US - Pakistan relationship

[Yasser76]

As I said the numbers and actual data speak for itself, rest of what you said is a nothing burger.

As for your record transit in Gwadar, it seems rosy, but this too would be temporary unless it found a way to turn this crisis-driven temporary spoke into a permanent route; for your information, there hasn't been much work done on this, because you don't have the talent to go through with it.

https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/ports-logistics/gwadar-s-real-challenge-is-not-geography-it-s-shipping-lines

Also, can I ask why you have this in your signature? "Pakistan Administered Kashmir". Surely you mean just Pakistan right?

 

[PakFactor]

Massive Chinese military support is a "nothing burger" shows some pretty high brow ignorance.

"because you don't have the talent to go through with it." Weird choice of words dude...."you". Thought you were Pakistani, surely you mean we?

View attachment 219256

What difference does it make, you, we, or shit hole; same thing. Thora upar socho.

As for China, I already said they're tolerating you because of countering India; once that threat to them is gone or they settle their differences, there will be a change in the relationship; as one can only for so long carry a dead horse they already caring the North Korean and now Russia horse. Truly unfortunate that China has no solid partners it can form into a coalition.

 

[Yasser76]

What difference does it make, you, we, or shit hole; same thing. Thora upar socho.

As for China, I already said they're tolerating you because of countering India; once that threat to them is gone or they settle their differences, there will be a change in the relationship; as one can only for so long carry a dead horse they already caring the North Korean and now Russia horse. Truly unfortunate that China has no solid partners it can form into a coalition.

You are ranting at making no sense. Anyway, very very weird you state "You" and not "we" when referring to Pakistani efforts, and again asking, why have "Pakistan Administered Kashmir" on your signature? That and demeaning and bringing down anything positive about Pakistan just seems very strange for a "Pakistani" on a defence forum.

 

[Yasser76]

Your constitution and other agreements with Azad Jammu Kashmir confirm that it is administered jointly with Islamabad. AJK has its own President, Prime Minister, Parliament, Supreme Court, and flag.

The same is true of GB; these regions are not legally part of Pakistan, and their political activities are strictly bound to a pro-Pakistan ideology.

Here, let me pull your favorite document out of your behind (the constitution) and show you:

257	Provision relating to the State of Jammu and Kashmir. When the people of the State of Jammu and Kashmir decide to accede to Pakistan, the relationship between Pakistan and the State shall be determined in accordance with the wishes of the people of that State.

Chapter 4: "General." of Part XII: "Miscellaneous"

Don't even know your own country.

No Pakistani ever calls it that, nice try. "Your constitution"!/ Surely you mean ours right? It is so easy to see right through you

 

[PakFactor]

No Pakistani ever calls it that, nice try. "Your constitution"!/ Surely you mean ours right? It is so easy to see right through you

View attachment 219262

It doesn't matter what other Pakistani's call it; what matters is what's written in the document and how it's handled. If you don't like it, have your Parliament change it.

 

[Yasser76]

It doesn't matter what other Pakistani's call it; what matters is what's written in the document and how it's handled. If you don't like it, have your Parliament change it.

Whatever, most people see right through you

 

[Michael]

As for China, I already said they're tolerating you because of countering India; once that threat to them is gone or they settle their differences, there will be a change in the relationship; as one can only for so long carry a dead horse they already caring the North Korean and now Russia horse. Truly unfortunate that China has no solid partners it can form into a coalition.

I am afraid I cannot agree with this point of view.

China has consistently pursued an independent foreign policy. Frankly speaking, at a fundamental level, China does not place its trust in any allies. In Chinese culture, an "ally" is merely a tactical tool rather than a strategic imperative. If one were to identify a true ally, the Chinese government’s only ally is the People's Liberation Army (PLA).

Regarding disputes involving neighboring countries, China’s stance is that its own interests must not be compromised. Here, it is essential to analyze the relationships between India and Pakistan, China and India, and China and Pakistan separately, rather than conflating them. Conflating these relationships would lead to serious misjudgments on many issues.

As for China’s relations with North Korea and Russia, your assessment is even more wide of the mark.
From a military-strategic perspective, Russia is China’s greatest "potential adversary." Due to factors such as diplomatic realities and economic ties, the current relationship between China and Russia appears very friendly on the surface. This leads many to mistakenly believe that the two nations are "allies." I can only say that such a judgment is extremely naive.
Regarding North Korea: because China’s previous generation of leaders signed the country's only military alliance treaty with North Korea, modern China is bound to honor that agreement based on the fundamental principle of keeping one's word. In reality, however, this issue is highly controversial within China itself. Consequently, official Chinese bodies handle the matter with great caution. While official rhetoric continues to emphasize the relationship, the actual day-to-day ties between the two sides are quite ordinary.

 

[Yasser76]

I am afraid I cannot agree with this point of view.

China has consistently pursued an independent foreign policy. Frankly speaking, at a fundamental level, China does not place its trust in any allies. In Chinese culture, an "ally" is merely a tactical tool rather than a strategic imperative. If one were to identify a true ally, the Chinese government’s only ally is the People's Liberation Army (PLA).

Regarding disputes involving neighboring countries, China’s stance is that its own interests must not be compromised. Here, it is essential to analyze the relationships between India and Pakistan, China and India, and China and Pakistan separately, rather than conflating them. Conflating these relationships would lead to serious misjudgments on many issues.

As for China’s relations with North Korea and Russia, your assessment is even more wide of the mark.
From a military-strategic perspective, Russia is China’s greatest "potential adversary." Due to factors such as diplomatic realities and economic ties, the current relationship between China and Russia appears very friendly on the surface. This leads many to mistakenly believe that the two nations are "allies." I can only say that such a judgment is extremely naive.
Regarding North Korea: because China’s previous generation of leaders signed the country's only military alliance treaty with North Korea, modern China is bound to honor that agreement based on the fundamental principle of keeping one's word. In reality, however, this issue is highly controversial within China itself. Consequently, official Chinese bodies handle the matter with great caution. While official rhetoric continues to emphasize the relationship, the actual day-to-day ties between the two sides are quite ordinary.

Ignore him, very unlkely he is Pakistani, and his posts lack any facts or substance, but rather rely on provocation as you can see. Even his email signature is trying to provoke