show us where you see 50 block 3's lolPlus BLOCK III is already close to 50 in number
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
show us where you see 50 block 3's lolPlus BLOCK III is already close to 50 in number
my explanation for PFX was acm thought it was a cool name after seeing TFX lolI think you are reading "far more" into the "name" than is warranted. You are implying far more "intellectual thought" was given to what the name may convey than actually has been the case with the PAF. The key is that it is JF17 PFX - ergo - the same fighter and not a new one.. PFX is a localisation effort that looks to allow Pakistan to continue to build the jet when China closes down its manufacturing line, alongside the integration of more local and foreign(Turkish) systems into the plane.
I hope that the next edition of "Second to None" clarifies to all ..
show us where you see 50 block 3's lol
poor guy must still be asleepNot sure what he consumes, but whatever it is it let him „see“ more than 50 Block 3, J-31 in Pakistan soon, almost a 6th generation configuration … and surely soon more than 100 J-10CE!![]()
Hi,For air to ground and anti shipping role and to keep an aviation industry. They failed at making a decent replacement for F-1 so US stepped in to help, leveraging the agile falcon that had lost in the USAF competition. It gained more internal fuel, and additional hard points but became draggier.
Question is was it worth it? CFTs did the same for range later on for the F-16s which the F-2 lack. And did they need a larger F-16 that cost four times as much when they also operated F-15s?
Hi,The same reason we bought J-10c’s for. Seeing the current state of the economy it becomes very difficult for PAF to keep buying more J-10’s.
Hence why not make JF-17 in the same class as that?
The enlarged JF-17 would be a very different fighter. Everything would have to be reworked pretty much.
From flight control systems to landing gear.
If PAF manages to make even a single test unit, it would vastly increase the knowledge base of PAC and in the future help it to take on more ambitious projects like fifth generation.
Localized Digital FBW, Flight controls, EW suit, Radar, Integrated Life Support System (ILSS), On-board Oxygen generator System (OBOGS), All the software and programming, Digital cockpit.
These localization’s would go a long way. I could however be wrong and PAF just be bringing rest of JF-17 manufacturing line with TOT.
But developing a new Fighter essentially like J-10c would not only increase RND and knowledge base but also help save valuable $ that would essentially be spent on big ticket items like Kaan or J-31 etc.
Two AshMs on stations 3 and 5 would give the Jf-17 very short legs. It doesn't support PN ops too far out. That is why J-10s have been seen training to support Masroor based ops, and also the need for atleast one more J-10 squadron.Hi,
Please check my my answer in post 650.
I seemed to have misunderstood your initial question.Hi,
Please check my my answer in post 650.
Remember it was the American’s who initially proposed an enlarged varient of the F-16 which became basis for F-2. They pressed the japs hard to be included in the program. Who knows what else might have came out of the program had the japs worked alone, might even be a different aircraft all together.IMO the F-2 largely suffered due to Japan's restrictions on exporting arms. The project amassed a large overhead and the JASDF couldn't order enough to make it economical.
show us where you see 50 block 3's lol
but its not though.He's adding JF17Bs in to Jf17 Block 3s, with the B being dual seater version of block 3s.
but its not though.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.