Bangladesh Socio-Political Crisis 2024 and onwards

Muslims in BD hate Bharat 10x more than the Paks do for they are 10x more in the receiving end.....

Muslims in BD now publicly admit that, prior to the war, the Pak authorities were like unborn babies in front of the Bharat backed Mujib-Hasina regimes as far as oppression is concerned....

They now say: Fi Naari Jahannma, Hassina! They don't utter this even for AAK Niazi or Tikka Khan or Yahya khan or Bhutto....

Kya howa, dosti khatum?!!
17900779063_bae7827a9a_o-1095x616.jpg
Lol, Modi is holding that photograph. Although I believe the 1971 debacle was Pakistan's fault, we mistreated the Bangladeshis.

Good thing we partitioned South Asia.
 
No one with sane mind admit such thing. Hassina was incredibly bad, but Pak military establishment is still by a large margin the worse thing that happen to people of this country since 1947. Hassina killed 1000 people and then fled. Pak army launched a brutal war on us that killed least 300k before they were put down by allied force.
I agree we Pakistanis wronged Bangladeshis in 1971. Thats why we got our punishment.

But Modi holding that photograph, lol. What a moron. I'm glad we partitioned the British Raj empire.
 
Hasina failed because she didn't address the special interest groups in time, so much so that the special interests grew and started dragging the whole country down. This bomb won't go off when the country's economy is doing OK. When the country's economy is in trouble, it triggers a storm.

America has the same special interest group problem right now, and I'm talking about the Jews.

btw: I hope that the people of Bangladesh will remain calm and united and pass through this special period peacefully. Maintain order and the rule of law in society and wait for a new Government to come to power.
 
No one with sane mind admit such thing. Hassina was incredibly bad, but Pak military establishment is still by a large margin the worse thing that happen to people of this country since 1947. Hassina killed 1000 people and then fled. Pak army launched a brutal war on us that killed least 300k before they were put down by allied force.
I said prior to the war. Not the war itself.
 
No one with sane mind admit such thing. Hassina was incredibly bad, but Pak military establishment is still by a large margin the worse thing that happen to people of this country since 1947. Hassina killed 1000 people and then fled. Pak army launched a brutal war on us that killed least 300k before they were put down by allied force.
I am sorry that the Pakistani army wronged your peoples in 1971.
As a Pakistani I feel sorry about that, and thats why Bangladesh got its independence.

Had Pakistani army been fair to Bangladeshis, perhaps there would still be an East Pakistan.

Anyways, Best of luck to Bangladesh. May Bangladesh and its people prosper.
 
PDF Pakistanis have long deluded themselves with wishful thinking that Modi is bad for India. My argument against Modi was restricted to something like 'IF Modi takes the Hindutva too far then India is in trouble because alienating tens of millions of Muslims would be really bad'. Whether Modi does that or not, remains to be seen. And, yes, I am aware of the Cow Vigilantes etc.

Otherwise, Modi is running a cleaner and more efficient govt than Indian National Congress and is masterfully using the Hindu sentiments to his advantage while India still progresses.
I (respectfully) disagree.

He is bad for my country. No qualifications. The lesser corruption (an illusion) included, and I am NOT a Congress supporter.
PDF Pakistanis have long deluded themselves with wishful thinking that Modi is bad for India. My argument against Modi was restricted to something like 'IF Modi takes the Hindutva too far then India is in trouble because alienating tens of millions of Muslims would be really bad'. Whether Modi does that or not, remains to be seen. And, yes, I am aware of the Cow Vigilantes etc.

Otherwise, Modi is running a cleaner and more efficient govt than Indian National Congress and is masterfully using the Hindu sentiments to his advantage while India still progresses.

The Indian Muslims--like almost all Muslims or Non Muslims of the Subcontinent are not revolutionaries or militaristic; they are all essentially meek! Yes, meek! If they were not then a mere 100,000 Brits won't be ruling hundreds of millions. For truly independent people, you have to look at Pakistan's extreme northwest and beyond that. But I digress.

As for Hasina-- and apologies if I sound like her 'fan'. I am not. I am objectively speaking: She stabilized Bangladesh and has built enough to let the next generation of BD to use whatever she has built. Her achievements are partly because she lasted so long.
My question to those who keep describing 'Muslims of the sub-continent' (clever wording, that) as 'meek' is simple: what were they expected to do? The 100,000 British ruling hundreds of millions didn't get there overnight, they worked hard, and in a uniform direction, with good people, bad people and indifferent people in their ranks. During this long journey, they dealt with an India - a sub-continent - that was then the same million different combinations of ethnicity, language, religion, culture and political affiliations as it is today.

We were unthinkably diverse then, just as we are unthinkably diverse today.

One of the melancholy thoughts that crosses my mind on occasion is that people in Pakistan, even given their own diversity as a way-sign, simply cannot grasp, except through personal experience, the manic diversity of India. Nobody could have got everyone together against the British in those conditions.
 
Last edited:
I said prior to the war. Not the war itself.
You need to read Shahab Nama by Qudart Ullah Shahab to understand how Pakistani establishment used to treat East Pakistan back in the day. That is if you can read Urdu.

BTW, I am still confused about one thing. When the hell did you transform from Turkish to Bangladeshi?
 
You need to read Shahab Nama by Qudart Ullah Shahab to understand how Pakistani establishment used to treat East Pakistan back in the day. That is if you can read Urdu.

BTW, I am still confused about one thing. When the hell did you transform from Turkish to Bangladeshi?
He is a Bangladeshi living in Turkey and aping their speech and manners of a time gone by.
 
You need to read Shahab Nama by Qudart Ullah Shahab to understand how Pakistani establishment used to treat East Pakistan back in the day. That is if you can read Urdu.

BTW, I am still confused about one thing. When the hell did you transform from Turkish to Bangladeshi?

He has long been known as a fraud. Turkish members in the previous forum also expressed doubts about his Turkishness. The guy is likely a Bangladeshi, not sure though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't know USA then

"Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh: How US Diplomat Donald Lu, whom Rahul Gandhi met during ‘secret visit’ to White House, has mastered regime change operations·"

I do.

Stop cooking up nonsense conspiracy theories. There is no evidence of US involvement in BD at the moment. We know the ground situation in BD and many of us arepolitically connected.
 
Saw this one FB :D


This is from 2011

PM -MMS saying that 25 percent of Bangladesh is Anti India

So Indian Govt was aware that
Whenever Hasina Govt becomes very unpopular she would be overthrown

We can deal with One more front if necessary ie if New Bangladesh government wants confrontation with India

We have enough BSF troops on the border

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top