Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Firstly, US never dropped LBJ/MBJ/HBJ path, here they are doubling down on development of LBJIn a way it really is.
Dedicated electronic warfare has lost relevance in the US, given the ability of enemy IADS to be targeted by a kinetic attack at the same ranges at which electronic attack is possible.

What are you talking about, even IAF is doing radar fingerprinting matching since decade and half now for long range radar detection. And then to launch DPSA stike or DEW strike , and for doing DPSA LBJ/MBJ/HBJ become more important.Previously, there was no way to target enemy IADS at long distances and this required strong action trying to neutralize, even temporarily, the enemy's ability to detect, track and engage the attacking force so that it could reach the weapons' launch distance.
Nothing new, as I said before, even IAF is doing that for a decade now.. Today, an F-15EX or even an F-16 can locate and attack IADS (including launchers, radars, command centers, etc.) at the same distance as an EA-18G attacks them electronically.
F-35 is not optimized for UHF/S/L-band radars, which majority of ground radars going to be.Likewise, an F-35 can get closer and attack you at a much shorter distance.
Indeed, but you need dual mode seeker, combining IIR and PHH. Or you have to launch 2 missiles with different seekers for mission success.Synthetic aperture radar, GPS-guided weapons and terminal seeker missiles against ground targets, and ATA (automatic target acquisition) capabilities make the anti-aircraft system extremely vulnerable today.
If you start employing such tactics from Day 1 of war, you dont going to be left with sorties to launch other missions. JASSM type missiles are never meant for SEAD/DEAD ops, rather targeting command & control nodes.In short, these 5 squadrons(EW) are not useful to the US Navy, they do not work together with naval units, they only support local or allied units. The US Navy does not want to pay for something that it probably believes should be the role of the USAF, as the USAF operates a squadron of Growlers with the USN, the 390 ECS and the unit's planes are from the US Navy, but they are used together. for USAF personnel to gain on-the-job experience. But I seriously doubt they'll turn it off. It is an easier task to increase capabilities for the US Navy than for the JCS to lose that capability until they eventually have viable replacements planned. The proposal to cut five squadrons of E/A-18G Growlers and send these aircraft to AMARG I believe should not go ahead, especially considering the missions that these platforms perform. The E/A-18G is of great importance not only for the USA, but also within NATO because there is a lack of aircraft with similar capabilities within the organization, which makes me think further. Big countries like the idea of deployed drones and this could happen one day, but at the moment there is nothing available with such capabilities and so I hope that the Boeing platform will be maintained even without the five planned squadrons, but keeping the aircraft in operation.
The USAF recently incorporated the EPAWSS system into the F-15EX, which has “some” electronic attack capability, but is hardly a replacement platform in the dedicated EW strike capability 1 for one of the EF111. It also adopts the MALD-J missile capable of long-range jamming. And the various AESA radars available on USAF fighters provide some jamming capability in the higher bands. It is worth noting that even with the current GaA AESA radar, the F-15EX has the longest-range radar ever mounted on a fighter, which combined with the EPAWSS electronic defense suite it already offers a highly positive RCS versus radar range ratio that probably makes it superior to all 4/4.5 generation fighters with RCS less than 1 m². If he loses in this relationship it will probably only be for the 5th generation.
Still with the USAF they have the EC-130H Compass Call as a dedicated EA mission so far but they are already being retired from service and a variant of the Gulfstream G550(EC-37B) business jet is being developed to take on this role, next month Last year they released images of this new copy. The superior lift capacity and reliability of the EC-37B means that just 10 EC-37B aircraft provide EW capability equivalent to the original fleet of 14 high-demand EC-130H aircraft.
A SEAD attack would include swarms of MALD-J decoy/jamming missiles, electronic attack aircraft (EC-37B), supersonic anti-radar missiles launched below the radar horizon, stand-off stealth munitions (JSOW, SDB, Storm Breaker... . ), stealth cruise missiles (JASSM, CALCM, JASSM-ER), rapid response munitions against tactical targets (AARGM-ER), jamming pods (NGJ), among others.
If we look broadly, US-dedicated EW multiplatforms are losing relevance, just as aircraft SEAD capabilities are shifting considerably to legacy multirole aircraft systems.
And this is the big question:Now Turkiye has most modern KORKUT , SUNGUR , HISAR-A , HISAR-O and S400 Air Defense Systems
also SIPER Air Defense System enter service this year
and GUMS Ballisitc Missile Defense System in 2028-2030 period
Iranians wouldn't attack with just "low-speed drones". They have a variety of UAVs and cruise missiles. I think someone had posted about them months ago. Maybe @Mehdipersian @Immortals @muhammed45 @Mr Iran Eye @OldTwilight someone from inside Persia I think had posted lists of them.And low speed Iranian Drones are easy target for Turkish AD Systems like KORKUT , SUNGUR , HISAR-A and HISAR-O
Why you tag me? I am not interested in the Turkish illusion. Turkey is just a weak country.And this is the big question:
Does Turkey actually have ENOUGH of these systems right now to protect the majority of its bases,infastracture and major cities? How many of the HISAR-A,HISAR-O are actually in active service right now? How many of the S-400 are ready to shoot down Ballistic Missiles from Iran let's say?
Iranians wouldn't attack with just "low-speed drones". They have a variety of UAVs and cruise missiles. I think someone had posted about them months ago. Maybe @Mehdipersian @Immortals @muhammed45 @Mr Iran Eye @OldTwilight someone from inside Persia I think had posted lists of them.
Again dodged the whole argument. BTW, best of luck.What the hell are you trolling here indian guy
Turkish Air Force will use all Systems for SEAD-DEAD role in a conflict
from Fighter Jets to stealth UCAVs from AEWC to Stand off Jammer Aircraft , and from Missiles to Kamikaze Drones
also decoy/jamming Systems like SUPER SIMSEK and GOKSUNGUR JEMSAH
American MALD
Turkish GOKSUNGUR JEMSAH
View attachment 34210
Shahed-136 has speed of 180 km/h
KEMANKES has speed of 720 km/h as like subsonic cruise missile
Ignorant Indian Guys ....
Do you know what about swarm attack and cost effective solution ?
Your garbage AD Systems including AKASH-NG never can stop a large swarm attack by 100 Turkish KEMANKES , TOLUN-IIR , KUZGUN-TJ , IHA-230 and SIMSEK at the same time
Turkiye has tons of cost effective systems from subsonic speed to supersonic speed
Why you tag me? I am not interested in the Turkish illusion. Turkey is just a weak country.
Turkey cannotdefend itself against Iran's attack. No one in the world can because Israel has the best defense system in the world and Everyone saw how Iranian missiles hit the target.
Be happy in your Turkish illusionAnd no any destruction in Israel
Fantasy boys ..... now Israeli Air Force coming to hit Iran
Iran is weak country and never can match with Turkish and Israeli Air Forces
Iran can not defend itself against modern Air Forces
Yes , we all saw a little drama. Let's be honest to each other here, your talk is for Islamic lumpen proletariat. You banned me from Achemenian Forum, it was pretty noticeable that on every single my qualification or observation you didn't have an answer .Why you tag me? I am not interested in the Turkish illusion. Turkey is just a weak country.
Turkey cannotdefend itself against Iran's attack. No one in the world can because Israel has the best defense system in the world and Everyone saw how Iranian missiles hit the target.
Terminal diving speed is important when hit the target
Ignorant False flager troll team of FOINIKAS
And this is the big question:
Does Turkey actually have ENOUGH of these systems right now to protect the majority of its bases,infastracture and major cities? How many of the HISAR-A,HISAR-O are actually in active service right now? How many of the S-400 are ready to shoot down Ballistic Missiles from Iran let's say?
Iranians wouldn't attack with just "low-speed drones". They have a variety of UAVs and cruise missiles. I think someone had posted about them months ago. Maybe @Mehdipersian @Immortals @muhammed45 @Mr Iran Eye @OldTwilight someone from inside Persia I think had posted lists of them.
Again dodged the whole argument. BTW, best of luck.



Any answer on my questions?Be happy in your Turkish illusion
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.