‘I want to cry’: Afghan medical students in Pakistan face expulsion fear

Imagine going to the USA, UK, or Australia on a student visa, and before you can finish your degree, the government decides to deport you over some weak or unfair excuse. How would that feel?

I personally think that in Pakistan, we often let ethnic divisions shape how we treat one another. We assume we’re better than others, and we struggle to show compassion yet we expect compassion when we are the ones in need.

Some of you may not agree with me but I believe that educated Afghans should be given long‑term visas so they can integrate into Pakistani society and culture instead of being isolated. Supporting their integration would benefit both them and us.

If it was up to me, I would have given these Afghan students temporary visas so they could complete their degrees. Charge them international student fees if necessary, but at least allow them to finish their education.
Educated Afghan are even worse enemies of Pakistan... Preaching morality is the easiest job in the world , it has no competition.
 
Educated Afghan are even worse enemies of Pakistan... Preaching morality is the easiest job in the world , it has no competition.

I’ve addressed every point, even giving the example of Bengali‑speaking Pakistanis who have lived in Karachi’s slums for more than 50 years but were denied NICs because the government chose not to recognize them. Despite decades in Pakistan, the state has failed to acknowledge their existence. To me, this reflects a feudal mindset, one that treats certain communities as inherently lower class. When a government alienates its own long standing residents, it’s unrealistic to expect fair treatment toward anyone else.
I haven’t mentioned about Biharis living in refugee camps in Bangladesh that Pakistani government failed to bring them
 
I’ve addressed every point, even giving the example of Bengali‑speaking Pakistanis who have lived in Karachi’s slums for more than 50 years but were denied NICs because the government chose not to recognize them. Despite decades in Pakistan, the state has failed to acknowledge their existence. To me, this reflects a feudal mindset, one that treats certain communities as inherently lower class. When a government alienates its own long standing residents, it’s unrealistic to expect fair treatment toward anyone else.
I haven’t mentioned about Biharis living in refugee camps in Bangladesh that Pakistani government failed to bring them

big difference between afghans and any bengali/biharis.
BIG difference
Can't be considered equal. One are unwanted refugees from war.

the others should be naturalized and given CNIC(Bengali Pakistanis and Biharis)

afghans can go to india or wherever, WHY are they coming here? WHY? Whats their obsession with coming to Pak using whatever. They can **** off to india.

Sorry bud, doesn't matter our own issues, but those afghans cannot be tolerated anymore, the consensus is obvious and you ain't able to change that. The nation is sick and tired of those tribal dumb savages who want to come and invade us.

No sympathies anymore given their hatred and their terrorism against innocent Pakistani civilians and law enforcement. Time to smoke the talibunnies and their supporters
 
You keep dodging the issue
This is everything but the issue
All the drugs, refugees, militants, contraband, and weapons are smuggled into Pakistan from Afghanistan with the participation of the army, police
It's been a slow few years, hopefully operations pick up
Your focus on cursing

Never cursed,I take no personal satisfaction in personal predicaments

I have NO compulsion to make this my personal charity case, because you start charity in your own family.
 
Educated Afghan are even worse enemies of Pakistan... Preaching morality is the easiest job in the world , it has no competition.
Liberal afghans support the Taliban, in the West

Meanwhile actual Afghans regress to the iron age

This is the death spiral of hyper tribalism


They are very close to the Iranian monarchists, they choose being consumed by hate actively, though I suppose some were driven out so perhaps it's understandable, however they atleast cherish education and being productive members of society,
 
big difference between afghans and any bengali/biharis.
BIG difference
Can't be considered equal. One are unwanted refugees from war.

the others should be naturalized and given CNIC(Bengali Pakistanis and Biharis)

afghans can go to india or wherever, WHY are they coming here? WHY? Whats their obsession with coming to Pak using whatever. They can **** off to india.

Sorry bud, doesn't matter our own issues, but those afghans cannot be tolerated anymore, the consensus is obvious and you ain't able to change that. The nation is sick and tired of those tribal dumb savages who want to come and invade us.

No sympathies anymore given their hatred and their terrorism against innocent Pakistani civilians and law enforcement. Time to smoke the talibunnies and their supporters

Your argument collapses the moment history enters the room.

You call Afghans “invaders” and “unwanted refugees,” but conveniently forget that Pakistan hosted Afghan refugees for decades with substantial international financial and humanitarian support.

You remember the refugees.

You forget the war, geopolitics, foreign funding, and Pakistan’s own role in Afghanistan.

That selective memory makes serious debate exhausting.

Pakistan was not a helpless bystander. Its establishment played a major role in Afghanistan’s geopolitical and militant landscape for decades. Whatever justification existed for those policies, they had consequences.

You cannot help shape a regional crisis and then pretend its consequences arrived from nowhere.

And stop confusing Afghans with militants.

A terrorist is not an ethnicity.
A criminal is not a nationality.
A militant organization does not represent every Afghan civilian.

If someone commits a crime, prosecute them. If someone is a security threat, deal with them. But blaming millions of civilians for the actions of individuals is not national security.

It is collective prejudice.

Then comes the hypocrisy.

You demand justice for Bengalis, Biharis, or other marginalized communities while arguing that an entirely different ethnic group should be treated as inherently unwelcome.

What is the principle?

If citizenship, documentation, security, residency, and contribution matter, apply those standards consistently.

If ethnicity determines who deserves dignity, then stop pretending this is about principle.

And yes, Pakistan has every right to control its borders. It has every right to deport people who have no legal right to remain. It has every right to protect its citizens.

But border control does not require ethnic hatred.

That distinction matters.

What is especially exhausting is debating people with selective memory, people who remember every fact that supports their argument and conveniently forget everything that complicates it.

They remember terrorism but forget geopolitics.

They remember refugees but forget the wars.

They remember the economic burden but forget international assistance.

They remember crimes committed by individuals but forget the millions who committed none.

History isn’t a menu where you choose only the facts you like.

Pakistan needs a serious refugee and immigration policy based on law, security, documentation, economics, and humanity.

Not ethnic scapegoating.

Not historical amnesia.

Not social-media nationalism.

If your argument only works after history has been selectively edited, the problem isn’t history.

The problem is your argument.

Also, don’t forget that Pakistan sent thousands of Sindhis as Afghan refugees to Saudi Arabia during Soviet war. As a result, there is a beggar mafia from Sindh in Saudi Arabia.

I will continue to open history books and give you facts that you cannot deny.
 
Last edited:
Your argument collapses the moment history enters the room.

You call Afghans “invaders” and “unwanted refugees,” but conveniently forget that Pakistan hosted Afghan refugees for decades with substantial international financial and humanitarian support.

You remember the refugees.

You forget the war, geopolitics, foreign funding, and Pakistan’s own role in Afghanistan.

That selective memory makes serious debate exhausting.

Pakistan was not a helpless bystander. Its establishment played a major role in Afghanistan’s geopolitical and militant landscape for decades. Whatever justification existed for those policies, they had consequences.

You cannot help shape a regional crisis and then pretend its consequences arrived from nowhere.

And stop confusing Afghans with militants.

A terrorist is not an ethnicity.
A criminal is not a nationality.
A militant organization does not represent every Afghan civilian.

If someone commits a crime, prosecute them. If someone is a security threat, deal with them. But blaming millions of civilians for the actions of individuals is not national security.

It is collective prejudice.

Then comes the hypocrisy.

You demand justice for Bengalis, Biharis, or other marginalized communities while arguing that an entirely different ethnic group should be treated as inherently unwelcome.

What is the principle?

If citizenship, documentation, security, residency, and contribution matter, apply those standards consistently.

If ethnicity determines who deserves dignity, then stop pretending this is about principle.

And yes, Pakistan has every right to control its borders. It has every right to deport people who have no legal right to remain. It has every right to protect its citizens.

But border control does not require ethnic hatred.

That distinction matters.

What is especially exhausting is debating people with selective memory, people who remember every fact that supports their argument and conveniently forget everything that complicates it.

They remember terrorism but forget geopolitics.

They remember refugees but forget the wars.

They remember the economic burden but forget international assistance.

They remember crimes committed by individuals but forget the millions who committed none.

History isn’t a menu where you choose only the facts you like.

Pakistan needs a serious refugee and immigration policy based on law, security, documentation, economics, and humanity.

Not ethnic scapegoating.

Not historical amnesia.

Not social-media nationalism.

If your argument only works after history has been selectively edited, the problem isn’t history.

The problem is your argument.

Also, don’t forget that Pakistan sent thousands of Sindhis as Afghan refugees to Saudi Arabia during Soviet war. As a result, there is a beggar mafia from Sindh in Saudi Arabia.

I will continue to open history books and give you facts that you cannot deny.
Yes. Amnesia is a problem.

Have you forgotten the reason this thread was opened?

Afghans were - so it seems - ungrateful for the educational assistance given to them by Pakistan.

A country that BARS females from becoming doctors has the luxury of sending males and females here for their studies. Half of those qualified doctors would return to help Afghans. Half would have to practice medicine abroad one day but would still then send huge remittances home to Afghanistan.

I don't know what is actually wrong with you that you spout Bharati gibberish that somehow Pakistan "created Talibs saar to occupy Kabul saar!". For decades, we have actually done everything to help these clowns achieve independence and freedom while also funding their development.


This was done in our interests as much as in theirs, i.e. to enhance ties with an immediate neighbour with whom a positive trading relationship may endure.

This strategy failed, not because we behaved with some hostility towards them or harmed them in some way, but simply because the arrogant pashtun ethnosupremacists thought they were better than us and could simply demand our territory.

Let me know when your amnesia is cured.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top