PAF J-35AE - News, Updates and Discussions

Lmao

Pot calling the kettle black.

How's that SCAR that PA was supposed to pick?
Well discussions took place but after initially agreeing to TOT they backed off. Also when Army officially announced induction of any new assault rifle. If you are blind and hilariously ignorant enough to categorize our discussion and an official announcement by PAF Chief plus dozens of PAF official videos in same category and carrying same weight than Mr you just proved my point.
 
Reading his initial claim, and his secondary follow on made me come to that conclusion.

Why are you even involved if all you're going to do is accuse me for allegedly arguing with someone else?

Either give me something substantial, or move on.
You’re the one who was pushing all this inferior J-10c for PAF crap as fact, Michael’s informative posts discredited that bullshit completely- since you were the one selling this rubbish to everyone, you’re the one who needs to provide something ‘substantial’ or move on.
I’m involved because I find it hugely annoying when someone completely fabricates things, pushes them as facts and therefore misleads others.
 
Not withstanding the fabricated bullcrap from some and to get back to the topic of this thread, if and when PAF acquires the J35 while it may well be a version modified to the PAF’s specific requirements, it will NOT be a toned down / less capable bird for export.
 
Not withstanding the fabricated bullcrap from some and to get back to the topic of this thread, if and when PAF acquires the J35 while it may well be a version modified to the PAF’s specific requirements, it will NOT be a toned down / less capable bird for export.
If you keep peddling your own opinions as fact ill start deleting your posts, ive had enough of your brigade bringing down the quality of this thread with nonsense. As you can tell, nobody with an iota of credibility uses this thread anymore because you guys have turned it into a mess of crap flinging and delusion. Take this as a warning for not only yourself, but the other posters engaging in this nonsense.

If you want to talk facts, bring facts, if you want to have a sensible discussion, then also feel free to do so, if you want to talk delusion, then do it elsewhere.
 
Well discussions took place but after initially agreeing to TOT they backed off. Also when Army officially announced induction of any new assault rifle. If you are blind and hilariously ignorant enough to categorize our discussion and an official announcement by PAF Chief plus dozens of PAF official videos in same category and carrying same weight than Mr you just proved my point.
Actually, it's the opposite.

You were the one who said it was a done deal, not me.

Also, the PAF chief said nothing about the type of J-35 PAF would induct, he just said it would be inducted, and he used the FC-31 moniker, which means we're all even less sure of the type.
 
You’re the one who was pushing all this inferior J-10c for PAF crap as fact, Michael’s informative posts discredited that bullshit completely- since you were the one selling this rubbish to everyone, you’re the one who needs to provide something ‘substantial’ or move on.
I’m involved because I find it hugely annoying when someone completely fabricates things, pushes them as facts and therefore misleads others.
Once again, you're just arguing for the sake of arguing.

I gave multiple examples, and all you got was a single post that doesn't even discredit me, and only proves my point.
 
A nice video on the FGFs undermining S-400s. No wonder the PAF has gone mad to acquire them. FGFs, in unison with other high tech assets, are indeed game changers. It's no surprise that Bharat is now showing her "chauvinism" vis-a-vis BD. The "Last Afgans" are now the first and last line of offense against Pak...

Having and not having FGFs aren't the same.....


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
If you keep peddling your own opinions as fact ill start deleting your posts, ive had enough of your brigade bringing down the quality of this thread with nonsense. As you can tell, nobody with an iota of credibility uses this thread anymore because you guys have turned it into a mess of crap flinging and delusion. Take this as a warning for not only yourself, but the other posters engaging in this nonsense.

If you want to talk facts, bring facts, if you want to have a sensible discussion, then also feel free to do so, if you want to talk delusion, then do it elsewhere.
So misinformation should not be questioned or challenged? What delusion in my post are you referring to? Regardless, Please delete whichever / all of my posts you deem inappropriate.
 
So misinformation should not be questioned or challenged? What delusion in my post are you referring to? Regardless, Please delete whichever / all of my posts you deem inappropriate.
via your challenge of misinformation, you yourself are spreading misinformation. Consider the topic of export version vs not closed, its a fruitless argument, you think you're right, others think otherwise, and those who actually know have ditched the forum. Just a few pages ago there was actual decent discussion.
 
Haci’s J-35 video, Inshallah soon in PAF colors, similar to how the J-10 in PAF colors showed up in his J-10 video.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I still think IOC by December 2026.

It will be interesting to see if PAF gets the “full fat” version and not the export version.
Hi,

Is azerbaijan getting the "expprt version"---?

Did Israel get the F35 " export version "---?
 
Except his point ended up proving me right. Pakistanndoes not get the Chinese version that so many people say. The Chinese automatically remove top secret tech, which is an automatic downgrade.

Bro, there is not really a downgraded version in the sense that some systems are entirely removed and different systems are installed in the export version. Because many of these systems are so complex that is like human eye. You can't have 80% or 90% of its hardware to make it function for its role. You need 100% of it. And developing less capable alternative solutions would cost extra time and money. Even if it leverages lots of already mature technologies from the original program.

So instead, given today 5th gen platforms are fully digitized and in the end of the day performance of every hardware is Ultimately defined by its software, from mission computer to aesa radar, ew system, EOTS what's not, this is were they usually put restrictions on performance perimeters for export versions.

For example, F35 procured by US allies has the very same engine, Radar, EW, EOT, integrated central processor, fusion engine, etc. However, software is different for domestic model. USAF once wanted to buy 8 F35 meant for Türkiye without changing any major hardware with software and some minor hardware modifications.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top