Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

There were rumors 40000 Houthis were close to Lebanon ready to join.
Unless they went to Kursk Oblast, they are ready
 
Last edited:
Say that to sheikh akram al-kaabi not me
Russia start ww2 style campaign in idleb
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Typical Fog of war.

Problem is not manpower. There is over 300K SAA+ NDF + allied militias in Syria. Except they are not sitting in Aleppo, why? That you must ask Iran, Russia, and Syria.

Ask yourself if it’s manpower problem
then how Syria survived when it was fighting in Daraa, Aleppo, Dier ez Zoor, Idlib, Palmyra against 100,000+ terrorists and ISIS all at same time from 2012-2018, but suddenly cannot fight on one smaller regional front? SAA has had over 4 years to replenish its ranks.

Again problem is not manpower. They were simply caught not defending the front and not properly set up for a large counter attack. The rapid gains are due to Syrian forces simply retreating back to regroup. My guess is whatever was on the frontline was similar in capability to MP (military police) or peace keeping force.

The issue lies with Iran and Russia not detecting the mobilization of this counter attack via ISR and SIGINT before it began.
 
Typical Fog of war.

Problem is not manpower. There is over 300K SAA+ NDF + allied militias in Syria. Except they are not sitting in Aleppo, why? That you must ask Iran, Russia, and Syria.

Ask yourself if it’s manpower problem
then how Syria survived when it was fighting in Daraa, Aleppo, Dier ez Zoor, Idlib, Palmyra against 100,000+ terrorists and ISIS all at same time from 2012-2018, but suddenly cannot fight on one smaller regional front? SAA has had over 4 years to replenish its ranks.

Again problem is not manpower. They were simply caught not defending the front and not properly set up for a large counter attack. The rapid gains are due to Syrian forces simply retreating back to regroup. My guess is whatever was on the frontline was similar in capability to MP (military police) or peace keeping force.

The issue lies with Iran and Russia not detecting the mobilization of this counter attack via ISR and SIGINT before it began.
The mobilization was detected 2-3 month ago
 
At last some real man are being sent into Syria
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

US won't let that happen, u need to pass US in the area first 😁
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
I remember when Aleppo fell a decade ago. Among you guys, only @Hack-Hook is still here.

It was very different. The belief was that rebels are bringing Islam and peace and Iran is the barrier to peace.

This time:
Now nobody likes them this time. They don’t believe in their Islam or democracy or Arabism.

If they would, Damascus would be all riot today.
 
The mobilization was detected 2-3 month ago

60000 can be sent from Iraq if needed.
Two full Iraqi brigades went to the border, still on reserve

These statements logically contradict each other.

Why weren’t such large scale reinforcements (if available as you say) sent before the counter attack operation by the terrorists?

I don’t think things are as simple and transparent as you say. There is likely behind the scenes developments we are not seeing. Given how much resources/blood Iran and her allies poured into securing Aleppo years ago, they wouldn’t just “wait and see” if reinforcements are needed.

Now once again Iran and its legions of shock troops have to come in and clean up this unnecessary and completely preventable mess.
 
Israel can find all of Hezbollah’s senior leadership hiding in various bunkers 30 meters underground in 1 month, yet Iran cannot find Jolani after 10 years.
Iran probably knows Joulani is in Turkey, like other ISIS leaders Turkey hosts and protects, so its not easy for Iran to get him, especially not without destabilizing relations with Turkey.
 
These statements logically contradict each other.

Why weren’t such large scale reinforcements (if available as you say) sent before the counter attack operation by the terrorists?

I don’t think things are as simple and transparent as you say. There is likely behind the scenes developments we are not seeing. Given how much resources/blood Iran and her allies poured into securing Aleppo years ago, they wouldn’t just “wait and see” if reinforcements are needed.

Now once again Iran and its legions of shock troops have to come in and clean up this unnecessary and completely preventable mess.

Their presence was and is more crucial at Damascus - Albukamal line.

Still it will be Syrians who will get deployed to free Aleppo. NDF, SAA

Don’t focus on what happened.
Focus on what can happen next and be one step forward.

در چیل ترد گفتم
خیلی اتفاق‌های مهم میشه اضافه بشه

Israel can find all of Hezbollah’s senior leadership hiding in various bunkers 30 meters underground in 1 month, yet Iran cannot find Jolani after 10 years.

He is as replaceable as HZ leaders of not more replaceable.
Only good for propaganda
 
Reinforcements are being sent to the front. This will all be reversed eventually, but it will cost Iran in blood and treasure.
But is Assad preventing/stalling Iran from actually restoring the SAA and its effective military capabilities because of "other strategic considerations"?

I'm asking because all other Axis of resistance forces are all ready and prepared today, EXCEPT SYRIA- Houthis are ready, PMU in Iraq has been ready and firing into Israel, hezbollah is still capable despite ISrael trying to decapitate it and its leadership- so i dont understand why SAA stays in a bad state- did US/NATO threaten Assad with removal if he built the SAA back up? smfh. Iran may need to find another strategic replacement for Assad once thats possible.
 
This is why I dont believe in frozen conflicts. SAA got easy and HTS/SNA alliance pounced after taking their time and now you see them with drones, loitering munitions, proper HQs coordinating ops. Someone Turkey and NATO did a proper investment lol
Yes Turkey has NATO protection and authorization to manage ISIS and other Middle east TErrorists like HTS for NATO, but Iran should developed a plan to cut Turkey's military influence and capacity in the middle east, by taking action against Turkish interests and proxies outside Turkey- probably Iraq. Turkey will end up proving to be an enemy of Iran and its interests, mark my words.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top