Chinese 6th Generation Aircraft News & Discussions

are you expert in aerodynamic and aviation fields to say there no limitation of DSI to go beyond Mach 2, and do research before spewing nonsense, DSI equipped jet can't go beyond Mach 2, and there is no DSI intakes on J-36 has been so far and DSI intakes is not neccerrory for J-36
Lockheed DSI

Unless you can put a degree up neither him or you or me are experts so always use sources.

Per Lockheed they tested it to Mach 2 but that doesn’t mean it cannot. NASA took it beyond to 2.2 so your statement is blatantly false.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010049344
Refinements of the design keep the boundary layer air out and it could theoretically go to Mach 2.5 but at serious loss of efficiency.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
In 2018, an official Chinese organization released a video, “军人一分钟 (One Minute for Military Personnel)”. ------ At that time, the WS-15 was not yet equipped on the J-20.
In that video, it was clearly mentioned that “For one minute, the J-20 fighter jet can combat cruise 52KM.”
You can do your own conversions of how many Mach's this speed equals!
View attachment 108923
Official Video Link

The organization that produced and published the video is People's Daily. It is the highest authoritative media in China, with absolute official authority.
1742586702870.png
1742586822630.png
1742586843656.png
 
Definitely brother J20 can fly faster than F-35 but Mach 2.5 is extremely unlikely may be it has a top speed of slightly above Mach 2 but not Mach 2.5
you just kept going and going and we all knows why, now, mind if you could explain does canard comprised RCS, because NGAD does have canard.

I applaud J36 and J50's aerodynamic design.

1000005201.jpg
 
ofc ofc, it's a belief thing when it comes to US, but when it comes to J20, it compromised RCS.
that's not the point, USAF in 80s and 90s thinks that CANARDS did increase RCS but it proved wrong in X-plane research (X-36) anyway
 
If CANARDS is that necessary then Why they are implemented on CAC J-36 and J-50?
SAC should just borrowed the canard from CAC instead of a moveable wingtip, why such hassle, right?

"NAGA is the best" tells everything, whatever it is, it is always the best, you have prepared all the story, we knew we knew.
 
@NGAD IS THE BEST
so your sole purpose is to proved NGAD is the best just like your ID right, in regards of everything, include its aero dynamic design.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top