IMF wants Pakistan to make 174 legislative changes under ongoing loan programmes

hydrabadi_arab

Trusted Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
7,617
Reaction score
14,434
Reputation
5,622.3
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
The Pakistan government is preparing to place the proposed 174 amendments to various laws sought by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as part of reforms under its ongoing $7 billion Extended Fund Facility (EFF) and $1.4 billion Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF), Finance Secretary Imdadullah Bosal told the National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue, chaired by Syed Naveed Qamar.

“There are a total of 174 amendments the IMF wants to be passed,” Bosal said, adding that the government was working on the amendments and had made it clear to the IMF that while the proposals would be presented to parliament, their approval remained parliament’s prerogative.

The proposed reforms span areas including financial-sector governance, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), remittances and climate-related measures.


The discussion comes as an IMF staff mission is in Pakistan for programme reviews. Formal negotiations for the fourth review of the $7 billion EFF and the third review of the RSF are set to begin on Monday. Around $4.5 billion has so far been disbursed by the IMF, while three programme reviews have been completed.

Changes to the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) law are also under discussion. The fund covers five major blue-chip companies, including Oil and Gas Development Company Limited (OGDCL) and Pakistan State Oil (PSO), with governance and financial reporting standards among the issues being considered.

The government is also discussing remittances with the IMF. Bosal said costly payment-system impediments needed to be addressed, while the Fund had strongly opposed subsidies used to facilitate remittances. Such subsidies, which had previously exceeded Rs120 billion, have already been withdrawn.

Sugar-sector liberalisation is another benchmark under discussion. The federal government has circulated a draft policy, with three provinces agreeing to it while one has raised reservations that remain to be addressed.


The committee also questioned the government's strategy for power distribution companies (Discos), particularly the future of loss-making entities if profitable companies are privatised.

Members stressed that IMF-related reforms should not be assessed solely on compliance with programme benchmarks, but also on whether they produced measurable economic and social outcomes.

The committee sought clearer timelines for outstanding commitments and information on the impact of reforms on citizens, businesses and taxpayers. It also called for fiscal consolidation to be accompanied by measures supporting investment, exports, employment and sustainable economic growth.

Programme commitments discussed before the committee include parliamentary consideration of supplementary expenditure beyond approved budgets, restrictions on new tax amnesties and preferential tax treatment, energy-sector reforms and implementation of the National Fiscal Pact with the provinces.
 
So no end to corruption and money laundering and misuse of taxpayers monies?

When will IMF scrutinize the corrupt rulers and their wastage of public funds?
 
Wow, IMF officials are effectively dictating Pakistan’s laws, "parliament’s prerogative" sounds like a euphemism for rubber stamping. Might as well ask the British to come back.
 
Wow, IMF officials are effectively dictating Pakistan’s laws, "parliament’s prerogative" sounds like a euphemism for rubber stamping. Might as well ask the British

Maybe Arab or Turks. They have a pact too or wait for some Afghan refugee with Pakistani papers to become either Minister of War or Minister of Lagaan.
 
As long as the current paradigm prevails... there is simply no way to mend ways. The government doesn't run on Pakistani people, their efforts or wealth... instead it runs on mortgaging the state to foreign finance... the people merely help keep the balance of payments...
Because reality would bite... make them do the needful... return power to the people... let go of the bloated bureaucracy, graft and a parasitic elite hell bent on submission to the overlords.
 
... at this stage, I'm not opposed to giving this territory back to the British; at least there was justice among the public along with bureaucratic and infrastructural stability.
 
A strong economy is the prerequisite for you to solve problems and have everything. However, for Pakistan ......
 
... at this stage, I'm not opposed to giving this territory back to the British; at least there was justice among the public along with bureaucratic and infrastructural stability.
There wasnt.

However, the problem was you replaced one elite with another elite.
It was after all, an elite (with educated middle class representation as its core machinery) that led the Pakistan movement.

The problem is that this elite also INHERITED the mentality of the British "elite" in that they were basically governing the land for exploitation of resources to take outside - leaving token enough to run the dominion.

What has changed in that approach today?
Nothing.

Elite capture btw - is actually pretty "durable" in surviving but the problem with this elite is that they actually have not found a true "bargain" amongst each other to keep the state going. This might seem contradictory to the idea of an "establishment" but basically they are consistently looking for short term gains to stop reforms if it means their share is threatened but when it comes time for responsibility - to echo Ayub Khan "I will not be responsible for the destruction of Pakistan"(Even after it was his racist policies that led to inflaming EP) no one wants to own it.

So what happens then is that this loose elite "boardroom" consistently plays external financing - then uses it to enable its own access at the expense of actually trying to nurture a workforce that can sustain the country(more babies does not equal a productive workforce) and at the end because institutions(army, bureaucracy) are part of the elite - it weakens institutions ability for accountability and improvement.
 
These are good amendments

The 174 proposed amendments target six major legislative and policy domains:


1. State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) Governance & Sovereign Wealth Fund


Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) Act: Bringing entities held by the SWF (such as OGDCL, Pakistan State Oil, and other major blue-chip public corporations) under strict compliance with standard SOE transparency, auditing, and corporate governance norms.


Joint Investment Provisions: Introducing clear legal frameworks within the SWF Act to govern joint-venture foreign and domestic investments.


Board Independence: Amending lines of accountability between line ministries, the Finance Division, and SOE boards to eliminate direct bureaucratic interference and enforce commercial autonomy.


2. Civil Service & Anti-Corruption Transparency


Asset Declarations of Public Officials: Standardizing legal mechanisms for high-ranking government officials to declare assets.


Inter-Agency Intelligence Sharing: Requiring the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to share asset and income data with the Establishment Division to initiate disciplinary and legal inquiries into disproportionate wealth.


Public Wealth Registry Thresholds: Setting legal boundaries on what asset disclosures must be made publicly accessible versus restricted disclosures.


3. Financial Sector, Foreign Remittances & Currency Integration


Payment Systems & Remittance Subsidies: Repealing statutory subsidy schemes (previously exceeding Rs 120 billion) designed to artificially incentivize remittance inflows, replacing them with permanent cost-efficiency improvements in official payment rails.


Local Currency Integration: Aligning exchange regulations and foreign exchange market oversight with free-float mechanisms to curb parallel/grey-market rate premiums.


4. Fiscal Consolidation, Taxation & Amnesties


Supplementary Budget Grants: Placing statutory bans or requiring mandatory parliamentary approval prior to the sanctioning of off-budget supplementary grants.


Prohibition of Tax Amnesties: Barring the executive branch from introducing new tax amnesties, special exemptions, or selective preferential tax treatments.


National Fiscal Pact Harmonization: Harmonizing federal tax bases (notably services, real estate, and agricultural income tax) with provincial legislative jurisdictions.


5. Energy Market & Commodity Sector Liberalization


Captive Power Phase-Out: Legal and tariff enforcement mandating industrial captive-power units to transition to the national grid.


Distribution Company (DISCO) Restructuring: Legal framework enabling privatization, long-term concession agreements, and anti-theft enforcement for provincial power distributors.


Commodity De-regulation (Sugar Sector): Liberalizing commodity pricing and export/import policy by dismantling state support pricing and quota controls.


6. Climate Change & Resilience (RSF Benchmarks)


Public Investment Management Assessment for Climate (PIMA/C-PIMA): Amending financial planning rules to integrate mandatory climate-risk screening for federal public sector development projects (PSDP).


Disaster Risk Financing: Legal allocation provisions establishing dedicated catastrophe and green transition funding mechanisms.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top