Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | 2023- till present

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are surprised that Arabs have no positive feelings for the Iranian Wilayat al-Faqih regime that since 1979 has done nothing but create hostility, division, sectarianism, 100's of terrorist proxies/militant groups, fifth columns, unwanted meddling in internal Arab affairs (only able to meddle in unstable Arab states)? Iranian-sponsored terrorism has killed more Arabs and more Muslims than even Zionist actions since 1979. We (vast majority of educated Arabs) consider both you (Iranian regime and Iranian regime supporters) and Zionists as the same thing. Enemies that are hellbent on meddling and weakening the Arab world. You both have proven time and time again that you have no goodwill against Arabs so we do not like you. I am astonished that you find it hard to realize this simple viewpoint. It is like if an Zionist was surprised why he is disliked by Arabs.

And the biggest joke is being surprised that 30 million Syrians are heavily against the Iranian regime when the same Iranian regime for 14 + years (during the Syrian civil war) and before that for decades (they have been allies since 1979) ACTIVELY helped (very heavily) a non-Muslim Nusayri regime that killed 500.000 + Syrians and forced 10 million Syrians to flee their own country. Is there no limit to you lots shamelessness?

Now the same Iranian regime is trying to create trouble/create terrorist Nusayri proxies with the sole goal/aim to weaken the new Syrian government. For the very same reason that criminal Lebanese Shia clans allied to Hezbollah are pissed off that their captagon and drug routes are now closed due to the Al-Assad regime no longer ruling Syria. 2 days ago those criminals stoned to death 3 Syrian soldiers that they kidnapped who were fighting those criminal Lebanese clans who are trying to restore their drug trade routes.

Let me tell you another crucial thing. Arabs have nothing against Shias. They are part of us and our community and culture. Shias originated in KSA/Arab world. All their main "holy sites" are located in the Arab world. They are Arabs and part and parcel of our people. In KSA Shias make up 10-15% of the population and are part of every sector and community in the country and many Shias have high positions in the private sphere and official sphere from ministers, to leaders of huge firms (Aramco included) to the military. Same story elsewhere in the GCC.

No that you guys (even remotely) have any patent on "Shias" or speak in the name of Shias worldwide, let alone Arab Shias.

Arabs were always tolerant people hence the very large amount of minorities in the Arab world. Religious, ethnic and what not. Not to mention that Arab Christians make up the largest native Christian group in the Muslim world. Prior to the establishment of Zionist Israel, the Arab world also hosted the largest (by far) Jewish community in the Muslim world.

You lot are just using sectarianism to further Iranian geopolitical goals/ambitions. If you remove the religious angle, you have ZERO ability to meddle among Shia Arab communities. That is why your meddling will naturally go away permanently when the Iranian people topple the incompetent Iranian regime which is just a question of time.

Once that happens (it will happen), Arabs and Iranians (regardless of ethnic groups, Iran is home to millions of Arabs remember), will work together and mostly have cordial ties which is also the ground reality on the ground mostly in the GCC (where the largest Iranian diaspora is present in the world - mostly Iranian Arabs, Sunni Persians, Baloch but also Shia Persians and Lurs) are living peacefully side by side with no problems whatsoever. Migrations have occurred on both sides of the Gulf for millennia as well.

Unlike many Iranians (who are still crying about events from 1400 years ago) who are anti-Arab and anti-Muslim, most Arabs (550 million + of which 90% have no exposure or clue about Iran due to geography and history, only us Arabians and Iraqis have any exposure to you guys due to geography and history - Syrians had recently), have no hatred (or any pro or negative feelings) for Iranians (people). We have far bigger fish to fry and far larger/stronger neigbhours to worry about. For starters Europe/West that we have an almost 10.000 long coastline/border with or in the case of Arabia across the Arabian Sea a horde of 1.6 billion Indians to just mention a few examples. Let alone Zionists/Israel. Heck, even though relations are good, Turkey is far stronger too among neighbours. Or 150 million big Ethiopia (in the future one of the most populous nations out there). No offence.

Dude your writing a lot without, rejecting the Jews and their Yankee puppets from the region

Your own behavior is why the U.S is entrenched and why the Jews are getting away with their crimes

What are the Arabs going to do about it
 
Turks were not relevant in the Arab world or the Levant until 1517. The Mamluks were completely Arabized and not Turks in their majority but Circassians (Caucasian group of people which ironically is closely related to Arabs in terms of Y-DNA). The Turks of the Mamluks (means slave in Arabic - they were Central Asian Turks sold to Arabs as slaves and used as mercenaries) were from Central Asia too and not Anatolia.

The Ottomans (majority of the population were Arabs) did not fight any Jews either or Zionists. In fact Jews had disproportionate influence and power in the Ottoman bureaucracy and the Ottomans also welcomed the Jews from Al-Andalus when the Arabs lost control of Spain/Portugal after 800 years in 1492. Afterwards most Muslims and Jews were expelled. Since 1948 it has all been Arabs on this front though, this cannot be denied. I have seen no-non Arabs to date fighting Israel directly.

Arabs ruled the caliphate and most of the Muslim heartlands from the very beginning until 1517. So you are wrong with about 750 years.

Besides the Umayyads were the largest and most influential Caliphate and Muslim rulers in history. They conquered most of the non-Muslim lands as well from Spain/Portugal/France in the West to China (Western China) in the East. It was one of the largest empires in recorded history and the largest from West Asia in recorded history. They also built the Al-Aqsa mosque and the Dome of the Rock that are still standing in all their glory in Al-Quds almost 1350/1300 years after. Their legacy is the Arab world (the size of Russia) spanning 2 continents and all its heritage during that time period. Their importance cannot be underestimated.

Turks were not relevant in the Arab world until 1517? Then you dont count the Abbasids as Arabs? One of Harun Al Rashid’s wife was from Turkish origin. She gave birth to another caliph, Al-Mu’tasem. He and his halfbrother Al-Ma’mun were famous because they used Turkish guards and slaves to counter internal enemies and rivals and rebels and the Byzantians. So go read some history first.

You talked about sacrifices against the West and that Arabs did the most.

We doubt that and came with facts and numbers. You are coming with theories and jews and this and that.

Look at the Crusades and wich groups and beyliks fought them. Count the number of battles against Europe from the Battle of Malazgirt in 1071 till the First World War in 1914.

Count the battles of the Ottomans alone against the European kingdoms alone, and you will see they alone fought more than all Arabs combined.

Mamluks were a Turkish dynasty ruling over Egypt, they were Turkish Kipchak slaves and Circassians ans East-European slaves, but the majority were Turkish slaves, because Turkish guards and slaves were famous in the Arab world thanks to Caliph Al-Ma’mun and Al-Mu’tasim who used and hired him. The greatest Mamluk sultans were Turks (Baybars and Qutuz).

After the Ummayads, there was no central Arab power that controlled the muslim heartlands, but that was not the point here. Statisticly the Turks fought more against the West.

But that doesnt count now. Where are the Turks and Arabs and Persians now?
 
Turks were not relevant in the Arab world until 1517? Then you dont count the Abbasids as Arabs? One of Harun Al Rashid’s wife was from Turkish origin. She gave birth to another caliph, Al-Mu’tasem. He and his halfbrother Al-Ma’mun were famous because they used Turkish guards and slaves to counter internal enemies and rivals and rebels and the Byzantians. So go read some history first.

You talked about sacrifices against the West and that Arabs did the most.

We doubt that and came with facts and numbers. You are coming with theories and jews and this and that.

Look at the Crusades and wich groups and beyliks fought them. Count the number of battles against Europe from the Battle of Malazgirt in 1071 till the First World War in 1914.

Count the battles of the Ottomans alone against the European kingdoms alone, and you will see they alone fought more than all Arabs combined.

Mamluks were a Turkish dynasty ruling over Egypt, they were Turkish Kipchak slaves and Circassians ans East-European slaves, but the majority were Turkish slaves, because Turkish guards and slaves were famous in the Arab world thanks to Caliph Al-Ma’mun and Al-Mu’tasim who used and hired him. The greatest Mamluk sultans were Turks (Baybars and Qutuz).

After the Ummayads, there was no central Arab power that controlled the muslim heartlands, but that was not the point here. Statisticly the Turks fought more against the West.

But that doesnt count now. Where are the Turks and Arabs and Persians now?
The Abbasids was an Arab and Hejazi dynasty. What have they to do with Turks or any other foreigners? It was very common for rulers to intermarry with foreigners to secure alliances. Look at the mothers of most Ottoman Sultans. Most of them were non-Turks. Often Slavic or Circassian women. Does that make the Ottoman dynasty non-Turkic?

There is nothing to doubt. Arabs have done the most fighting against the West and Jews. History confirms this as does the events since 1948. If you notice I included Turks earlier as the only other relevant Muslims in this regard. But this is also due to geography, can't expect Indonesian Muslims to fight against the West from 10.000 km away.

The Crusades were fought on Arab Muslim land with mostly Arab Muslim foot soldiers. Along with Turkic allies who were brought to the region by Arabs. And were completely Arabized. To deny this is to deny reality.

Not really. The Arabs conquered much more European territory than the Ottomans who only controlled tiny Greece, Balkans and Cyprus. The Arabs ruled Al-Andalus (Spain and Portugal) which is bigger alone, for 800 years. Including Sicily, Southern Italy, Malta, parts of France, Crete, Cyprus, parts of Greece and prior to the Ottomans, 700 + years o wars against the Byzantine Empire (which weakened it along with the Seljuks).

Not to mention half of Anatolia (modern-day Turkey) which prior to the Arab Muslims was controlled by Christians and Greeks (Byzantines). Which is also why the Arab Turkish community (native) predates the Turkic migrations to Anatolia.


In fact Arabs have an almost 2500 year old presence in what is today Turkey.


But the Mamluks were completely Arabized and bought to the region by Arabs as slaves. For over half of the Mamluk rule it was Circassian rule. But Mamluks came almost 700 years after the first Arab Muslim rule of Egypt and prior after the Fatimids (the strongest rulers based in Egypt).

Not true, Abbasid rule ended in Cairo in 1517. Until 1258 (500 + years) the Abbasids were overall the strongest Muslim power and the Caliphate.

Turkic presence (large one), as I wrote, occurred after 1517 but even after 1517 half of the Arab world was not/never under Ottoman rule and most of the parts that were, were ruled by local Arab rulers allied with the Sultan. In particular in the Maghreb and Arabia. For instance the Sharifs of Makkah and Madinah had been in power 400 years prior to the Ottoman appearance in 1517 and they continued to rule Makkah and Madinah until 1920. Ottoman presence in Arabia was limited to a few military garrisons. The main focus of the Ottomans was in the Balkans and Anatolia.

And who but Arabs have been fighting against Israel since 1948 as well?
 
Last edited:
The Abbasids was an Arab and Hejazi dynasty. What have they to do with Turks or any other foreigners? It was very common for rulers to intermarry with foreigners to secure alliances. Look at the mothers of most Ottoman Sultans. Most of them were non-Turks. Often Slavic or Circassian women. Does that make the Ottoman dynasty non-Turkic?

There is nothing to doubt. Arabs have done the most fighting against the West and Jews. History confirms this as does the events since 1948. If you notice I included Turks earlier as the only other relevant Muslims in this regard. But this is also due to geography, can't expect Indonesian Muslims to fight against the West from 10.000 km away.

The Crusades were fought on Arab Muslim land with mostly Arab Muslim foot soldiers. Along with Turkic allies who were brought to the region by Arabs. And were completely Arabized. To deny this is to deny reality.

Not really. The Arabs conquered much more European territory than the Ottomans who only controlled tiny Greece, Balkans and Cyprus. The Arabs ruled Al-Andalus (Spain and Portugal) which is bigger alone, for 800 years. Including Sicily, Southern Italy, Malta, parts of France, Crete, Cyprus, parts of Greece and prior to the Ottomans, 700 + years o wars against the Byzantine Empire (which weakened it along with the Seljuks).

But the Mamluks were completely Arabized and bought to the region by Arabs as slaves. For over half of the Mamluk rule it was Circassian rule. But Mamluks came almost 700 years after the first Arab Muslim rule of Egypt and prior after the Fatimids (the strongest rulers based in Egypt).

Not true, Abbasid rule ended in Cairo in 1517. Until 1258 (500 + years) the Abbasids were overall the strongest Muslim power and the Caliphate.

Turkic presence (large one), as I wrote, occurred after 1517 but even after 1517 half of the Arab world was not/never under Ottoman rule and most of the parts that were, were ruled by local Arab rulers allied with the Sultan. In particular in the Maghreb and Arabia. For instance the Sharifs of Makkah and Madinah had been in power 400 years prior to the Ottoman appearance in 1517.

And who but Arabs have been fighting against Israel since 1948 as well?

Jesus Chrisht.

So much facts wrong, so much nonsense. You are just writing to write and trolling; for example where did i say that Abbasids were a Turkish dynasty? Have you houmous in your eyes or is your English really so bad?

Its Ramadan and i dont have the energy to debunk so much nonsense.

If you think that Arabs fought more battles against the West, lets count the battles. Put here all the battles from Arabs against the West and i will response with all the battles from the Turks.. The facts are with me. You dont even know which European nations the Ottomans controll.

Go read some history first, seriously i dont wanns do this.
 
I don't know why people here are resorting to history. No use. When this conflict started in October 2023, some brought up the so-called 'Arab' betrayal of the Ottoman Empire a century ago to justify the current Turkish inaction in the conflict, to which @Unknowntruth gave a very good response: The Ottomans were going to fall anyway.

So talk about the current situation, please!

But it is the stupidity of the general public and the lack of political understanding of the various players involved in the current conflict which grates me the most! With all the info at their finger tips, we have the stupid Trump Selfies Imams, the stupid people who couldn't differentiate between Biden and his more pro Palestinian political base, the stupid Pakistanis rooting for Trump because he would, presumably, free their beloved stupid Imran Khan, the stupid 'Latinos for Trump' who are crying now when their kins are being deported, the stupid 'African Americans for Trump' who are losing the privileges of DEI, the stupid Europeans who are still stuck in the Cold War era when the American Neo Cons keep destroying their region, thus sending waves of refugees to Europe and increasing their energy costs...

Most people can't see beyond their nose!
 
Jesus Chrisht.

So much facts wrong, so much nonsense. You are just writing to write and trolling; for example where did i say that Abbasids were a Turkish dynasty? Have you houmous in your eyes or is your English really so bad?

Its Ramadan and i dont have the energy to debunk so much nonsense.

If you think that Arabs fought more battles against the West, lets count the battles. Put here all the battles from Arabs against the West and i will response with all the battles from the Turks.. The facts are with me. You dont even know which European nations the Ottomans controll.

Go read some history first, seriously i dont wanns do this.
But your writing is not nonsense? Yes, Arabs did not conquer half of Europe (most of Southern Europe) and ruled it for almost 800 years (in the case of Al-Andalus). The Ottoman were only present in Cyprus, Greece and Balkans. With a short presence in tiny Hungary and barren steps of Ukraine (mostly Crimean Tatars/Khanate). How is that wrong?

Arabs thought against the Byzantine Empire for almost 500 years in a row (on and off) which heavily weakened the Byzantine Empire and made them lose more than 50% of their territory.


There were literally 1000's of battles on this front alone. Let alone in Al-Andalus against the most powerful European powers of the time. Since the battles with the Frankish empire (most powerful European kingdom at the time) 10.000 km from the Arab heartlands.

When the Ottomans appeared in history in 1299, the Byzantime Empire was heavily weakened and only controlled a small part of Anatolia and parts of Balkans. They were a shadow of themselves due to (among others) 800 + years of wars with Arabs and Muslims (later Turkics as well as I wrote).

Arabs have literally fought the US head on since WW2. Israelis as well since 1948. No other Muslims have done that. Let alone Turkey.

From the apperance of Islam (early 600's) until 1500's Arabs and the West fought constant wars. Even after 1517, Arabs and the West fought. The Barbary States, the Kingdom of Morocco, Yemeni Kingdoms, Omani Empire (even in Africa), various Saudi states during Ikhwan raids on Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait and elsewhere.

And once again, you were writing initial nonsense (which I corrected) and you still don't understand that I included Turks as the only ones that are even comparable to Arabs in this regard. Before you even commented on anything.

Anyway what fighting against the West has Turkey done since WW2? You became a NATO member state and have for decades tried to join the EU and become an accepted part of Europe (to no avail so far).

Ask the average Westerner or European who they consider as the bigger threat/enemy. Arabs or Turks. You think the entire Eurobia conspiracy theory (notice the name) just came out of the blue?

Anyway I honestly don't care, none of this is relevant in this thread and once again I only see Arabs fighting against Israel and the US since WW2 of any Muslims. Directly that is. Even the Iranian regime are only good at using Arabs (terrorist proxies) to make it even more funny.
 
I don't know why people here are resorting to history. No use. When this conflict started in October 2023, some brought up the so-called 'Arab' betrayal of the Ottoman Empire a century ago to justify the current Turkish inaction in the conflict, to which @Unknowntruth gave a very good response: The Ottomans were going to fall anyway.

So talk about the current situation, please!

But it is the stupidity of the general public and the lack of political understanding of the various players involved in the current conflict which grates me the most! With all the info at their finger tips, we have the stupid Trump Selfies Imams, the stupid people who couldn't differentiate between Biden and his more pro Palestinian political base, the stupid Pakistanis rooting for Trump because he would, presumably, free their beloved stupid Imran Khan, the stupid 'Latinos for Trump' who are crying now when their kins are being deported, the stupid 'African Americans for Trump' who are losing the privileges of DEI, the stupid Europeans who are still stuck in the Cold War era when the American Neo Cons keep destroying their region, thus sending waves of refugees to Europe and increasing their energy costs...

Most people can't see beyond their nose!

The U.S and west are barely concealed white supremacist states, they always were but the concept of law and international law kept them somewhat at bay

Israel is a Jew colonial colony backed by the U.S

These states are vile and instead of understanding this scum and taking measures to protect the middle east the Arabs especially cucked themselves and need to immediately take steps to push the U.S away and stand on their own feet

Everyone is realizing why the Jews went through the Holocaust and pogroms and expulsions, their future is a dark one because justice will catch up with them one of these days
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


So - basically they killed a whole bunch of civilian bureaucrats and administrators - right? Alongside hundreds of civilian women and children....
 
So - basically they killed a whole bunch of civilian bureaucrats and administrators - right? Alongside hundreds of civilian women and children....

The U.S and Israel have become contemptible states, the Zionist control of the U.S will destroy U.S standing, at the moment the world is desperate for a alternative to the Yankee clowns
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
So - basically they killed a whole bunch of civilian bureaucrats and administrators - right? Alongside hundreds of civilian women and children....
Absolutely, nobody military or actually a senior political official /member of Shura council. Ordinary civil employees that actually aren't affiliated with Hamas on a ideological level but simply apply for government available jobs in their profession.

Israel killed 174 children last night. In minutes. The counting of the dead is what took several hours.

It's a crime against humanity and deliberate mass murder going on.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top