hussain0216
Elite Member
I'm.not getting this ...
We are led to believe Azad Kashmir is Pakistan centric and wants to be part of Pakistan and want rest of Indian Kashmir too
The Pakistan govt military want this too
We believe the voice of Pakistan kashmir is one
But
This indicates the opposite
Almost state within a state
So Pak seventy years of animosity is based on what exactly seems to me Kashmiri agenda is totally independent of Pakistan
A Muslim may disagree or argue with another Muslim,, but it's not tolerable to live alongside a enemy like the hindutva
Do you understand?
The Muslims of the subcontinent are not foreigners, they are from the lands they live in
Kashmiri are from Kashmir
As are sindhi, Punjabi etc etc
The point of partition was exactly what's happening in India today, where a STATE in India does not reflect Muslims history, culture, language, national character and pushes a Hindu narrative that often degrades Muslim history or culture in favor of some Hindu weirdness that Muslims do not identify with
So Jinnah view was you can't place hundreds of millions of Indian Muslims with a state that won't respect or display the national character of these diverse set of Muslims
EXACTLY WHATS HAPPENING IN INDIA TODAY
Pakistan for all it's faults reflects Muslims from our areas,, we may disagree, argue, even fight but that's our own issue
We wouldn't place ourselves or our lands under a Hindu extremist Indias rule, it's not about money,, it's about sheer hatred for a enemy
Their is a lot of ethnocentric jahilat within Pakistan, maybe it's the same in India with different states
I am of the view you can't allow this constant fassad everywhere, with small parties inciting populations on ethnocentric lines with victim mentality that can grow out of hand causing endless fassad and turmoil





