big difference between afghans and any bengali/biharis.
BIG difference
Can't be considered equal. One are unwanted refugees from war.
the others should be naturalized and given CNIC(Bengali Pakistanis and Biharis)
afghans can go to india or wherever, WHY are they coming here? WHY? Whats their obsession with coming to Pak using whatever. They can **** off to india.
Sorry bud, doesn't matter our own issues, but those afghans cannot be tolerated anymore, the consensus is obvious and you ain't able to change that. The nation is sick and tired of those tribal dumb savages who want to come and invade us.
No sympathies anymore given their hatred and their terrorism against innocent Pakistani civilians and law enforcement. Time to smoke the talibunnies and their supporters
Your argument collapses the moment history enters the room.
You call Afghans “invaders” and “unwanted refugees,” but conveniently forget that Pakistan hosted Afghan refugees for decades with substantial international financial and humanitarian support.
You remember the refugees.
You forget the war, geopolitics, foreign funding, and Pakistan’s own role in Afghanistan.
That selective memory makes serious debate exhausting.
Pakistan was not a helpless bystander. Its establishment played a major role in Afghanistan’s geopolitical and militant landscape for decades. Whatever justification existed for those policies, they had consequences.
You cannot help shape a regional crisis and then pretend its consequences arrived from nowhere.
And stop confusing Afghans with militants.
A terrorist is not an ethnicity.
A criminal is not a nationality.
A militant organization does not represent every Afghan civilian.
If someone commits a crime, prosecute them. If someone is a security threat, deal with them. But blaming millions of civilians for the actions of individuals is not national security.
It is collective prejudice.
Then comes the hypocrisy.
You demand justice for Bengalis, Biharis, or other marginalized communities while arguing that an entirely different ethnic group should be treated as inherently unwelcome.
What is the principle?
If citizenship, documentation, security, residency, and contribution matter, apply those standards consistently.
If ethnicity determines who deserves dignity, then stop pretending this is about principle.
And yes, Pakistan has every right to control its borders. It has every right to deport people who have no legal right to remain. It has every right to protect its citizens.
But border control does not require ethnic hatred.
That distinction matters.
What is especially exhausting is debating people with selective memory, people who remember every fact that supports their argument and conveniently forget everything that complicates it.
They remember terrorism but forget geopolitics.
They remember refugees but forget the wars.
They remember the economic burden but forget international assistance.
They remember crimes committed by individuals but forget the millions who committed none.
History isn’t a menu where you choose only the facts you like.
Pakistan needs a serious refugee and immigration policy based on law, security, documentation, economics, and humanity.
Not ethnic scapegoating.
Not historical amnesia.
Not social-media nationalism.
If your argument only works after history has been selectively edited, the problem isn’t history.
The problem is your argument.
Also, don’t forget that Pakistan sent thousands of Sindhis as Afghan refugees to Saudi Arabia during Soviet war. As a result, there is a beggar mafia from Sindh in Saudi Arabia.
I will continue to open history books and give you facts that you cannot deny.