Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jordan.As I said, you still can't trust these numbers. The delivery of the third battery of Arrow 2 was speculated and as Israel had already received the first launcher of the first battery of Arrow 3 in 2017, TMB 2024 would have to be informing that there are 4 Arrow 2/3 batteries. In any case, we are approaching the number close to Israel's anti-aircraft defense.
THAAD I haven't seen confirmation yet.
Although the US sent:
Probably from some CENTCOM country that had THAAD.
@tsunset look at this clown.
When I first followed him he posted sources and credible info. Then he amassed a ton of followers and became a propaganda spewing machine.
I think there will be no attack for this week, better wait 2 or 3 weeks/ a month, for the moment they judge the best
Israeli media reports suggest that if Iran targets strategic facilities in Israel directly then Jerusalem will likely retaliate with an exceptional response: an electromagnetic attack. Although an electromagnetic bomb has never been used before, its effects are known. It does not harm humans and creates a large EMP (electromagnetic pulse) in surrounding areas, completely destroying all electronic systems. Experts say that an Israeli EMP strike on Iran will “bring it back to the Stone Age”. - (Sources: Daily Times/British)
US destroyed 85 targets
within days after the attack in Jordan.
Because, what kind of message do we send if our retaliation that took us 2 weeks to plan fails to hit any meaningful targets?
You failed to understand my point.Seems like people don’t understand basic physics. A widespread EMP is extremely hard to do and would require so many different variables to determine its strength and range.
Either way you would need to do higher altitude thermonuclear explosion to have any hope.
“85 targets” is propaganda. One site they targeted most of it was still standing per Sat imagery. And none of the sites were on Iranian soil. And US did not have to worry about a large scale war or counter response.
About 5 days. Apples to oranges comparison.
You wouldn’t have hit “anything mebagidul” if your counter response was 1 second after Israel’s attack.
You would have hit anything meangifuk if you launched missiles for 3 days.
You aren’t going to “bomb” Israeli capability away. Anything destroyed is replenished by America free of charge.
So the message is that you are willing to for the first time in history of Islamic Republic, directly attack Israeli sovereignty. That in itself is a massive feat that no other state has done since Saddam in 1990 PG War.
You failed to understand my point.
Now that we have given them enough time to prepare, and with the US and Israel being on high alert, there's a very high chance our BMs are going to get intercepted.
If we decide to launch a small scale attack that gets intercepted or fails to hit anything meaningful after 2 weeks of preparation, we lose. If we decide to launch a large scale attack that leads to US/Israel attacking us, we lose.
I dont care about Israeli air defence. I am worried about the increasing amount of American fighters, carriers and air defences beings stationed everywhere around us and Israel as we speak.Lol and 3 or 5 or 7 days ago they weren’t? You think Israel air defense crews were sitting at home playing call of duty? When Houthi’s launch munitions every week at Israel?
It wouldn’t have made a major difference. Don’t let the leaks fool you, Israel started preparing as soon as the strike happened. Iran had to prepare its own forces for the counter strike and prepare all contingent plans of what to do in the hours after.
When Solemani was killed it happened on foreign soil and Iran was able to respond quicker because they attacked Al-Assad which was a Iraqi airbase.
This situation is different, Iran has to hit another country’s actual soil. A country who doesn’t back down and is known for escalating attacks in a disproportionate way.
So now it wasn’t as easy as firing 5 missiles 2 days later and as long as you hit something you can call it a day.
It was a lose-lose situation the second the strike happened. Waiting an extra week wasn’t going to change reality on the ground.
There is nothing to hit that will radically weaken Israel. Everything is replaceable. So any strike from the get go was going to be superficial.
That’s not an “Iranian thing” btw, look at Saudi Air campaign (Yemen), US air campaign (Iraq/Yemen/Syria), and Israel air campaign (Lebanon/Syria), hundreds of airstrikes and the enemy continues to expand. So what good will one or two salvos by Iran do? Nothing. Wether every missile hits or doesn’t the whole point is to defend your redlines. Which is that attacks on your soil is a redline.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.