YT Debate: China's lack of war experience is its greatest weakness. ?

No, they don’t.

Indian Hindus living in the West are the ones Western whites themselves often treat as superior — not because they demand it or act superior. That recognition feels weird sometimes, but it’s theirs, not something we chase. Chinese and Filipinos are the ones measuring worth by how much validation they can extract from the same whites. Projecting your own habit onto us doesn’t change the reality.
Lol, whose PM just loves to grope Trump by the butt, then hug and kiss Trump hard on the body. Now, latest Trump said that person is a killer and dumped him without a blink. Sore losers.
 
I think you just described India in a nutshell. Complete cope because the numbers show India is nothing in any field.
I described you.

Calling India “nothing in any field” is pure cope, born from a deep inferiority complex
 
1962 war was not a war fought to annex Tibet; it was a limited India–China border conflict. Another serious armed confrontation took place in 1967 at Nathu La and Cho La,

In the 1967 clashes, Indian sources put Chinese losses at 340 killed and 450 wounded. The U.S. Institute of Peace gives a much wider historical estimate of 36–790 Chinese casualties
Is that the crap that Indian media feeds you all the time?

China-India border Nathu La clashes in 1967

_20230821003714-png.22338

001wn5t8gy1gv9hxtlvsij60iw0bb0yr02-jpg.22336

002yz38rly1gv9hjudsvvj60wn0szjy002-jpg.22337
 
Lol, whose PM just loves to grope Trump by the butt, then hug and kiss Trump hard on the body. Now, latest Trump said that person is a killer and dumped him without a blink. Sore losers.
calling it “groping” while inventing a “killer” dump just shows how desperate the cope has become.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ety
Indian billionaires and millionaires do not migrate to the West. India has the world's third-largest billionaire population, after the United States and China, and they have no reason to leave India.

The Indian Hindus who make up the wealthiest community in US come from middle-class or poor backgrounds. They migrated to the US, built their careers there, earned their wealth there, and eventually became rich through their own achievements.


So why did these Indians only achieve success after immigrating to the United States, rather than achieving the same level of success in India?

▲▲▲ That is the question you should be asking.

Because the United States has better universities and research institutions, a high-paying technology industry, a huge consumer market, and a more mature and comprehensive capital market. These conditions provide better opportunities for talented people to develop their careers.

--------------------

You say India has the world's third-largest billionaire population, but at the same time, why does India also have huge slums that are known around the world?

According to India's 2011 Census, about 65.5 million people were living in slums across 2,613 cities and towns.

It is reportedly estimated that around 700,000 to 1 million people live in Dharavi, Mumbai.

Dharavi has existed for more than a century. Why has India still been unable to solve this problem? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Back on topic: Great power rivalry
China's strategic contest with the United States and its vassal states

The two wars have exposed the West’s sinister intentions at every turn: using NATO’s eastward expansion to treat Ukraine as a pawn in a vain attempt to weaken Russia; and, after suppressing the weak nation of Venezuela, turning its spearhead toward Iran. The ultimate goal of these two wars points squarely at China. The Chinese people have long been fully aware of this. Relying on its formidable strength, China has responded with calm confidence.

Today, the West finds itself in a weak position in both wars and has even turned around to ask China to help end them—it has simply become the laughingstock of the world!

Today's China fears no challenge or war in any form and challenges the United States on all fronts! To return to the pinnacle of the world!
 
Last edited:
So why did these Indians only achieve success after immigrating to the United States, rather than achieving the same level of success in India?

▲▲▲ That is the question you should be asking.

Because the United States has better universities and research institutions, a high-paying technology industry, a huge consumer market, and a more mature and comprehensive capital market. These conditions provide better opportunities for talented people to develop their careers.

--------------------

You say India has the world's third-largest billionaire population, but at the same time, why does India also have huge slums that are known around the world?

According to India's 2011 Census, about 65.5 million people were living in slums across 2,613 cities and towns.

It is reportedly estimated that around 700,000 to 1 million people live in Dharavi, Mumbai.

Dharavi has existed for more than a century. Why has India still been unable to solve this problem? :rolleyes:
There are slums in the US too. Chinese, Japanese, Koreans and Taiwanese live in them.

Hindus in the West don’t abandon their names like Chinese do. We keep them, live among Western whites, and assimilate without hiding. Chinese still pack into their own enclaves and pretend it’s strength.

Yet Hindus are the richest and most influential community in the US. Your constant pointing at Indian slums is pure cope. It only highlights how little you have to stand on.
 
There are slums in the US too. Chinese, Japanese, Koreans and Taiwanese live in them.

Hindus in the West don’t abandon their names like Chinese do. We keep them, live among Western whites, and assimilate without hiding. Chinese still pack into their own enclaves and pretend it’s strength.

Yet Hindus are the richest and most influential community in the US. Your constant pointing at Indian slums is pure cope. It only highlights how little you have to stand on.

Are there no Indians living in American slums? :rolleyes:

When you boast that India has the world's third-largest billionaire population, yet accuse me of mentioning India's slums, you are simply avoiding the issue and helping India evade responsibility. This is no one else's fault.

Besides, the United States having slums and India having a large number of world-famous slums can both be true at the same time.

India's slum problem has therefore persisted for more than a century without being solved.

-------------

And the fact that you would even attack someone for adopting an English name is simply absurd.

Many diplomats who come to mainland China or Taiwan adopt Chinese names. Are they insulting themselves and their countries? After all, diplomats also represent the countries they serve.

English is part of compulsory education on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and we all have English names. So, according to your logic, we have also abandoned our own Chinese names in our own societies.

Your understanding of the world is very limited, and you lack basic international common sense. You are making baseless smears, which is completely unreasonable.

▼▼▼ The current Indian ambassador to China, Vikram Doraiswami, has the Chinese name 「魏嘉盟」. According to your logic, it seems that he has abandoned his Indian name and insulted India as well....... :cool:

https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/魏嘉盟
dfsfwer.jpg
 
Last edited:
Are there no Indians living in American slums? :rolleyes:

When you boast that India has the world's third-largest billionaire population, yet accuse me of mentioning India's slums, you are simply avoiding the issue and helping India evade responsibility. This is no one else's fault.

Besides, the United States having slums and India having a large number of world-famous slums can both be true at the same time.

India's slum problem has therefore persisted for more than a century without being solved.

-------------

And the fact that you would even attack someone for adopting an English name is simply absurd.

Many diplomats who come to mainland China or Taiwan adopt Chinese names. So, they are apparently insulting themselves and their countries, since diplomats represent the very countries they serve.

English is part of compulsory education on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and we all have English names. So, according to your logic, we have also abandoned our own Chinese names in our own societies.

Your understanding of the world is very limited, and you lack basic international common sense. You are making baseless smears, which is completely unreasonable.

▼▼▼ The current Indian ambassador to China, Vikram Doraiswami, has the Chinese name 「魏嘉盟」. According to your logic, it seems that he has abandoned his Indian name and insulted India as well....... :cool:

https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/魏嘉盟
View attachment 217368
It's hypocritical for Indians to criticize Chinese for using English names while their country has adopted English the language of their colonial masters as its official language, now big part of their culture. Many foreigners living or working in China also have Chinese names.
 
It's hypocritical for Indians to criticize Chinese for using English names while their country has adopted English the language of their colonial masters as its official language, now big part of their culture. Many foreigners living or working in China also have Chinese names.

Yes, there are also plenty of foreigners in Taiwan who adopt Chinese names. We have never made fun of them. On the contrary, we see it as a friendly gesture that shows they want to get closer to the local people and become part of our society.

But in the eyes of some Indians, it has somehow become a major problem, and even an insult to themselves.

This is simply hard to understand. They are clearly just stirring up trouble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ety
Are there no Indians living in American slums? :rolleyes:

When you boast that India has the world's third-largest billionaire population, yet accuse me of mentioning India's slums, you are simply avoiding the issue and helping India evade responsibility. This is no one else's fault.

Besides, the United States having slums and India having a large number of world-famous slums can both be true at the same time.

India's slum problem has therefore persisted for more than a century without being solved.

-------------

And the fact that you would even attack someone for adopting an English name is simply absurd.

Many diplomats who come to mainland China or Taiwan adopt Chinese names. So, they are apparently insulting themselves and their countries, since diplomats represent the very countries they serve.

English is part of compulsory education on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and we all have English names. So, according to your logic, we have also abandoned our own Chinese names in our own societies.

Your understanding of the world is very limited, and you lack basic international common sense. You are making baseless smears, which is completely unreasonable.

▼▼▼ The current Indian ambassador to China, Vikram Doraiswami, has the Chinese name 「魏嘉盟」. According to your logic, it seems that he has abandoned his Indian name and insulted India as well....... :cool:

https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/魏嘉盟
View attachment 217368
Hindus don’t live in American slums. Chinese do.

If life in China is so excellent, why are Chinese flooding into the US only to squat in those slums?

No Indian Hindu takes an English name. Chinese do it constantly — even inside China. That is pure, raw inferiority. They can’t even keep their own names without borrowing Western ones for status.
 
Hindus don’t live in American slums. Chinese do.

If life in China is so excellent, why are Chinese flooding into the US only to squat in those slums?

No Indian Hindu takes an English name. Chinese do it constantly — even inside China. That is pure, raw inferiority. They can’t even keep their own names without borrowing Western ones for status.


◉ Show me the evidence that Hindus don't live in American slums.

◉ There are currently more than 2 million Japanese people living in Brazil. Does that mean life in Brazil is better than in Japan?

◉ Why don't you explain why the Indian ambassador to China adopted a Chinese name? He has already insulted India, so don't pretend you didn't see it. ▼▼▼ :cool:
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/魏嘉盟
dfsfwer.jpg
 
◉ Show me the evidence that Hindus don't live in American slums.

◉ There are currently more than 2 million Japanese people living in Brazil. Does that mean life in Brazil is better than in Japan?

◉ Why don't you explain why the Indian ambassador to China adopted a Chinese name? He has already insulted India, so don't pretend you didn't see it. ▼▼▼ :cool:
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/魏嘉盟
View attachment 217369


Show evidence that Hindus live in American slums the way Chinese do. Hindus in the US are the highest-income, highest-educated group in the country. They don’t concentrate in Chinatowns or low-income enclaves. Your side does. That is the difference.

The Japanese-in-Brazil example is a weak deflection. Japanese migrated generations ago under different conditions. It doesn’t erase the fact that large numbers of Chinese keep leaving China for the West and still end up clustering in poorer urban pockets while Hindus do not.

As for the Indian ambassador adopting a Chinese name — provide the actual name and the proof. Until then it’s just another invented story. Hindus keep their names. Chinese change theirs for Western or local approval even inside their own country. That pattern is yours, not ours. Stop projecting.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top