YT Debate: China's lack of war experience is its greatest weakness. ?

[ety]

No, they don’t.

Indian Hindus living in the West are the ones Western whites themselves often treat as superior — not because they demand it or act superior. That recognition feels weird sometimes, but it’s theirs, not something we chase. Chinese and Filipinos are the ones measuring worth by how much validation they can extract from the same whites. Projecting your own habit onto us doesn’t change the reality.

Lol, whose PM just loves to grope Trump by the butt, then hug and kiss Trump hard on the body. Now, latest Trump said that person is a killer and dumped him without a blink. Sore losers.

 

[Kaveri Engine]

I think you just described India in a nutshell. Complete cope because the numbers show India is nothing in any field.

I described you.

Calling India “nothing in any field” is pure cope, born from a deep inferiority complex

 

[Beijingwalker]

1962 war was not a war fought to annex Tibet; it was a limited India–China border conflict. Another serious armed confrontation took place in 1967 at Nathu La and Cho La,

In the 1967 clashes, Indian sources put Chinese losses at 340 killed and 450 wounded. The U.S. Institute of Peace gives a much wider historical estimate of 36–790 Chinese casualties

Is that the crap that Indian media feeds you all the time?

China-India border Nathu La clashes in 1967

 

[Beijingwalker]

China-India border Nathu La clashes in 1967

 

[Kaveri Engine]

Lol, whose PM just loves to grope Trump by the butt, then hug and kiss Trump hard on the body. Now, latest Trump said that person is a killer and dumped him without a blink. Sore losers.

calling it “groping” while inventing a “killer” dump just shows how desperate the cope has become.

 

[Beijingwalker]

I described you.

Calling India “nothing in any field” is pure cope, born from a deep inferiority complex

India is always on the top, based on Indian media

 

[Panda_Hi]

Indian billionaires and millionaires do not migrate to the West. India has the world's third-largest billionaire population, after the United States and China, and they have no reason to leave India.

The Indian Hindus who make up the wealthiest community in US come from middle-class or poor backgrounds. They migrated to the US, built their careers there, earned their wealth there, and eventually became rich through their own achievements.

So why did these Indians only achieve success after immigrating to the United States, rather than achieving the same level of success in India?

▲▲▲ That is the question you should be asking.

Because the United States has better universities and research institutions, a high-paying technology industry, a huge consumer market, and a more mature and comprehensive capital market. These conditions provide better opportunities for talented people to develop their careers.

--------------------

You say India has the world's third-largest billionaire population, but at the same time, why does India also have huge slums that are known around the world?

According to India's 2011 Census, about 65.5 million people were living in slums across 2,613 cities and towns.

It is reportedly estimated that around 700,000 to 1 million people live in Dharavi, Mumbai.

Dharavi has existed for more than a century. Why has India still been unable to solve this problem?