Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
'Imad' not EMAD. Named after Imad Mughniyeh.
I think I've heard different numbers ranged from 20 to 70 BMs launches from Iranian commentators in past days. (NOT military sources)The Iranian government is not in the business of addressing our curiosities.
The first oneI think I've heard different numbers ranged from 20 to 70 BMs launches from Iranian commentators in past days. (NOT military sources)
In western sources its somewhere between 100 to 120.
Based on evidences which side is reporting closer to reality ?
Jedaal and significant participants say otherwise. The dates correspond as well.No dadash it’s named after Iranian word for Pillar.
The only missile Iran has named after a foreign commander is Abu-Mahdi (a CM). There are no BMs named after people let alone foreign commanders beside Haj Qassem missile.
I'm not sure all these events are linked, just sayin..So Iran hit Isreali air bases with its ballistics missiles..... Pakistani missile program got sanctioned by yanks and now Iranian president is in Pakistan.
Very interesting chain of events.
Fully agree with you- Iran made its attack public and very visible- Israel apparently did a stealthy micro attack on one radar at an Iranian base in Isfahan (at worst) that no one could see or really verify - wtf- one acted while the other bluffed/didnt make any worthy impact..Believe what ever you like about Israel's pathetic little response that they are even too cowardly to take credit for!
The only other "attack" that I can think of in resent memory was as useless was when Pakistan killed a bunch of poor Pakistani migrants on Iran's side of the border after Iran destroyed a Terrorist training camp in Pakistan. At least Pakistan took responsibility for that attack unlike the Baby killing israelis!!!
I'm not sure all these events are linked, just sayin..
Yeah, English spelling is meaningless. Any phonetic will work.عماد مغنیه
موشک عماد
imad and emad are different pronunciation of Arabic word of 'عماد'
Keep in mind that Israel is a pioneer in that method of war. Those quadcopters can be easily smuggled via Azerbaijan and fit near the target. You can program the speciallly designed quadcopters with coordinates and after they reach those waypoints an IA asisted camera or IR/EO system can target the selected target without radio link or even human intervention. It is so demonic. Rotten quadcopters 5 or 6 years ago can target a specific target without need of radio link because its IR/EO IA assissted seeker. They can fly very low and fast. Being almost impossible to intercept.Lol no it’s not. Or else HZ and Hamas would be attacking Israelis with quadcopter. Or Al-Queda and ISIS would be attacking airports around the world with something that can be bought at a store.
There is no reason a quadcopter should have gotten anywhere close to that airport. There are jamming and electronic devices that will nuteralize these cheap consumer products. There are laser air defenses that can shoot them out of the air. There are automated AA guns tied to optical sensors. There are SHOHRADS. plenty of solutions to protect the base and S-300.
Once again, stop giving excuses for incompetence, the same incompetence that had 3 generals and 7 officers in one of the most watched buildings in all of Damascus.
Iran needs to fix this incompetence. The base is wholefully under protected from a systems standpoint against swarm attacks.
I don’t know what you have Nebo and Ghadir radar at the base then have AA guns, Hawk, and empty S-200 launchers protecting S-300. Where are all the fancy systems you built?
Jedaal and significant participants say otherwise. The dates correspond as well.
It’s Imad Mughniyeh who was no less significant as Al-Mohandes.
Keep in mind that Israel is a pioneer in that method of war. Those quadcopters can be easily smuggled via Azerbaijan and fit near the target. You can program the speciallly designed quadcopters with coordinates and after they reach those waypoints an IA asisted camera or IR/EO system can target the selected target without radio link or even human intervention. It is so demonic. Rotten quadcopters 5 or 6 years ago can target a specific target without need of radio link because its IR/EO IA assissted seeker. They can fly very low and fast. Being almost impossible to intercept.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.