Turkey Syria - News & Updates

Syria will take legal measures. With assistance of allies.
..
..

Ahmad al-Sharaa, Commander-in-Chief of the New Syrian Administration: The Israeli side violated the 1974 ceasefire agreement

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
xbat said:
US forces are deploying in ayn el arab, now understtod why BLINKEN visited Turkey
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

To threaten and warn Turkey. What else ?
 
US bases will remain in Syria to protect Kurds and keep an eye on ISIS and Alquida activities.
 
HAIDER said:
US bases will remain in Syria to protect Kurds and keep an eye on ISIS and Alquida activities.
Click to expand...
You want them to remain? LOL

They want to stay to prevent a unified Syrian State. There is no ISIS. They'll create a few cells on the fly when it's requested.
 
HAIDER said:
US bases will remain in Syria to protect Kurds and keep an eye on ISIS and Alquida activities.
Click to expand...

They don't have capacity to keep the PKK holding all the arab lands without a revolt.

Unless they are planning to bomb uprisings to force PKK control over people, this isn't a good strategy for long term control.
 
A number of fighters affiliated with the Military Operations Department were martyred after falling into an ambush by an armed group of thugs and remnants of the ousted regime near Al-Muzayri'a in the Jableh area in the Latakia countryside.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
hyperman said:
They don't have capacity to keep the PKK holding all the arab lands without a revolt.

Unless they are planning to bomb uprisings to force PKK control over people, this isn't a good strategy for long term control.
Click to expand...
I think he's happy to have them remain there. Some of the AoR guys are very inconsistent. They support US military deployments and bases in some cases but not others. In this case they see it as beneficial to their axis to have a fragmented Syria instead of a unified Syria led by Sunni government.

Which I see as misguided and sectarian. It would benefit AoR to not alienate the Syrian government and people and instead work with them. Mature and non-sectarian leadership is needed in AoR.
 
Falcon29 said:
It would benefit AoR to not alienate the Syrian government and people and instead work with them. Mature and non-sectarian leadership is needed in AoR.
Click to expand...

From the leadership yes, In some ways Iran is already reorganizing with the new reality. But their Troll network, that has a mind of its own, their trolls have Built their whole identity on Russia, Iran, Assad, PMU Hezbollah.

Assad is gona and Russia and Iran's stuff is complicated(Israel), so the trolls don't know where the alignment will go, so they go to their default position for the last 15 years, which is attack the opposition, attack turkey, etc etc, as if the old alignments and interests are still present/in play. Some of them have developed to the point of outright Sunni Islam Hatred and Hatred of Turkey, to where they function under anything of benefit to turkey, is bad, and anything negative of Turkey is good. And they blindly support anyone in conflict with Turkey.

Morons are supporting the PKK against Turkey, not realizing that the PKK is a US/Israel conduit in the region. Why? b/c fk Turkey that why, no other reason, even if its potentially harming to them. lol

This war has fked up the identities of so many people, and now with the collapse, they don't know how to rebuild.

Some still idolize Assad like he is some fallen hero, rather than a coward who burned everything to the ground to survive, and when even that wasn't enough, he ran.
 
hyperman said:
I've seen it on twitter, quite a few Alawite Assadists calling for a breakaway state in Latakia and Tartus under the protection of the two Russian bases, when only a few weeks back they were projecting themselves as "Syrian Nationalists".
Click to expand...
Right now do you blame them? What's left for them? 12 years of war managed nothing. They know nobody can take back the entire country now for them. Nobody's going to restore the previous government(with or without Bashar)now,so the only thing they can ask for,at least for now,is to be protected and have their own seperate or autonomous State. Imagine how many thousands of soldiers and volunteers they've lost in the war. It's impossible for loyalists to regain the country now. Besides,the people are fed up with the war.
 
hyperman said:
So Assad tactically supported them against other Syrian(syrians under the majority btw), b/c he saw them at the very least as a tactical tool. And if he was successful in destroying his main opponents, then he could think about taking out the separatists he created, and if he wasn't successful in taking out the other Syrians(majority), the separatist entity is still an ally in a power balancing scheme, whether in a stalemate freeze, or in a permanent breakage.

When you understand these axioms, you understand this conflict and his tactical play better.
Click to expand...
E so what's the problem? It's a good strategy. Although...too little too late. I'll bet Bashar had little freedom in taking such decisions and all the hardliners in the government were stubbornly saying "no,no".
 
Foinikas said:
Right now do you blame them? What's left for them? 12 years of war managed nothing. They know nobody can take back the entire country now for them. Nobody's going to restore the previous government(with or without Bashar)now,so the only thing they can ask for,at least for now,is to be protected and have their own seperate or autonomous State. Imagine how many thousands of soldiers and volunteers they've lost in the war. It's impossible for loyalists to regain the country now. Besides,the people are fed up with the war.
Click to expand...


This coud happen as Russia + loyal Alwaite forces are more than strong enough to protect the west coast from HTS.

Remember the best equipped SAA units were always Alawite.
 
Foinikas said:
E so what's the problem? It's a good strategy. Although...too little too late. I'll bet Bashar had little freedom in taking such decisions and all the hardliners in the government were stubbornly saying "no,no".
Click to expand...

"Good Strategy"

Sure. But not Syrian Nationalist(which is my point, he doesn't give a shit about Syria, its about himself and the interests of his family and then his sect, over Syrian overall interests). lol

And the "hardliners" lol bro, there ain't no sunnis in that regime of significance to say no, all the significant Posts regarding security and intelligence are all held by Alawites, this is Syria 101 knowledge. Daddy ensured that when he did the coup, he purged all the Sunnis in the Baathist party that could be a potential challenge both to him and Alawite power.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top