US - Pakistan relationship

As I said the numbers and actual data speak for itself, rest of what you said is a nothing burger.

As for your record transit in Gwadar, it seems rosy, but this too would be temporary unless it found a way to turn this crisis-driven temporary spoke into a permanent route; for your information, there hasn't been much work done on this, because you don't have the talent to go through with it.


Also, can I ask why you have this in your signature? "Pakistan Administered Kashmir". Surely you mean just Pakistan right?

1791909665880.png
 
Massive Chinese military support is a "nothing burger" shows some pretty high brow ignorance.

"because you don't have the talent to go through with it." Weird choice of words dude...."you". Thought you were Pakistani, surely you mean we?

View attachment 219256

What difference does it make, you, we, or shit hole; same thing. Thora upar socho.

As for China, I already said they're tolerating you because of countering India; once that threat to them is gone or they settle their differences, there will be a change in the relationship; as one can only for so long carry a dead horse they already caring the North Korean and now Russia horse. Truly unfortunate that China has no solid partners it can form into a coalition.
 
What difference does it make, you, we, or shit hole; same thing. Thora upar socho.

As for China, I already said they're tolerating you because of countering India; once that threat to them is gone or they settle their differences, there will be a change in the relationship; as one can only for so long carry a dead horse they already caring the North Korean and now Russia horse. Truly unfortunate that China has no solid partners it can form into a coalition.

You are ranting at making no sense. Anyway, very very weird you state "You" and not "we" when referring to Pakistani efforts, and again asking, why have "Pakistan Administered Kashmir" on your signature? That and demeaning and bringing down anything positive about Pakistan just seems very strange for a "Pakistani" on a defence forum.
 
Your constitution and other agreements with Azad Jammu Kashmir confirm that it is administered jointly with Islamabad. AJK has its own President, Prime Minister, Parliament, Supreme Court, and flag.

The same is true of GB; these regions are not legally part of Pakistan, and their political activities are strictly bound to a pro-Pakistan ideology.

Here, let me pull your favorite document out of your behind (the constitution) and show you:

257 Provision relating to the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
When the people of the State of Jammu and Kashmir decide to accede to Pakistan, the relationship between Pakistan and the State shall be determined in accordance with the wishes of the people of that State.


Don't even know your own country.

No Pakistani ever calls it that, nice try. "Your constitution"!/ Surely you mean ours right? It is so easy to see right through you

1791921705753.png
 
No Pakistani ever calls it that, nice try. "Your constitution"!/ Surely you mean ours right? It is so easy to see right through you

View attachment 219262

It doesn't matter what other Pakistani's call it; what matters is what's written in the document and how it's handled. If you don't like it, have your Parliament change it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top