Breaking News: Yemen's Houthis strike Saudi Arabia's Abha airport with missiles and drones in a sharp escalation

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Please enlighten me which of my paragraphs were hard enough for you to understand. I will try to write it in easy english.

why should I accept your POV, please prove with these actions zios have become less stronger!

 

[F.O.X]

secondly, IR does not benefit.. as IR has nothing gained financially or politically.

zios benefit who have now proved a reason for US bases in the region!

which will now become zios bases.

now problem with you is, that, the moment I say zios, you will argue IR is also majoosi, zios supporter!


please, give me a break!

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

 

[F.O.X]

why should I accept your POV, please prove with these actions zios have become less stronger!

View attachment 215691

when was the last time iran attacked zios ?

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

please be clear, what are you arguing, IR benefits?!!

who attacked houthis first?

which country was made by the British, which country serves the British?!!

British here mean, zios!

I will write a detailed reply, only a starter, wait for an hour!

 

[F.O.X]

why should I accept your POV, please prove with these actions zios have become less stronger!

View attachment 215691

also please enlighten what were the difficult words in the above attached image of my post ?

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

when was the last time iran attacked zios ?

WTF are you on about, why should IR attack zios when you have so many so muslims around it?!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

also please enlighten what were the difficult words in the above attached image of my post ?

very sectarian obscure POV!

 

[F.O.X]

please be clear, what are you arguing, IR benefits?!!

who attacked houthis first?

which country was made by the British, which country serves the British?!!

British here mean, zios!

I will write a detailed reply, only a starter, wait for an hour!

Where the F did the british come into this argument from? We were talking about the Houthis, Saudi Arabia and Iran also add israel. I asked what Iran gets out of having an armed group on KSA’s border, and suddenly you are talking about who the British created.

Stick to the point for once.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Where the F did the british come into this argument from? We were talking about the Houthis, Saudi Arabia and Iran also add israel. I asked what Iran gets out of having an armed group on KSA’s border, and suddenly you are talking about who the British created.

Stick to the point for once.

why not, who are you to say, any historical point in the discussion will be set by you!

what am I to, a fool?!!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Where the F did the british come into this argument from? We were talking about the Houthis, Saudi Arabia and Iran also add israel. I asked what Iran gets out of having an armed group on KSA’s border, and suddenly you are talking about who the British created.

Stick to the point for once.

why shouldnt british/zios be part of the discussion?!! why?!!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

@F.O.X

you lost my respect, now, here onwards, expect the same trolling!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

Let me lay out the shape of your argument, point by point, so that you may see it plainly:

1. It is a majoosi kafir country; it supported Syria’s dictator, backed Hezbollah, and inflicted great suffering upon the Arabs there—therefore, it is deemed an enemy of Muslims.
2. It is an enemy of Muslims because it has carried out attacks against Saudi Arabia and other Arab states.
3. It is a non-Muslim state because it has enabled the Houthis to carry out attacks against Saudi Arabia.
4. And it is a non-Muslim state because it weakens a Muslim country.

This sums up all your arguments!

and one more argument,


5. IR is using Houthis to attack KSA

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

Another grand argument offered by the so-called educated minds here is that, once all this turmoil has run its course, this will be the only country left standing, while the rest of the region will crumble and the map of the Middle East will be redrawn.

 

[Corax]

Where the F did the british come into this argument from? We were talking about the Houthis, Saudi Arabia and Iran also add israel. I asked what Iran gets out of having an armed group on KSA’s border, and suddenly you are talking about who the British created.

Stick to the point for once.

This guy has serious mental health and cognition issues he twists things beyond belief, and then accuses others of attacking him. He has a fragile ego and doesn't like anyone "disliking" his comments or disagreeing with him, be careful, otherwise he'll trawl through your entire post history and "dislike" each and every one of them!

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

I said iiran benefits from having an armed group on Saudi Arabia’s border. You replied that Iran made no money. since when does a country need to make a profit for a strategy to serve its interests ?

& if the US now has another reason to keep bases in the region, who do you think is responsible for that ? . Both sides can use the same conflict for their own purposes while Yemen pays the price.

ss for the rest, you have invented my next argument and then got angry at me for it. I never called Iranians "majoosi" or said Iran supports Israel.

Please give me a break and reply to what I actually wrote.

Let us take these arguments apart, one by one. First, you say Syria was simply the product of foreign manipulation—CIA, Turks, and the so-called “Zionists”—as though the Syrians themselves had no grievance worth mentioning. Yet the uprising began amid the wider Arab Spring, with Syrians protesting Assad’s rule; foreign powers subsequently poured money, weapons and fighters into what had begun as a domestic uprising.

But even if I were to grant your entire argument for the sake of discussion, would that not merely expose the narrowness of the argument itself? Whether the man in Damascus was Bashar al-Assad or is now Jolani, the larger question remains remarkably simple: after all the foreign powers, factions and grand geopolitical manoeuvring, where is the ordinary Syrian’s genuine freedom to choose his own leadership? And, for that matter, where is ours?