925boy
Elite Member
US can't really destroy any entity today- it didnt destroy AQ, Taliban, Assad, Iraqi insurgents, ISIS, Houthis, and none of those groups is as strong as Iran is.Not before USdestroysdamages Iran.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
US can't really destroy any entity today- it didnt destroy AQ, Taliban, Assad, Iraqi insurgents, ISIS, Houthis, and none of those groups is as strong as Iran is.Not before USdestroysdamages Iran.
More genocide going to happen in Canada now:-
![]()
Haaretz: Over 10,000 Israelis have migrated to Canada this year
The number of Israelis migrating to Canada has surged dramatically as the occupying regime pushes ahead with its genocide in the Gaza Strip and carnage in Lebanon, a new report says.www.presstv.ir
They will claim that God had reserved Canada for them and everybody else must leave.
Ummmmm.....true. But lets give Pakistan some credit in this art- its found a way to curry favors, resources, money, weapons protection, investment etc from BOTH US and China. Seems like China dominates Pakistan's economy while US dominates Pakistan's govt and military.Yes you are correct.
Pakistan is not a puppet state but more someone who compromises certain interests in return for money and weapons.
USA interests is keep people fighting each other in the land they parasite resources, because it keeps a low internal resources consumption.US can't really destroy any entity today- it didnt destroy AQ, Taliban, Assad, Iraqi insurgents, ISIS, Houthis, and none of those groups is as strong as Iran is.
Walla website, quoting the Israeli army: We have a shortage of reserve forces estimated at tens of thousands, and this causes the inability to complete tasks within the framework of the war.
Done with your sarcasm? Yes, it is important to fight on the ground to occupy and hold land! And that requires fighting like 'men' otherwise there wouldn't be infantry divisions. And to occupy and hold Gaza, Israelis will have to fight like 'men', which they are not.
…
There was no sarcasm at all, in intent. If it came out in reality I withdraw it.
But my message stands. Battles are won on training, logistics, strategy, tactics and the application of maximum force at a point.
That’s how it has always been, despite romanticised versions of man to man or single combat.
Should the Iran Iraq war, World War 2, French Vietnamese wars have been fought man to man?
That was my point.
Yes what matters is national, unit and individual morale during war time. This impels a person to fight harder or not at all.
One can argue that the Iranian or Hezbollah’s morale is higher than Israeli resolve (and that’s an interesting debate) but that, realistically, as about man to man as it gets.
I see what you are saying but not only you but Israelis, until recently, missed the point about this is not a 'conventional' war and one cannot absolutely apply the 'conventional' war logic to this conflict.
It is already obvious that the same IDF which famously won the 'Six Day War' is bogged down in Gaza and taking significant losses in southern Lebanon. The inability of the IDF to engage 'man to man' is IDF's big weakness. There is no doubt about it that Israelis realize their conventional limitations in an assymetrical war and thus they want to drag the Americans in an ultimately futile attempt to win the war.
You have applied very wrong paradigms for this conflict, in short.

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.