Joe Shearer
Professional
I was waiting for you.… only about 20 years too late!
However, on the other hand, it is good to see at least progress at the speed of a glacier.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was waiting for you.… only about 20 years too late!
The Navy - most navies - don't want single-engine attack or air-superiority aircraft.LCA Navy twin seater, NP-5. This is the last LCA Navy prototype that was built. Still hoping that the Navy orders at least 8-12 of these for training pilots on carrier landing and take off.
It is the only supersonic single engine trainer capable of arrested landing and take off from a ramp on an aircraft carrier in the world.
![]()
The Navy - most navies - don't want single-engine attack or air-superiority aircraft.
Tejas Mk1 from No.18 Squadron with Elta Scorpius SPJ. Confirms that it has already entered service with the 2 Tejas Mk1 squadrons.
Image credit- Blue Pixel
![]()
Landing on a carrier will be a requirement for any Goshawk replacement regardless of what it’s current status is.The US Navy is still flying single engine T-45 Goshawks for training carrier pilots. And it'll be replacing them with other single engine trainers, albeit ones that aren't even capable of landing on a carrier in the first place. Either the T-7A, T-50 or a M-346 variant.
This isn't about using the LCA Navy as a attack or fleet defense fighter. It is about using the LCA Navy trainer for the role of training carrier pilots. TEDBF will not have a trainer variant & the Rafale M's trainer compatriot, the Rafale D that'll be acquired will only train pilots in how to fly and fight in the Rafale M.
Only the MiG-29KUB has a trainer variant that is currently used for training carrier pilots in the extremely challenging work of carrier landing.
Why dont we pitch LCA Naval as Traning Jet !The US Navy is still flying single engine T-45 Goshawks for training carrier pilots. And it'll be replacing them with other single engine trainers, albeit ones that aren't even capable of landing on a carrier in the first place. Either the T-7A, T-50 or a M-346 variant.
This isn't about using the LCA Navy as a attack or fleet defense fighter. It is about using the LCA Navy trainer for the role of training carrier pilots. TEDBF will not have a trainer variant & the Rafale M's trainer compatriot, the Rafale D that'll be acquired will only train pilots in how to fly and fight in the Rafale M.
Only the MiG-29KUB has a trainer variant that is currently used for training carrier pilots in the extremely challenging work of carrier landing.
Why dont we pitch LCA Naval as Traning Jet !
Landing on a carrier will be a requirement for any Goshawk replacement regardless of what it’s current status is.
You know my obsession in units and I really regret, the IAF got rid of all their fabulous unit badges, but is there a method to identify a certain aircraft being operated by a certain unit?
You’re thinking of a consideration vs a requirement based on it all hinging on PLM - I would love to see how deck motion, limited landing area, and the arrestor cable system can be replicated.You'd be surprised to know that it is not. Simply mimicking it on a shore based facility is being considered enough by the US Navy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.