Israel will never want to involve itself in nuclear war because of a simple reason that is its tiny size.
Click to expand...

To many Hollywood movie watchers on here who think nukes can be used haphazardly whenever a country is in the mood.

Even when Israel was at risk of being overrun by the Arabs in the Arab-Israeli wars they didn’t use any nukes. It was hotly debated at the time if they would even use nukes if Arabs broke thru defenses and took control of Jerusalem.

Now suddenly they are going to use nukes in a conventional skirmish against Iran in 2024?

Facts are no country has used nuclear weapons in over 75 years. There is a reason for that.
 
Immortals said:
I don’t recall WSJ ever saying 10/7 was an Iranian plot. WSJ released anon US and Israeli officials saying they didn’t see indications of direct Iranian involvement in the days after. You maybe confusing NY Post with WSJ.

And Iran bombing Zahedan with SU-22 was a claim by Babak T.
Click to expand...



Debunk by LeMonde (pro west outlet) https://www.lemonde.fr/en/internati...-help-hamas-plan-israel-attack_6159464_4.html
quoting senior Hamas and Hezbollah (Lebanon's Iran-backed Shiite militant group) officials, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Click to expand...

All of which have been debunked by intelligence services, and all of which relies on anonymous sources

This is still very alarming that tens of thousands of people relayed this and even still believes in them

I'm not targeting you brother but the WSJ is criticized exactly for this, this is a plague among some medias https://newsliteracymatters.com/2019/09/30/q-why-are-journalists-allowed-to-use-anonymous-sources/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top