Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

[Persian Gulf]

Really some guys can't make up your mind. You keep moving the goalpost. You laughed at us who stated that Iran probably has more than a 100 000 missiles and called us all sort of names. Now that we've had our proof is in the pudding moment you're all scurrying the belittle the amount of missiles by underestimating their value.
This is truly disingenuous och totally lacks coherence. I do admire the ability to perform mental gymnastics by some here. You may say what you want about us diehards for the IRI here but at least we're faithful and consequent with our heads in the sky predictions.

both can be true

1) Iran does not have 100,000 MRBMs

2) MRBMs alone with current level of accuracy and destructive power are not sufficient to deter or defeat a conventionally superior nuclear adversary devoid of any war ethics

 

[Mehdipersian]

TP3

پیام شهر موشکی سپاه؛ آمادگی 10 برابر وعده صادق - تسنیم

سپاه در رونمایی از شهر موشکی جدید خود، انبوهی از موشک‌های بالستیک «خیبرشکن»، «حاج قاسم»، «عماد»، «سجیل» «قدر H» و «کروز پاوه» را به نمایش در آورد.

www.tasnimnews.com

 

[Sakuee]

Iran had F14, F5, F4, state of the art, incl. F16 airframe and thinking about F18.

Now Iran has handful of russian garbage and stockpile of worthless rockets

Chi boodim, chi shodim

 

[muhammed45]

Billions of USD worth trade is going on through red sea as we speak and you are delusional if you think American Ships "were seriously damaged in that region"? I welcome evidence otherwise.



None of these words could save the lives of boys that were burnt by US/NATO/Israeli PGMs.

Houthis can not even dream of developing an IADS like Iran and we know Iranian IADS had no answer to ALBMs lobbed at its own passive assets. Forget Iranian IADS, Israeli AD could not stop missiles. Stop over-exaggerating AD. If US/NATO/Israel wants to finish Houthi military capability, they will do so without much trouble.



What blows? Did Houthis firing missiles or drones at Israel or kidnapping few stupid ass merchant ships deter Israel? US? NATO? no that did not happen. 60K Palestinians were butchered, Hezbollah has lost its leaders and Houthis themselves got bombed in their capital. Is that called delivering "serious blows" ?



Having means to build =/= having them. In last 5 years 3 nuclear armed to teeth countries have attacked Iran and Iran refused to respond or escalate. Can you think of a reason why?



Grow up .

Yeah, obviously USA has sent a massive force to red sea for fun and Yemenis failed to close that strait to western/Israeli ships.

Why don't you understand that there is a reason behind that massive build up in red sea?

Western propaganda has blinded you my friend. You fail to see the reason behind anger of Americans.

When an American high ranking general says that Ansarallah is scary, it gives me a clue. When they send reinforcement to repel attacks of Yemenis, it gives me a clue.

Many American military commanders have confessed to Yemeni might. You are the one blind to the truth.

 

[Tijani]

Iran had F14, F5, F4, state of the art, incl. F16 airframe and thinking about F18.

Now Iran has handful of russian garbage and stockpile of worthless rockets

Chi boodim, chi shodim

Come on dude. At least do some qualitative trolling if you're going engage yourself in the art of trolling. You're no fun. Come back when you start respecting your trade!

 

[Tijani]

both can be true

1) Iran does not have 100,000 MRBMs

2) MRBMs alone with current level of accuracy and destructive power are not sufficient to deter or defeat a conventionally superior nuclear adversary devoid of any war ethics

How anyone can doubt the destructive power of Iranian missiles is beyond me. TP 1 and 2 were measured responses as was the zionist regimes response.
No actor in their right mind is going to go full monty here. Not even the genocidal occupying entity and they consider Iran an essential threat.
In this case both are not true. Iran most like has a substantial number more than a 100 000 missiles with a destructive power reserved for an all out confrontation against the aliens and their cohorts.
Deterrence has long been established. It is illogical to believe otherwise. If the powers that be were be able to decimate Iran then this would've been done a long time ago.
Deterrence is the safeguards a nation from total defeat. It does not mean that the enemy won't inflict pain and damage on you to a certain level. Henceforth escalation gentlemen.

 

[Persian Gulf]

How anyone can doubt the destructive power of Iranian missiles is beyond me.

 

[Tijani]

You people have Islamists and Nazis on your server, you say to me troll?

You'll find every kind of soul roaming around here. As long as you keep it civil and respectful then you're be treated as such. But you start by trolling, which you did my friend, then you'll be notified concerning it. It's nothing personal. You're welcome to share your perspective and provide information to underpin your arguments but do it in a constructive manner. Your previous post was nothing of the sort. This is obviously only a recommendation from my part. But there are enforces among us "Islamist and Nazis" who won't be giving you "recommendations". I hope you understand.

 

[Tijani]

View attachment 109941

As I stated. We're share different views of the purpose of True Promise 1 and 2 and henceforth we reach different conclusions on the destructive power of Iran's missile inventory and obviously damage shown is not necessarily damage inflicted. The zionist are the definition of liars.

But for the sake of argument let us please assume the sources you're provided a factual. I've already stated in my previous argumentation why Iran would not and is not going to be aiming for wholesale destruction of the enemy's facilities and neither is the heinous adversary despite it's satanic beliefs.

I repeat. Henceforth escalatory steps until some actor makes a miscalculation.

 

[Persian Gulf]

As I stated. We're share different views of the purpose of True Promise 1 and 2 and henceforth we reach different conclusions on the destructive power of Iran's missile inventory and obviously damage shown is not necessarily damage inflicted. The zionist are the definition of liars.

But for the sake of argument let us please assume the sources you're provided a factual. I've already stated in my previous argumentation why Iran would not and is not going to be aiming for wholesale destruction of the enemy's facilities and neither is the heinous adversary despite it's satanic beliefs.

I repeat. Henceforth escalatory steps until some actor makes a miscalculation.

Zionists lie, Americans lie, Iranians lie, but satellite imagery does not lie

the above image shows a direct hit on the concrete F-35 shelter in the north of Nevatim base with insignificant level of damage

the satellite imagery also shows relatively small (c. 7-8m) impact craters on the runways

400-500kg warheads on that soil type do not produce much destruction

I present images and proof for all my claims and inferences. I welcome you to do the same

 

[Shags101]

Zionists lie, Americans lie, Iranians lie, but satellite imagery does not lie

the above image shows a direct hit on the concrete F-35 shelter in the north of Nevatim base with insignificant level of damage

the satellite imagery also shows relatively small (c. 7-8m) impact craters on the runways

400-500kg warheads on that soil type do not produce much destruction

I present images and proof for all my claims and inferences. I welcome you to do the same

You know you have said that about insignificant damage was done but the missile did penetrate the bunker regardless damage outside the damage sustained inside would’ve been tremendous……but unless photos leak out of what may have damaged no one will know for awhile

 

[Khorasan Black Flags]

Zionists lie, Americans lie, Iranians lie, but satellite imagery does not lie

the above image shows a direct hit on the concrete F-35 shelter in the north of Nevatim base with insignificant level of damage

the satellite imagery also shows relatively small (c. 7-8m) impact craters on the runways

400-500kg warheads on that soil type do not produce much destruction

I present images and proof for all my claims and inferences. I welcome you to do the same

When it comes to israel they will even change satellite images

First they censor with digital clouds for weeks and then they show fake satellite images(its very easy to make up things with AI)

If American companies don't do that, they will be fired by the evangelists and zionist lovers ruling america

Even if an american president like John F Kennedy oppose with zionists he will be killed

 

[Persian Gulf]

You know you have said that about insignificant damage was done but the missile did penetrate the bunker regardless damage outside the damage sustained inside would’ve been tremendous……but unless photos leak out of what may have damaged no one will know for awhile

from the size of the impact on top of the shelter it is clear the missile did not penetrate. more plausible explanation is that the warhead malfunctioned and failed to detonate at all



this is the best impact 180 missiles achieved. these are non-concrete shelters, a 500kg warhead impacting at mach 4-8 should do more damage than this

 

[Persian Gulf]

in this image we see 3 impacts, one direct hit on the AWACS shelters doing considerable damage, and 2 impacts that miss the shelters by 40-80 meters

 

[Garcia Sea]

The lifeline of Iran's security was Hezbollah.
Even Israel cannot intercept a large number of rockets fired from the proximity of southern Lebanon, and therefore war is not possible.
This premise collapsed with Hezbollah's de facto surrender.
High-cost and easily intercepted MRBMs cannot fight Israel or the United States.
Iran should change its strategy and adopt a retaliatory system of saturation attacks on desalination plants, power plants, and oil fields in Qatar and the UAE with SRBMs with short ranges in case of emergency. This is the same logic that North Korea has used to prevent the U.S. military from advancing northward by sticking its firebombs in Seoul.