Breaking News: Yemen's Houthis strike Saudi Arabia's Abha airport with missiles and drones in a sharp escalation

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

Another grand argument offered by the so-called educated minds here is that, once all this turmoil has run its course, this will be the only country left standing, while the rest of the region will crumble and the map of the Middle East will be redrawn.

 

[Corax]

Where the F did the british come into this argument from? We were talking about the Houthis, Saudi Arabia and Iran also add israel. I asked what Iran gets out of having an armed group on KSA’s border, and suddenly you are talking about who the British created.

Stick to the point for once.

This guy has serious mental health and cognition issues he twists things beyond belief, and then accuses others of attacking him. He has a fragile ego and doesn't like anyone "disliking" his comments or disagreeing with him, be careful, otherwise he'll trawl through your entire post history and "dislike" each and every one of them!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

Let us take these arguments apart, one by one. First, you say Syria was simply the product of foreign manipulation—CIA, Turks, and the so-called “Zionists”—as though the Syrians themselves had no grievance worth mentioning. Yet the uprising began amid the wider Arab Spring, with Syrians protesting Assad’s rule; foreign powers subsequently poured money, weapons and fighters into what had begun as a domestic uprising.

But even if I were to grant your entire argument for the sake of discussion, would that not merely expose the narrowness of the argument itself? Whether the man in Damascus was Bashar al-Assad or is now Jolani, the larger question remains remarkably simple: after all the foreign powers, factions and grand geopolitical manoeuvring, where is the ordinary Syrian’s genuine freedom to choose his own leadership? And, for that matter, where is ours?

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

@F.O.X

since, you intend to continue trolling and because of that deluded A** H**E (CORAX) interrupting, I will hold my replies for now!

ping me back, when you are ready for serious discussion

 

[maxpane]

And for those Pakistanis who were calling this a false flag, the Pakistani government has now officially issued a press release condemning the Houthi militia’s drone attack on Makkah.

Houthis are doing israel work here and it can ignite a long religious war. What iran wnts to achieve by allowing that ?

 

[F.O.X]

Let us take these arguments apart, one by one. First, you say Syria was simply the product of foreign manipulation—CIA, Turks, and the so-called “Zionists”—as though the Syrians themselves had no grievance worth mentioning. Yet the uprising began amid the wider Arab Spring, with Syrians protesting Assad’s rule; foreign powers subsequently poured money, weapons and fighters into what had begun as a domestic uprising.

But even if I were to grant your entire argument for the sake of discussion, would that not merely expose the narrowness of the argument itself? Whether the man in Damascus was Bashar al-Assad or is now Jolani, the larger question remains remarkably simple: after all the foreign powers, factions and grand geopolitical manoeuvring, where is the ordinary Syrian’s genuine freedom to choose his own leadership? And, for that matter, where is ours?

If you need ChatGPT to write your argument, at least read it before posting. Remove the long dashes too. They make it even easier to spot.

I never said the Syrian uprising was created by the CIA, Turkey or anyone else. You invented that, then wrote two paragraphs arguing with yourself.

What I said was simple... Iran helped Assad while his forces starved and bombed Syrians. You say Syrians should choose their own leaders? Good. Then why are you defending the people who helped Assad stop them?


I have a feeling I am arguing with a 11 year old.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

If you need ChatGPT to write your argument, at least read it before posting. Remove the long dashes too. They make it even easier to spot.

I never said the Syrian uprising was created by the CIA, Turkey or anyone else. You invented that, then wrote two paragraphs arguing with yourself.

What I said was simple... Iran helped Assad while his forces starved and bombed Syrians. You say Syrians should choose their own leaders? Good. Then why are you defending the people who helped Assad stop them?


I have a feeling I am arguing with a 11 year old.

I cant argue write now, this user, attacks me personally

trolls my posts..then If I reply mod attack me without seeing through this user corax, trolls my anywhere he goes!


and no, why would you say that, CIA was behind the uprising bec, your POV is scetarian!(When in actuality you should have!)


re. AI, my choice, do you have any problem or am i under you command?!!
i will write the way it suits

you do your job, kill my argument logically!



sectarian POV, conveniently, misses key details, only to take advantage and to put all the blame on others!