View attachment 95018
View attachment 95019
name me one that does not have it
and don't change the discussion if you tag me mage me mor real reason our discussion was not for using underground base for missiles, it was for storing fighter jet and interceptors like F-14 and Su-35 inside them. why you were in Favour of them i pointed those bases are only good for strike aircraft and bombers. for fighters is far better to disperse them around country and but then in reinforced shelters in various bases around country as we have more 60 airbase, we need to build several reinforced shelters inside each of them
A GBU-24? A laser guided unpowered bomb? You realize an aircraft laser designator has like 8 nm range? So you must be assuming Iran’s lost the entire airspace for such a weapon to be used at such close range to target.
I asked for what STAND OFF PGM can hit directly from above with reliable accuracy safely. By suggesting GBU-24 or any short range laser guided bombs, you are already assuming Iran lost the airspace and a F-16 can sit above the underground base dropping laser guided bombs. It’s a stupid answer, Iran isn’t Gaza.
The whole point of underground air bases is to keep planes protected as long as possible and air space from falling to enemy as long as possible. So U.S. or Israel would have to resort to stand off weapons (long range CMs or air launched BMs) all of which would rely on GPS to hit that small window between structure and door from above, which Russia has shown is easily jammable. As both Syria and Israel have shown, hitting reinforced roads or runways with CMs or BMs does nothing to stop enemy from quickly repairing.
As we already discussed many times, Spreading planes around does nothing against a country with thousands of fighters/bombers and long range cruise missiles. You think Iran is only country that can mass fire projectiles? You think US or Israel cannot fire 300-500 cruise missiles at Iran? How would spreading planes around save the planes? You going to have highly reinforced shelters for each and every plane? How are you going to protect these additional 30+ (or more) airbases from swarm attacks? How are you going to adequately resupply them with jet fuel and bombs. It’s a logistical nightmare.
You couldn’t even protect Isfahan from losing its S300 fire control radar to a few quadcopters but now you will keep 60 airbases safe/protected/resupply during war.
It’s hilarious you think covering a few entrances at each mountain base with structures and SHORADs and other defenses is impossible, but you think concrete shelters and spreading your aircraft (and defenses) thin across many airbases will protect these planes? It’s devoid of logic. There is a reason many countries have had underground airbases (China, North Korea, Taiwan, etc).
Underground airbases are Iran’s best bet to keep its airforce safe from Israel or U.S. as long as possible.