Yemen Civil War News and Discussion.. an evolving situation

[RocketLaw]

Full contents:
There is truth to this. MbS stood his ground on Abraham Accords — refused to recognise Israel. He was against US attacks on Iran. He resisted when Iran attacked Saudi Arabia. But he made the mistake of reigniting Houthis by attacking Sanaa Airport. Shouldn’t have done that. There is still time to nip this situation in the bud and try to end this situation with some kind of agreement with Houthis rather than prolonging it.

 

[KingQamaR]

Full contents:
There is truth to this. MbS stood his ground on Abraham Accords — refused to recognise Israel. He was against US attacks on Iran. He resisted when Iran attacked Saudi Arabia. But he made the mistake of reigniting Houthis by attacking Sanaa Airport. Shouldn’t have done that. There is still time to nip this situation in the bud and try to end this situation with some kind of agreement with Houthis rather than prolonging it.

Were Houthis using the Airport to smuggle weapons-in ?

 

[RocketLaw]

Bad October / November



...(continue)... Ansar Allah (Houthis) are striking airports and energy infrastructure across Saudi.

Iraqi militias are ready to join the fight.

This is a disaster that a TODDLER could have predicted.

Were Houthis using the Airport to smuggle weapons-in ?

I have no idea, we all are trying to figure out the problems :/

 

[El Sidd]

They will probably do that before defending innocent Palestinians being killed on a daily basis but to be fair why are we advocating killing more civilians

That's unfortunately true.

Everyone is fatigued from all the senseless killings and economic depression.

 

[Falcon29]

Well US did end up evacuating it's bases in proximity of Iran... and continues to create a distance from Iranian reach. In that regard... I do not think anyone in GCC was able to ask politely for US to leave...

Second, leave the ball in zionist court... let them attack Iran and get their pound of flesh... as it stands they don't want the same from Arab states, do they?

Even when Israel attacks GCC seems to face brunt of retailation. Saudi's did not attack Iran during the ceasefire but they're being attacked by factions in Iraq and Yemen :

..
..
Coalition: Drone intercepted in the Eastern Region #Arabic_Breaking

 

[Falcon29]

Full contents:
There is truth to this. MbS stood his ground on Abraham Accords — refused to recognise Israel. He was against US attacks on Iran. He resisted when Iran attacked Saudi Arabia. But he made the mistake of reigniting Houthis by attacking Sanaa Airport. Shouldn’t have done that. There is still time to nip this situation in the bud and try to end this situation with some kind of agreement with Houthis rather than prolonging it.

Strike on Sanaa airport was long ago during the war and it was quiet for weeks after that. It's not because of that but likely because Iran wants create pressure to international trade along Red Sea.

 

[RescueRanger]

Fake news look at the time stamp on the tweet you posted and this original post:

This was the result of a failed ballistic missile launch that landed in Yemen! Members are advised to please fact check and refrain from posting unsubstanited, unverified tweets.

Geo Location:

 

[Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ]

Even when Israel attacks GCC seems to face brunt of retailation. Saudi's did not attack Iran during the ceasefire but they're being attacked by factions in Iraq and Yemen :

..
..
Coalition: Drone intercepted in the Eastern Region #Arabic_Breaking

Obviously, you'd be saying that based on experience and not emotion, right?
So let's take the last June 12 day war... zion attacked Iran and Iran replied in kind... and when US intervened on behalf of zion and struck Iranian facilities... Iran first informed and then launched a token response at US base in Qatar...

Are we right so far?

 

[RescueRanger]

 

[prothought]

1-) Because we are not stupid like you, to wage war and get our asses kicked.
2-) Iran would surely back-stab when we wage war against Israel.

You are right bro.
Zionist war criminals want Sunnis fight against Irani Shia and get weaker so that the goal of greater Israel could be realized.

Irani mullahs and their brainless lackies want Sunnis fight against Israel and both get weaker so that Shia Crescent/Hilal could be realized.

Both Zionists and Irani mullahs are the enemies of Allah, His Messenger PBUH, and the Muslims.

Both of them want to kill innocent Muslims.

Both help anyone (Zionists, Hindutva, Armenia, Taliban, Houthis, Hezbollah, etc.) who kills Muslims

 

[battalion25]

Bad October / November



...(continue)... Ansar Allah (Houthis) are striking airports and energy infrastructure across Saudi.

Iraqi militias are ready to join the fight.

This is a disaster that a TODDLER could have predicted.



I have no idea, we all are trying to figure out the problems :/

A miscalculation that would be welcomed whole heartedly but seriously doubt it.

Forget Yemen Iran itself could get invaded and the Mullah regime could be gone forever and that depends on how they manouver things here and it comes down to 2 things. You wanna die on the alter today or you wanna live to fight another day and the option Iran will always take is the second choice cause they are not stupid like the Houthis or these ridiculous militias. Iran is an ancient civilization and that has experience in this category

 

[RocketLaw]

 

[Saifullah]

This is for all the Houthi fanboys. This is what they support. Apparently this is to “free” Gaza.

 

[The SC]

 

[RescueRanger]

Just a polite reminder to always double check your posts... According to some "OSINT" accounts on X this aircraft was damaged by Iranian strikes on Prince Sultan Air Base in March.


---
Some important things to note:
1. Misidentification; this is not an RE-3A . This is a Boeing KE-3A. This is an important distinction, the E-3G is a spy aircraft that performs a SIGINT role, as is evident in this image it lacks "Hog Nose" and the ELINT and COMINT modules on the front of the aircraft. This is a refuller.
2. Notice the hydraulic bleeding and clean cut of the tail, this is indicative of an aircraft being parked as an artifact and being scavenged for parts. Also note lack of any obvious impact craters near the aircraft. A ballistic strike even from a small warhead creates a "impact crater" and outward fragmentation both of which are missing from this image.

3. This image isn't even from 2026... Its not even from 2025... It's from 2016:



Just remember... Just because someone puts "OSINT" after their name or claims to share "OSINT" 99% times its pure Bullshit.

Please kindly always check your sources before sharing.

@Musings