Iranian Nuclear Doctrine

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

so now we enforce America and Israel's red lines on ourselves for them ?!

the sooner Khamenei and his cadre of incompetent advisers are replaced, the better.

 

[Hypersonic]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

so now we enforce America and Israel's red lines on ourselves for them ?!

the sooner Khamenei and his cadre of incompetent advisers are replaced, the better.

This is good cop bad cop strategy. Behind the scene I bet they’re all on the same. The message has been sent I.e we’re one step away from a nuclear weapon. In reality I bet Iran is already sitting on a few nukes

 

[Persian Gulf]

This is good cop bad cop strategy. Behind the scene I bet they’re all on the same. The message has been sent I.e we’re one step away from a nuclear weapon. In reality I bet Iran is already sitting on a few nukes

no we are not

 

[Khorasan Black Flags]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

so now we enforce America and Israel's red lines on ourselves for them ?!

the sooner Khamenei and his cadre of incompetent advisers are replaced, the better.

You want several armed nuclear countries around us?

 

[jauk]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

so now we enforce America and Israel's red lines on ourselves for them ?!

the sooner Khamenei and his cadre of incompetent advisers are replaced, the better.

I'd like to see the original comment.

 

[jauk]

You want several armed nuclear countries around us?

How will there be armed countries around us? Closest capable is Turkey which falls under the NATO umbrella. And Pakistan already is.

 

[Persian Gulf]

You want several armed nuclear countries around us?

(1) everyone in the region has nukes

(2) only Israel and Pakistan have nukes

Rahbar and has cadre of moronic advisors prefer the second scenario. but I would prefer the first. which isn't even realistic to begin with, unless you're brain dead and think Afghanistan and Iraq and Azerbaijan can build nuclear weapons. Egypt can't even deploy troops to the Sinai properly and you think they can build nukes. Turkey is the only other country that could plausibly build nukes but they are already under the NATO nuclear umbrella.

we sacrificed hundreds of billions of dollars to build a relatively primitive uranium enrichment programme that doesn't even meet commercial standards in order to live in the second scenario? do you realise how stupid that is? you should be praying that isn't the case.

 

[Khorasan Black Flags]

I prefer only Pakistan has nukes because Indians made them first

Beside zionist and Turkey under western umbrella, instead several artificial sheikhdoms and Middle Asian countries under zio/western/NATO umbrella

 

[ToddE]

Iran will not get a better opportunity to test few fission devices after the Israeli strike.

World already despises them because of genocide, Iran can diplomatically claim that we were attacked.

 

[the saint]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[BHAN85]

well even SSBN are for deterrence

if enemies know Iran has Hypersonic missiles + nuclear warheads they will think 100 times before doing anything

Elimination of Libya's WMD programs - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This teach a precious lesson to everybody.

The more you're armed the better to keep far Western states bullies.

They dont understand another language.

If someone disarm himself to keep happy Western democracies serial killers looters, they will impale him.

 

[RAJPUT]

This is good cop bad cop strategy. Behind the scene I bet they’re all on the same. The message has been sent I.e we’re one step away from a nuclear weapon. In reality I bet Iran is already sitting on a few nukes

Speculation. Until Iran tests a device, why even say that? What worse could happen to Iran, if it decides to test nukes, that hasn’t already happened? Economic sanctions likewise Pakistan? They already have worst ones. Being demonised further? No use. A direct attack from the USA or NATO? Not plausible, cuz nukes. So I don’t think they have anything to fear incase they do test them.

 

[BlutUndEhre44]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

so now we enforce America and Israel's red lines on ourselves for them ?!

the sooner Khamenei and his cadre of incompetent advisers are replaced, the better.

Ideally a fascist government would come in their stead and set things into motion. For the time being this means detente with the West and even a tactical alliance, or at least a willingness to give them what they want while maneuvering in the background to push Iran's interests. I am not advocating kowtowing to Jewish interests, but given the stance of the Islamic Republic, even neutrality right now would be welcomed by the West as a major breakthrough and buy Iran time.

A fascist regime in Iran would acknowledge the primacy of military needs. With the Islamic Republic and sanctions gone, Iran can move toward building a strong conventional military and investing more fully in its indigenous capabilities. The autarky of the Islamic Republic era was a necessary stepping stone, and with open markets and a willingness to work on some level with the ghouls of the West, Iran will be in a better position to build on what it has and become a powerhouse of innovation in defense.

This would mean making nuclear program a priority; a neutral, or even slightly pro-West government may be given the ability to possess nukes in a way that Israel does- plausibly deniable so as to not trigger a regional arms race. We've passed the point; Iran can manufacture nukes in short order and everything needed is in place and extremely costly to eliminate. All that is needed is for Iran's nuclear weaponization to be considered something the West can live with and what that needs is better relations and a change in Iranian foreign policy.

Germany undid its ties to international finance in the 1930s, and Iran can do it again when the time is right. But priorities must be set- a strong military, nuclear weapons, and then pull the rug from under everyone's feet. Once that occurs, Iran can settle accounts with its enemies. This is what strategic patience really means.

 

[Persian Gulf]

Ideally a fascist government would come in their stead and set things into motion. For the time being this means detente with the West and even a tactical alliance, or at least a willingness to give them what they want while maneuvering in the background to push Iran's interests. I am not advocating kowtowing to Jewish interests, but given the stance of the Islamic Republic, even neutrality right now would be welcomed by the West as a major breakthrough and buy Iran time.

A fascist regime in Iran would acknowledge the primacy of military needs. With the Islamic Republic and sanctions gone, Iran can move toward building a strong conventional military and investing more fully in its indigenous capabilities. The autarky of the Islamic Republic era was a necessary stepping stone, and with open markets and a willingness to work on some level with the ghouls of the West, Iran will be in a better position to build on what it has and become a powerhouse of innovation in defense.

This would mean making nuclear program a priority; a neutral, or even slightly pro-West government may be given the ability to possess nukes in a way that Israel does- plausibly deniable so as to not trigger a regional arms race. We've passed the point; Iran can manufacture nukes in short order and everything needed is in place and extremely costly to eliminate. All that is needed is for Iran's nuclear weaponization to be considered something the West can live with and what that needs is better relations and a change in Iranian foreign policy.

Germany undid its ties to international finance in the 1930s, and Iran can do it again when the time is right. But priorities must be set- a strong military, nuclear weapons, and then pull the rug from under everyone's feet. Once that occurs, Iran can settle accounts with its enemies. This is what strategic patience really means.

West is not that stupid

Is Turkey allowed nuclear weapons?

What will Iran's reputation be if it openly abandons Hezbollah etc?

If we integrate with the WEst there will be no 'rug pulling'. Is Turkey able to 'pull the rug'? Is Saudi?

 

[BlutUndEhre44]

West is not that stupid

Is Turkey allowed nuclear weapons?

What will Iran's reputation be if it openly abandons Hezbollah etc?

If we integrate with the WEst there will be no 'rug pulling'. Is Turkey able to 'pull the rug'? Is Saudi?

I don't know that Iran will need to openly abandon Hezbollah. I think Hezbollah is on its way out. It's in Iran's interest to keep doing what they're doing in terms of supporting them. Surely you realize IRGC high command knew that one day Hezbollah would be spent. These proxies were just cards to play.

Turkey is trying very hard to pull the rug, but it's an integral part of NATO- perhaps the most important component as it seals the Black Sea. Iran pulled the rug in 1979. It can do so again.