Hussain
Trusted Member
When did Iran become a member of the Arab League ?
BRICS adds more members
- Thread starter Yommie
- Start date
Hussain
Trusted Member
guy is clueless as to how big and inflated Saudi ego is......
Saudi Arabia is a Sunni country in Arab league as. "Khalifa". While Iran is our Cold War ally.
Iran has been firmly supporting our NAM efforts against NATO...
I would favour at least temporary representation of Shia's in Arab league as Khalifa by Tehran
Thanks
Hussain
Trusted Member
Arab League is a "dead on arrival" league. No need for any representation. All they can do is talk....
Muji.Iqbal
Trusted Member
Bhojpuranchali
SpeedLimited
Why does Pakistan, which views India as an adversary, want to join a group where India plays such a significant role as a founding member? Additionally, India holds a 20% stake in the BRICS bank.
.
how you people see my post#13?
we find, as per our Cold War Experience with our NAM efforts against NATO, the Beijing and the Moscow signed NPT with other joined P5s while supporting all the good and bad of NATO against developing world.........
the Beijing and Moscow signed NPT with other P5s and supported many crimes against developing countries.....
only '2' countries, the Pakistan and the India never signed NPT and i would say, the power not to sign NPT was more than those who signed NPT including P5s, who supported 'wrong' against developing countries.
the Tehran, the meaning of capital of Iran, and North Korea and Israel first signed NPT and afterword they deceived it. hence they faced sanctions.....
as per title of this thread, Pakistan had "Jayaz Haq" for nuclear tests in 1998,
,along with India's nuke test in 1974. and hence, India has given full official recognition to Pakistan's holding of Nuclear, as nuclear power.......and as mentioned above, and hence, the same India's favour Iran and N Korea couldn't get as they were missing 'Jayaz Haq',. here, its worth mentioning that Israel is US's man......
.
I would say, we would say, the Arab League is that Religious Power which Christianity couldn't show as "World Religion". here, the Hindus, Buddhists, Chinese, Russians, Jews would be said to be "regional culture".
worth mentioning, we have been discussing that South Americans have been struggling with "Foreign Gods", which includes Christianity and Islam both, the only 2 options they have. the people like 'Mike Tyson' has been converted to Islam from Christianity. he was having English name also.....
here, its worth saying, the Chinese, Hindus, Buddhists, Russians, Jews type "regional cultures" are having "Home God"
as per the topic, we read in Australian newspapers that Nuclear Pakistan is "Nuclear Saudi Arabia", how would you see this Western perception
Muji.Iqbal
Trusted Member
Same reason why India is in SCO.
Good thing Pakistan blocked India's entry into OIC.
Bhojpuranchali
SpeedLimited
That’s why OIC is irrelevant; however, any organization formed solely on the basis of religion is bound to be irrelevant in broader geopolitics. Still, India’s inclusion in the OIC would have at least provided it with some soft power and recognition.
Muji.Iqbal
Trusted Member
No retard, OIC is very much relevant. What a stupid logic, just because India is not in OIC, makes OIC irrelevant. LOL.
OIC is the collective voice of Muslim majority countries to promote Muslim interests and dialogue.
With India not in it, it shows Muslim majority countries support Pakistan's stance in OIC.
Pakistan Space Agency
Elite Member
Hindustan has blocked Pakistan joining BRICS.
Muji.Iqbal
Trusted Member
Really. Good that we blocked India from joining OIC as well.
But I believe Pakistan should be a part of BRICS as well.
Bhojpuranchali
SpeedLimited
There is no such thing as a ‘Muslim interest.’ As I mentioned earlier, any organization formed on the basis of religion will have no influence in geopolitics, as geopolitics has no religion.
agidest
Registered Member
Unfortunately for you, BRICS works on consensus.
India literally has a veto. Pakistan can't join unless India agrees.
