Genocide of Indigenous Peoples

[Beijingwalker]

I wouldn't call that, not because they are the same people or different like you claim. I wouldn't call that because that is not a total prosecution of either side. Being the same or different people have no bearing on what's been call genocide. Nor was all war automatically called Genocide.

Would you call Korean War genocide? It's white/other against Asian
Would you call Vietnam War genocide? It's white/other against Asian
Would you call Falkland war Genocide? It's White/other against Hispanic.
Would you call Congo Civil War Genocide? It's White/African against African.

If US troops killed off almost all the locals like what they did to the native American Indians or Qing dynasty did to Dzungars, they would be genocides.
As for what the word genocide exactly means, we have other poster posted in several times already in this thread.

 

[passer-by]

If US troops killed off almost all the locals like what they did to the native American Indians or Qing dynasty did to Dzungars, they would be genocides.
As for what the word genocide exactly means, we have other poster posted in several times already in this thread.

Again, Indigenous population rose 3700% since 1790, when US was formed. So if by your own definition, that's not genocide either, because that is the exact opposite to pushing the indigenous population to extinction.

 

[Beijingwalker]

Again, Indigenous population rose 3700% since 1790 til 1900, when US was formed. So if by your own definition, that's not genocide, because that is the exact opposite to pushing the indigenous population to extinction.

This is enough to be called genocide

Between 1800 and 1900, the American Indians lost more than half of their population, and their proportion in the total U.S. population dropped from 10.15% to 0.31%. Throughout the 19th century, while the U.S. population grew by 20-30% every 10 years, the Indian population experienced a precipitous decline.

 

[Beijingwalker]

Which US states now are still predominantly inhabited by the native Indians?

 

[passer-by]

This is enough to be called genocide

Between 1800 and 1900, the American Indians lost more than half of their population, and their proportion in the total U.S. population dropped from 10.15% to 0.31%. Throughout the 19th century, while the U.S. population grew by 20-30% every 10 years, the Indian population experienced a precipitous decline.

No, your definition as per yourself said is

If US troops killed off almost all the locals like what they did to the native American Indians or Qing dynasty did to Dzungars, they would be genocides.

3700% rise is NOT almost killed off all local. Even 50% decrease at the beginning is NOT almost killed off all local.

 

[شَاھِین شَاہِ لَولَاک]

The difference is that in North America this is history from centuries past. In China it is now in the 21st century..

than y do u support the zionist claim over Palestine.

 

[Beijingwalker]

No, your definition as per yourself said is

Not my definition, the real meaning of genocide

 

[Beijingwalker]

 

[Beijingwalker]

American Genocide Podcast - Illuminative -

American Genocide podcast about the crimes of Native American boarding schools, a story that is personal to many in our community.

illuminative.org

 

[passer-by]

Not my definition, the real meaning of genocide

View attachment 11801

That picture didn't said what you said here. Tell me where in the picture it said

If US troops killed off almost all the locals like what they did to the native American Indians or Qing dynasty did to Dzungars, they would be genocides.

 

[Beijingwalker]

That picture didn't said what you said here. Tell me where in the picture it said

This is what the rightful owners of America have to say

 

[Beijingwalker]

 

[passer-by]

This is what the rightful owners of America have to say

View attachment 11803

It still say that, nor was it actually said anything about Genocide.

If you are being this intellectual dishonest, I will have to part way with you, because your point is selective, and biased you believe one thing applies to another but did not apply to the same condition as long as it benefit your argument.

 

[Beijingwalker]

It still say that, nor was it actually said anything about Genocide.

If you are being this intellectual dishonest, I will have to part way with you, because your point is selective, and biased you believe one thing applies to another but did not apply to the same condition as long as it benefit your argument.

Your mind is so weird, everyone knows what genocide mean but you don't, someone had posted the definition of genocide several times in this thread just for you.

 

[passer-by]

You mind is so weird, everyone knows what genocide mean but you don't, someone had posted the definition of genocide several times in this thread just for you.

This is the ICJ - International Court of Justice definition of Genocide as per UN Charter Article 93, I do not run on uncles and aunties's definition of "Genocide"

https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Universal-Genocide-Q-A-FINAL-Advocacy-analysis-brief-2018-ENG.pdf#:~:text=%E2%80%9CGenocide%20is%20a%20denial%20of%20the%20right%20of,the%20spirit%20and%20aims%20of%20the%20United%20Nations.%E2%80%9D1

“Genocide is a denial of the right of existence of entire human groups, as homicide is the denial of the right to live of individual human beings; such denial of the right of existence shocks the conscience of mankind, results in great losses to humanity in the form of cultural and other contributions represented by these human groups, and is contrary to moral law and to the spirit and aims of the United Nations.”1

And as I said, you are being intellectual dishonest, Goodbye