Syrian Civil War and The future of Syria after liberation

muhammed45 said:
Use your Logic.

Turkey is an extension of NATO, USA's military arm. How can you even suppose that they represent army of Islam?

Russians have never been a part of Roman empire. The term Rome points to an strong force that could be stronger than anyone else. Not other than USA and its regional dogs including Israel.
Click to expand...

Logic tells me that Turks are as much Muslim as Iranians or Pakistanis. I reallize that they've been very secular since Ataturk abolished the Ottoman Caliphate, and, without meaning to offend Turkish brothers, I suspect that he was a crypto-Jew, a donmeh.

However, I've been to Turkey, and it comes across as a 100% Muslim country to me. In Istanbul the number of beautiful mosques is endless. In smaller cities most people are practicing Muslims, with women in hijab.

I would caution fellow Muslims from calling Turks non-Muslim.

Russia, on the other hand, is a Judeo-Christian country with a history of invading and occupying Muslim lands, committing genocide against Muslims (Circassian Genocide), and suppressing the practice of Islam. That continues to this day. Russia has extensive links with Israel.

Even in Syria the Russians were bombing and killing Muslims, while they didn't lift a finger to stop Israel from bombing Syria. So, both Israel and Russia were bombing Syria together.

I would caution fellow Muslims from thinking that Russia is on the side of Muslims.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Tamerlane said:
Logic tells me that Turks are as much Muslim as Iranians or Pakistanis. I reallize that they've been very secular since Ataturk abolished the Ottoman Caliphate, and, without meaning to offend Turkish brothers, I suspect that he was a crypto-Jew, a donmeh.

However, I've been to Turkey, and it comes across as a 100% Muslim country to me. In Istanbul the number of beautiful mosques is endless. In smaller cities most people are practicing Muslims, with women in hijab.

I would caution fellow Muslims from calling Turks non-Muslim.

Russia, on the other hand, is a Judeo-Christian country with a history of invading and occupying Muslim lands, committing genocide against Muslims (Circassian Genocide), and suppressing the practice of Islam. That continues to this day. Russia has extensive links with Israel.

Even in Syria the Russians were bombing and killing Muslims, while they didn't lift a finger to stop Israel from bombing Syria. So, both Israel and Russia were bombing Syria together.

I would caution fellow Muslims from thinking that Russia is on the side of Muslims.
Click to expand...
I don't deny most of your points. Problem is, some of us are misled.

Know for sure, there are liberals among us Iranians that are worse than Zionists. Point is, Iran today is led by one of descendants of prophet. That's what matters. Even if all of a sudden all of Iranians turn to anti Islam liberals, he will remain who he is.

Turkey is led by NATO, even if all of Muslims in Turkey are saints, one factor causes them to be misled and it is NATO membership. They are led by NATO, every move that they make is coordinated with NATO. They will tear Syria apart under US Supervision. However, serving evil doesn't bring you success but misery. Something that they gonna learn the hard way.

Russians have their own interests. Their history can be divided into a couple periods. Most important ones are before Bolsheviks, during Bolsheviks and after Bolsheviks. Russians are not saints either. But at least they are a resisting factor against NATO. Their relationship with Israel is because of presence of Russian Jews in Israel. Believe it or not, Israeli Zionists with Russian roots have inflicted most damages on today's post Bolshevik Russia. Something that shortsighted leaders of Russua ignored for years and it bites them today.

I say it again, the term Rome points to USA and Israel. Ikhwan ul-Turk is a mysterious phrase and hard to explain but it can be a reminder of today's Turkey with its Ikhwani angles.

No matter how hard we try to exemplify Hadith-s in our own favor, sun never remains behind clouds. Almighty will show his light when the time comes.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Yommie said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

It is funny "American-themed" translates to "Alcohol flowing, men and women dancing together". No one says things like "Consent of the Governed". Jefferson would be laughing in his grave.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


I'm just waiting for the Assadists to start calling Hamas Zionist agents. lol
 

No longer Assad’s mouthpiece, Syrian media face uncertainty​


The Frontier Post
No-longer-Assads-mouthpiece-Syrian-media-face-uncertainty.jpg



DAMASCUS (AFP): Syrian media outlets which trumpeted the glories of Bashar al-Assad’s oppressive rule quickly adopted revolutionary fervour after his ouster, but uncertainty shadows the sector.

For decades, Syria’s ruling Baath party and the Assad family dynasty heavily curtailed all aspects of daily life, including freedom of the press and expression.

The media became a tool of those in power.

When a rebel alliance led by the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) took Damascus on December 8, announcing Assad’s overthrow after an 11-day offensive, confusion reigned and state news agency SANA, the government mouthpiece, went silent for more than 24 hours.

State television broadcasts old programs instead of fast-evolving events. Then a group of men in the news studio read a statement from the “Damascus Conquest operations room”. They announced “the liberation of the city of Damascus and the fall of the tyrant Bashar al-Assad”.

Those words would have been unimaginable two weeks earlier.

For hours, the channel then broadcasts a full-screen message on a red background announcing the “victory of the great Syrian revolution”.

Foreign media — whose entry to the country was heavily restricted under Assad — flooded in as soon as he was toppled, rushing to notorious prisons and other sites that were out of reach under his paranoid rule.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 12 (members: 0, guests: 12)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top