ICE raids are legal which means that, if you are picked up in an ICE raid, then they can ask you to provide documentation of your right to be in the US. You do not have to carry the documents on you at all times but, if a judge has decided that ICE has justifiable cause to question you, then you must produce documents during the due process.
Just saying "I am a US citizen" won't cut it.
P.S. There used to be border control checkpoints when driving up from San Diego to Los Angeles on I5. I always got waved along so I don't know what they ask and what they are looking for. Maybe just drugs or truck full of illegals.
ICE raid required a warrant, they can't just ask you for ID in the street........Law Enforcement (ICE included) cant enter a private premises without a warrant, unless they are setting up Raid in Federal Building or Federal Place (Such as Federal Plaza) They need a warrant to enter a home or a private business.
Interior Checkpoint aren't supposed to check your ID, you don't need to produce your ID, they were supposed to be limited to asking brief question and a brief detain. That's the same right you have when a cop asks you for ID on the street, they would need a probable cause to actually detain you and have you produced such document.
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte 1976 established that these checkpoint contact should be minimal, and supposed to wave local resident, regardless of citizenship and only stop cars that were suspicious (Which give them the probable cause that illegal activities had occurred) at the secondary interview area.
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
supreme.justia.com
I already wrote exactly that. Several times.
When you overstay your visa, you have breached the visa condition.
You keep repeating exactly what I wrote and then claiming you have dome something else.
How? Illegal
DON'T have visa.........
Show me where this website said what you claim.
www.ice.gov
ICE ERO removes noncitizens from the United States who are subject to a final order of removal. ERO facilitates the processing of undocumented noncitizens through the immigration court system and coordinates their departure from the United States
(bolded by me)
LEA are not stupid. They know the tricks people play, they know the law, and they know how to deal with the matter. The judges involved know these things far better than you do. The ACLU watches everything like a hawk so I am sure it's all legal and aboveboard.
Already addressed above. ICE raids within the US are legal and people get deported after due process.
These all are going around and around with the definition of "Out of Status" which you still have not been proven being undoc illegal alone is out of status.
First, it requires a final order of removal from aa judge as I said in the beginning.
ICE ERO removes noncitizens from the United States who are subject to a final order of removal.
CIS/ICE can't remove anyone that was not listed in 8 USC 1227 unless there is an order from a judge, that is the reason why we have this problem since 1996 to begin with
On the other hand, as I said,
it is a moot point to begin with, even if I conceded and these people are out of status and subject to forcible removal and being removed and bar from re-entry for up to 10 years. Then what? They already married a US Citizens and already had children that were US Citizens, they can simply apply for a green card and get status in 10 years (Usually less than 10 years).
Again, you are arguing this is a medium to long play, so as I ask you the 5th time, if this is a long play, how is it different giving them green card now and wait 5 years so they can vote, than have then deport now and give them green card in 10 years so they can be a citizen and can vote?
Again,
THESE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET GREEN CARD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
I know the definition very well, YOU don't.
Grooming requires a conscious effort to change someone's behavior.
Nobody is saying that the Democratic Party is grooming anybody to control their vote.
That is your non sequitur fabrication that you injected here for reasons that readers can guess for themselves.
Dude, I literally just quote you the oxford dictionary definition of grooming.
So you are saying you know the definition better than Oxford Dictionary?
And aren't what you are arguing is the Dem making a conscious effort to change the status for illegal alien in order to facilitate to vote for them? If this is not then what are you arguing or are you saying they accidentally try to make law that favour them in election??
lol
