Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

Usa/Israel will blackmail Lebanese army to take action against Hizbollah, if they do it will lead to internal clashes and if they refuse Israel will bomb Lebanon and also HTS and allies will target from Syria. Israel will want Hizbollah finished just like Bashar Al Assad and SAA.
That's partly what I mean. Hezbollah leadership is well aware of that the people of southern Lebanon, mostly Shia, and all it's supporters are doomed for destruction if it's hands in its weapons. There will no mercy. Syria being the latest prime example. I'm certain that they'll choose civil war, and all out war with the zionist West. A hope of victory is far better certain defeat. The line has to drawn somewhere and this would certainly be an absolute red line.
It seems many of you forget, or are unaware, how this all started. Hezbollah was once 8 guys receiving assistance and training from Iran. Lebanon was occupied and in the midst of civil war that makes Syria look like a picnic.
Some here are spreading fear and nonsense about premature demise of the AoR. Do not waste your time on them. Have faith and patiently persevere these temporary hardships.
Always remember the 8!
 
Iran took a gamble on wrong syrian card and lost. If they were not impatient and let assad regime to go in dustbin of history at 2011 they could cook some more favorable conditions and preserve overall strategy, best what Iran can do is to let Arabs st least ten years from now to figure out their own shit together and then maybe come back with coherent strategy and reliable partners of there would be any,
not really palatable to sit and watch jihadists slaughter shias and hope they will be the only jihadists who don't hate iran more than they hate Israel
 
not really palatable to sit and watch jihadists slaughter shias and hope they will be the only jihadists who don't hate iran more than they hate Israel
Ok, do your thing as you wish, at the end of the day more sunnis got killed and harmed in middle east due iranian interventions.
Overall defeat of iranian strategy would need at least decade to regine any influence in land around occupied palestine.
And it is really funny to adopt western terminology that being jihadist is something bad per se.
 
we are proud to have killed many ISIS terrorists, their sect is your problem
You can sell that story to someone else, i know very well who you killed in syria and against isis you could not do shit without intensive american air support, they literally kicked ass of everybody untill americans stepped in.
Anyway that is history, now what remained for Iran to handle is Hezbolah and Yemen, both with extreme difficulties and operational limitations. Unless you quickly do not make deal with Jolani Hezbolah will be defeated decisevely by jews, Yemen has better prospects due self sustain activities where even limited iranian help matters a lot.
 
That's partly what I mean. Hezbollah leadership is well aware of that the people of southern Lebanon, mostly Shia, and all it's supporters are doomed for destruction if it's hands in its weapons. There will no mercy. Syria being the latest prime example. I'm certain that they'll choose civil war, and all out war with the zionist West. A hope of victory is far better certain defeat. The line has to drawn somewhere and this would certainly be an absolute red line.
It seems many of you forget, or are unaware, how this all started. Hezbollah was once 8 guys receiving assistance and training from Iran. Lebanon was occupied and in the midst of civil war that makes Syria look like a picnic.
Some here are spreading fear and nonsense about premature demise of the AoR. Do not waste your time on them. Have faith and patiently persevere these temporary hardships.
Always remember the 8!
I think for a lot of people the issue was how disastrously Hezbollah was defeated this time around and with such ease. There's no excuse Nasrallah or Iranian leadership had for the situation that Israel was able to thoroughly compromise that group, render their communications void, and be able to take out most of their munitions. Hezbollah stood their ground in some areas, but was routed in other areas. Israel still occupies South Lebanon and with Syria gone, Israel and its Sunni allies to the north are going to go in for the kill. There's no excuse after this much investment for such an absolute blunder. Pager attacks and other forms of skullduggery should be expected, these are Israelis, ghouls in human form with no scruples whatsoever but the survival of their "Chosen" tribe. They also are the brains behind almost all US and EU surveillance tech, internet and electronic warfare.
 
I think for a lot of people the issue was how disastrously Hezbollah was defeated this time around and with such ease. There's no excuse Nasrallah or Iranian leadership had for the situation that Israel was able to thoroughly compromise that group, render their communications void, and be able to take out most of their munitions. Hezbollah stood their ground in some areas, but was routed in other areas. Israel still occupies South Lebanon and with Syria gone, Israel and its Sunni allies to the north are going to go in for the kill. There's no excuse after this much investment for such an absolute blunder. Pager attacks and other forms of skullduggery should be expected, these are Israelis, ghouls in human form with no scruples whatsoever but the survival of their "Chosen" tribe. They also are the brains behind almost all US and EU surveillance tech, internet and electronic warfare.
They're actually not the brains of anything but Hollywood made up stories of the mighty zionist illuminati. Most of the tech in the US are actually the work of Chinese, Indians, Iranians and other foreigners. The occupying entity plays a insignificant part.
Hezbollah has suffered a setback, Iran's influence in Syria has taken a hit and the Palestinian factions are in severe difficulties. This is the nature of struggle in which we who believe find ourselves.
Things have been way more complicated in the past, and will most likely be even more so in the future. This doesn't give us any reason for despair because we're certain of the final outcome.
 
They're actually not the brains of anything but Hollywood made up stories of the mighty zionist illuminati. Most of the tech in the US are actually the work of Chinese, Indians, Iranians and other foreigners. The occupying entity plays a insignificant part.
Hezbollah has suffered a setback, Iran's influence in Syria has taken a hit and the Palestinian factions are in severe difficulties. This is the nature of struggle in which we who believe find ourselves.
Things have been way more complicated in the past, and will most likely be even more so in the future. This doesn't give us any reason for despair because we're certain of the final outcome.
These are the actual programmers and specialists, yes. But Jews dominate the managerial class and entrepreneur class in tech industries.

I'm of the belief that the nature of the struggle you speak of didn't have to be this way. Iran missed a lot of opportunities. Israel had time to recover. Had Iran gone all in and overwhelmed Israel, while simultaneously building 10-20 nukes and continuing production to now, it would have been a settled deal. You never give your enemy a break. War is a jungle. War is human animal nature in its purest form, the strong and quick survive. And for the record, taking a hit in Syria is putting it lightly. Iran completely lost Syria. There will never be that same level of Iranian influence in Syria again.
 
These are the actual programmers and specialists, yes. But Jews dominate the managerial class and entrepreneur class in tech industries.
My answer was related to this sentence in your reply "They also are the brains behind almost all US and EU surveillance tech, internet and electronic warfare."
I'm of the belief that the nature of the struggle you speak of didn't have to be this way. Iran missed a lot of opportunities.
I not a fan of so called missed opportunities. One does what one can at any given moment. Considering the situation and the enemy involved I believe Iran has done great things but to each his own.
Israel had time to recover. Had Iran gone all in and overwhelmed Israel, while simultaneously building 10-20 nukes and continuing production to now, it would have been a settled deal. You never give your enemy a break.
Iran calculated the pros and cons of the situation and decided accordingly. I for one have faith the Iran's decision makers. Nuclear weapons have no place in Iran's military doctrine per decision of the SL and I respect this moral standpoint because it's based on the Deen I follow. Should the situation necessitate then I believe a different ruling will be reached. We're moral religious being but we're not suicidal. Fighting is prescribed upon us.
War is a jungle. War is human animal nature in its purest form, the strong and quick survive. And for the record, taking a hit in Syria is putting it lightly. Iran completely lost Syria. There will never be that same level of Iranian influence in Syria again.
I disagree with you. War for us who follow Deen of Islam is absolutely not a jungle. War has very well defined laws and rules. We have never acted like immoral zionist West and I pray that no Iranian leader will ever degenerate to such levels.
Syria looks all but lost to Iranian legitimate interest at the moment but I for one am certain that this is temporary. As I have continuously stated, Iran has legitimate interest in Syria and that doesn't disappear just because Assad rule is finished. This will soon start to manifest itself.
 
My answer was related to this sentence in your reply "They also are the brains behind almost all US and EU surveillance tech, internet and electronic warfare."

I not a fan of so called missed opportunities. One does what one can at any given moment. Considering the situation and the enemy involved I believe Iran has done great things but to each his own.

Iran calculated the pros and cons of the situation and decided accordingly. I for one have faith the Iran's decision makers. Nuclear weapons have no place in Iran's military doctrine per decision of the SL and I respect this moral standpoint because it's based on the Deen I follow. Should the situation necessitate then I believe a different ruling will be reached. We're moral religious being but we're not suicidal. Fighting is prescribed upon us.

I disagree with you. War for us who follow Deen of Islam is absolutely not a jungle. War has very well defined laws and rules. We have never acted like immoral zionist West and I pray that no Iranian leader will ever degenerate to such levels.
Syria looks all but lost to Iranian legitimate interest at the moment but I for one am certain that this is temporary. As I have continuously stated, Iran has legitimate interest in Syria and that doesn't disappear just because Assad rule is finished. This will soon start to manifest itself.

War is the Darwinian struggle for existence, it knows no scruples- only whatever it takes to live for another day. This is why Khamenei's views on this matter are retarded and ultimately why the Islamic Republic cannot protect the people of Iran, the pillar of any government's legitimacy.

Nobody follows moral rules in war. Not a single war was won by playing nice. RoE is PR, and that's it.
 
War is the Darwinian struggle for existence, it knows no scruples- only whatever it takes to live for another day. This is why Khamenei's views on this matter are retarded and ultimately why the Islamic Republic cannot protect the people of Iran, the pillar of any government's legitimacy.
We see things differently concerning this. You choose to believe in Darwin ism and I in Deen. Two different D's.
His views are not retarded. They're based on concepts on which you apparently do not understand and henceforth it's cannot have patience with which you understand not.
If there's any country that has been able to protect its territory and people since 1979 then it is Iran. This not a matter of subjective interpretation.
Nobody follows moral rules in war. Not a single war was won by playing nice. RoE is PR, and that's it.
You're historically wrong but I can understand you seeing things from that perspective if your subject matter is western states. As I have stated. As a Muslim I believe in the rules of war defined by what has been prescribed for us. Your entitled to choose your own set of believes as you see fit.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

The SL has answered in a language so simple and plain that even their zionist POTUS can understand. I for one do not believe that the Americans are mad enough to through a war scenario with Iran, but if they are then war it is. Iran does not want war. No sane person wishes for war because of the consequences on the civilian population but Iran will not shy away from war. I pray to be alive should such madness unfold. The American military brass is not suicidal. Don Trump of the House of Orange is all talk.
 
The SL has answered in a language so simple and plain that even their zionist POTUS can understand. I for one do not believe that the Americans are mad enough to through a war scenario with Iran, but if they are then war it is. Iran does not want war. No sane person wishes for war because of the consequences on the civilian population but Iran will not shy away from war. I pray to be alive should such madness unfold. The American military brass is not suicidal. Don Trump of the House of Orange is all talk.
Iran needs to be ready, and I'm not referring to offensive capabilities. A significant achievement for Iran would be successfully defending against an attack in a manner that renders military actions against the country ineffective and unsustainable. There's no need for a strong retaliation. Iran possesses certain strategic advantages that, if leveraged wisely, could alter the trajectory of this conflict.

The question is: How reliable is Iran's defense?
 
Iran needs to be ready, and I'm not referring to offensive capabilities. A significant achievement for Iran would be successfully defending against an attack in a manner that renders military actions against the country ineffective and unsustainable. There's no need for a strong retaliation. Iran possesses certain strategic advantages that, if leveraged wisely, could alter the trajectory of this conflict.

The question is: How reliable is Iran's defense?
Iran is ready and has been ready to fight the zionist West to a standstill for a least the last 30 years. Hence it's still not subject for destruction.
Please elaborate if you're thinking of something specific.
In my opinion what I believe you're alluding to is exactly what Iran has already achieved. The zionist West, particularly the US, has always understood that any overt military action Iran would be, in your own words, "ineffective and unsustainable" henceforth military action akin to the one taken against Iraq an absolute no go. And this even without taking into account the devastating consequences on their part of such action.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top