Vote Dr. Jill Stein as a protest against the Zionist Israeli Genocide of the Palestinians

[clutch]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[clutch]

Kamala is pure evil. Kamala want to slaughter Palestinians.

Just like Trump and his Zionist SOB Jared Kushner

 

[clutch]

America so bad,,,that I can't stand to leave it for my real country.
I brave,izzatdar,honest n very religious.
I always speak truth ,,,,,,,on internet.
Who am I?
I am BHAYYA.

You sound like a Dalit. America needs to break the Zionist shackles that hold it hostage. Otherwise, America is great.

 

[Strigon]

Not sure what this is going to accomplish...

• Jill Stein will never see the presidency no matter what.
• "Punishing" Kamala will get Trump elected
• Trump gave Israel the green light to do whatever it wants and not tell

Obviously, we have astute jill stein voters...

 

[Yommie]

Kamala doesn't care about Muslim vote. If she did, she end weapons to Israel. The point is moot. She's losing PA anyway. She's done. Adios. Sayonara.

 

[clutch]

Not sure what this is going to accomplish...

• Jill Stein will never see the presidency no matter what.
• "Punishing" Kamala will get Trump elected
• Trump gave Israel the green light to do whatever it wants and not tell

Obviously, we have astute jill stein voters...

It establishes the fact that Genocide has its consequences. Otherwise Muslim and those who oppose APAC, those who oppose Genocide, those who oppose Zionist terrorism means nothing.

If Jill Stein wins 5% of the vote, under US Law, she is entitled to Federal Funds and an equal platform as the other two parties. We can make it happen.

The U.S. law that addresses the eligibility of third-party candidates for federal funds in presidential elections is part of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), specifically under the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act (26 U.S.C. § 9004).

 

[SaadH]

That’s why it’s a protest vote. It’s to show the democrat party that it can’t take people for granted. It has to address grievances at least somewhat.

Actually, I firmly believe Democratic party is the party that is paid to lose by the corporate and zionist overlords. Forget palestinians it doesn't even pander to it's base. It never implements any policies that will cater to people who vote for them, i.e. no increase in minimum wage, no college tuition, no medicare for all and not even any urgency to codify roe vs. wade (abortion law).

For most politicians in US, it's more obligatory and required for them to not piss off the donors (zionists/corporatist) than it is to get re-elected. They are all handsomely rewarded after the fact even if they lose elections so long as they toe the party line and don't introduce any radical ideas to the national discussion, like medicare for all, antiwar, minimum wage, etc. If they don't, their whole career and finances are completely ruined.

Having said that, we have to punish #GenocideKamala and #GenocideDemocrat party for actually committing a genocide. Trump despite all his rhetoric hasn't actually committed the genocide and even if he does once in office it can't be any worse than what Biden/Kamala have managed so far. We will survive another four years of Trump but at least we will be satisfied we took action against those who actually committed the most heinous crime of this century.

 

[SaadH]

Trump won his term before against Hillary in this same manner…
…a bunch of democrat voters were furious how the Democratic Party sidelined Bernie Sanders and brought Hillary Clinton out as their candidate.

Same would happen if protest voting concept is used again. Either it would harm Trump and Kamala would win…or It would harm Kamala and Trump would win(depends on which voters end up protest voting).

- If a democrat was considering voting for Kamala…as a lesser of two evils…but then chose to protest vote instead. This would mean Trump wins(from that democrat’s perspective, greater of the two evils) and his/her protest vote is partially to blame.
- If a republican was considering voting for Trump…as a lesser of two evils…but then chose to protest vote instead. This would mean Kamala wins(from that republican’s perspective, greater of the two evils)…and his/her protest vote is partially to blame.

There is no such thing is lesser of two evils, and even then when it comes to Trump vs Harris, Harris is definitely the more evil of the two having taken part in the wholesale slaughter and maiming of over 20 thousand children. There is nothing Trump can do ever that will be more evil than that...

 

[lightning f57]

If I was American id vote for Jill, i liked bernie once upon a time but after oct 7 he lost the plot.

Both these are jews, so those who think those of us who criticize genocidal nazi zionists are anti semitic need a reality check.

 

[Strigon]

It establishes the fact that Genocide has its consequences. Otherwise Muslim and those who oppose APAC, those who oppose Genocide, those who oppose Zionist terrorism means nothing.

If Jill Stein wins 5% of the vote, under US Law, she is entitled to Federal Funds and an equal platform as the other two parties. We can make it happen.

The U.S. law that addresses the eligibility of third-party candidates for federal funds in presidential elections is part of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), specifically under the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act (26 U.S.C. § 9004).

First off, no one here is denying it.
Second, Jill's vote is a protest vote, a wasted vote.
Third, if this stupor does end up putting a criminal back in the office, the consequences, the horror x 10 times that happens next will be on the protest voter's hands.

And nice cite-a-lot as if it changes her chances to win the electoral college.

Perhaps you already know this but the vast majority of senators and House representatives are dual-nationals (Israeli and US). They will never let the status quo change, not with Jill.

The real method of bringing a change is having more Muslim or sympathetic members in HoR and Congress, since those votes change and make policies.

Harris is stuck between a rock and a hard place where she has to appease both sides. The same goes for all Democratic presidential nominees who have a chance of winning. Trump only has to appease white supremacists, poorly educated blacks, bat-shit-crazy Latinos, and Jews.

But leave it to the protest voters to swing an axe to their own feet and concurrently Palestinian feet as well. Remember the college protests? The road/ bridge blocks? OH YEA that won the hearts and minds of the people....

 

[Yommie]

Harris is stuck between a rock and a hard place where she has to appease both sides.

The only side she has to appease is the Jews. The Jews control the US. She can afford to lose the Muslim vote. She can afford to lose Michigan. She can afford to lose the election. She's a slave of the Jews.

 

[Strigon]

The only side she has to appease is the Jews. The Jews control the US. She can afford to lose the Muslim vote. She can afford to lose Michigan. She can afford to lose the election. She's a slave of the Jews.

Every politician that has a chance to win is....

 

[Yommie]

Every politician that has a chance to win is....

The US is in general hostile to Palestinians. The US has never recognized Palestine the way China and Russia do. While it is true there is a Muslim congresswoman in the Democratic party, she is considered fringe and not mainstream. Democratic mainstream hates Palestinians and do not recognize Palestine.

 

[Strigon]

The US is in general hostile to Palestinians. The US has never recognized Palestine the way China and Russia do. While it is true there is a Muslim congresswoman in the Democratic party, she is considered fringe and not mainstream. Democratic mainstream hates Palestinians and do not recognize Palestine.

Not just the US, but even the neighboring Muslim countries are hostile towards them.

The only way is to have more sympathetic representation no matter how you want to view it and that's def not going to start with the presidency.

 

[j_hungary]

I dont undestand the USA system but could her group not win "some" seats in the senate/congress such that Jill can become a power broker? She wont wint out right, but is there a chance she can make a difference?

President has no control on both house, their office is separated.

If you vote for Stein, you vote for her, same with Trump and Harris, you need to vote separately (albeit on the same form) on congress, senate and state election.

Unlike British parliament system there are no hung parliament nor power broker, there can be independent congressmen and senator. But as long as you don't get to a point where you need them to achieve supermajority (Which is very, VERY rare as this is our forefather designed that way), the independent are pointless.

US is unlike UK or Australia, the American is not a winner take all system (where the same party control Prime Minister Office, Upper and Lower house), you can have a President on one party and the houses on the other.