Breaking News: US Delivers First F-16V Fighter Jet to Taiwan to Boost Air Defense Against China Threats

"De facto" and "de jure" are terms used to describe the distinction between what exists in reality and what is officially recognized by law.

"De facto" refers to practices that exist in reality, regardless of whether they are officially recognized by laws or other formal norms. For example, a de facto government holds power without legal recognition.

On the other hand, "de jure" describes situations that are officially recognized by laws or other formal norms, regardless of whether these practices exist in reality. A de jure government is legally recognized and can get membership in the United Nations when most of the people or the majority of the states have recognized it.

The terms are often used in discussions about governance, authority, and leadership to highlight the difference between what exists in practice and what is officially sanctioned by law.
But we were talking about international recognition, not de facto issue, CCP was a de facto government before 1949 in China, but never got global recognition.

Do you know how many " de factor" governments now in Myanmar?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
But we were talking about international recognition, not de facto issue, CCP was a de facto government before 1949 in China, but never got global recognition.

Do you know how many " de factor" governments now in Myanmar?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


 
You read the previous posts again, we were talking about international community recognition, many countries has de facto local governments within their countries including India, but they never got international community recognition.

I hope you recognize the irony of your comment when this entire thread is about "

US Delivers First F-16V Fighter Jet to Taiwan to Boost Air Defense Against China "​


You can argue and debate till the cows come home.

Or you can live in reality and watch Taiwan fly the F-16's.
 
I hope you recognize the irony of your comment when this entire thread is about "

US Delivers First F-16V Fighter Jet to Taiwan to Boost Air Defense Against China "​


You can argue and debate till the cows come home.

Or you can live in reality and watch Taiwan fly the F-16's.
Did you read all posts leading to this debate? He specifically answer me why I think he is liar after calling me a troll when I tries to comment on this thread, what do you expect me to say other than answering his direct question?
 
That's official recognition, why US stopped paying this "lip service" to Taiwan in 1979? You were caught lying that "most countries" recognize Taiwan as a country, it's a lie, everyone can see you are lying.

Taiwan public protest in 1979
carters-presence-in-plains-attracts-taiwanese-protest-december-24-1978-the-nationalist-chinese-were-unleashed-on-plains-today-plains-georgia-about-400-chanting-banner-carrying-taiwanese-americans-marched-to-the-center-of-president-jimmy-carters-hometown-in-protest-of-american-diplomatic-recognition-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china-while-the-president-was-at-his-home-four-blocks-away-ken-hawkins-photo-2JKMM0E.jpg
Hahaha then tell me why they selling latest weapons to Taiwan and why USN sailing through Taiwan Strait and South China Sea time to time if they're supporting One China policy? Dude you're dishonest and troll not me
 
Hahaha then tell me why they selling latest weapons to Taiwan and why USN sailing through Taiwan Strait and South China Sea time to time if they're supporting One China policy? Dude you're dishonest and troll not me
I m dishonest? are you for real, how can you be this dishonest? US sells weapons to everyone, countries and regions, governments and rebels, is this news to you? how many times that US helped rebels in the past, you really have no idea? the most recent one is Syria, you are just helplessly dishonest.
 
These F-16's will be able to link to US networks giving them the ability to access ISR and giving them greater situational awareness. They will be able to launch their aim-120c7's/c8's using US aircraft and ships targeting sensors.

Same way Ukraine manages to have their small air force. Same way no Israeli fighter was damaged when Iran launched 400+ missiles. Taiwan will disperse their fighters using roads for runways.

Any Taiwan China conflict is going to have at least 2 weeks notice and that is a conservative estimate. Once chairman Xi makes the decision to attack there's going to be a HUGE electronic chatter and mobilization because CCP knows, unlike Ukraine, Taiwan has the ability to hit back. There will be at least 8-12 airbases that will be used to strike Taiwan all in range of Taiwan missiles.
View attachment 111233
View attachment 111234

It also means all naval ports are in range. PLAN will have to sail below the line of sight of Taiwans land base anti ship radars which will have high ground because of Taiwan's coastal elevation. Leader Xi knows a conflict with Taiwan in the short term is going to be very costly in equipment.

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

We will have to agree to disagree.

- all of Taiwan is in range of rocket artillery. These can be mobilised relatively quickly and Taiwan doesn't have sufficient land mass to constantly mobilise assets.

- naval blockade....Ukraine scenario is different due to a) greater land mass b) unprecedented support from Europe via land routes. Their A2A stocks will deplete quickly.
- recent images from nevetim indicate good damage following TP2. China won't limit its strikes, unlike Iran. No time to repair...
- You think USA will actively intervene? It did not for Ukraine...
- China is formulating bespoke strategies for Taiwan...the amphibious barges are a good example.
- yes, some Taiwanese missiles could hit China but so what.....a few bruises are expected for the inevitable victor.
 
I m dishonest? are you for real, how can you be this dishonest? US sells weapons to everyone, countries and regions, governments and rebels, is this news to you? how many times that US helped rebels in the past, you really have no idea? the most recent one is Syria, you are just helplessly dishonest.
You're the Chinese bot who always live in utopia and fantasy world, in reality USA don't care One China policy anymore there's reasons that USN sailing through Taiwan Strait time to time, to defend Taiwan in case of your possible aggression against Taiwan
 
Last edited:
What exactly is this statement based on...?

The F-16's are proven in combat & the latest ones with AESA are pretty deadly.

Are they 5th Gen? No.

But..., in its Class - which the latest ones would be 4.5 Gen, its certainly better than most.

I'd pick the Block 70 over the J-10C anyday, because the Viper is a proven beast in various Air-to-Air combats & Air-to-Ground too.

Like plenty of other jets, the F-16 has gone through various upgrades.

And perhaps you should read up on the Block 70. Do Not assume that the Rafale can easily take out the Viper.

The earlier F-16's may be 4th Gen, but the latest variant falls in the 4.5 Gen category.

F16S are similar to Mig29s who are worth flying but don't show price of selling as of in today's world 🙂
Taiwan already use Mirage2000 with having experience on these birds also.
It's impossible to understand why they paying for old F16s 🕳️
 
You're the Chinese bot who always live in utopia and fantasy world, in reality USA don't care One China policy anymore there's reasons that USN sailing through Taiwan Strait time to time, to defend Taiwan in case of your possible aggression against Taiwan
You are a bot and troll, forever living in your delusional world and believe what you think should be what "most countries" think, that's really a mental problem, making you become a hibitual liar.

Donald Trump’s pick for Beijing envoy affirms US commitment to one-China policy​

By ROBERT DELANEY
Saturday, 05 Apr 2025

3247902.webp


President Donald Trump’s nominee for ambassador to Beijing said on Thursday that the US leader’s strategy for China would involve “some pain” and claimed that allies must do more to counter the Asian country.

Speaking in a confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, David Perdue, a former Republican senator representing Georgia, also affirmed Washington’s commitment to a one-China policy.

“We’re going to continue to honour the one-China policy, as stated in the Taiwan Relations Act, also backed up by the three communiques and the six assurances,” Perdue said.

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

The Taiwan Relations Act was signed by then-president Jimmy Carter shortly after Washington switched official diplomatic relations from Taipei to Beijing in 1979, and obligates the US government to support Taiwan’s defence capabilities.

However, it does not specifically articulate a one-China policy, which is spelled out in the first of the communiques – agreements between the US and China that formalised the diplomatic switch.

Perdue’s reference to the “six assurances” relates to commitments that Washington made to Taipei in 1982 that it would disregard Beijing’s opposition to US arms sales to the island.

Most countries, including the US, do not recognise Taiwan as an independent state, but Washington opposes any attempt to take the island by force and remains committed to supplying it with weapons.

Asked several times about what Trump’s administration will do to reverse the migration of supply chains for critical minerals, pharmaceuticals, shipbuilding and other industries to China, Perdue said: “President Trump is all over that. The starting conversation [is] with trade. There are going to be many others.”

Trump said last month that Chinese President Xi Jinping would visit the US in the “not too distant future”, although that has not been confirmed in Beijing.

Later in the hearing, when queried again about supply chains, Perdue lauded Trump for “stepping up and trying to communicate a very difficult strategy that may not be as easy as everybody thinks it will be on the American people”.

“There will be some pain in executing what we have to do to stand up and defend our own freedom,” he added.

Although he did not explicitly link the “pain” to disruptions expected as a result of the tariffs announced by Trump a day earlier, Perdue was speaking as global markets swooned on expectations that the punitive levies would stoke inflation and curb growth.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 1,600 points on Thursday.

China was America’s second largest import source last year in terms of value, which was pegged at US$439 billion, according to US government data. That was just behind Mexico, which shipped goods worth a total of US$506 billion.

Trump hit China with a 34 per cent import tariff, on top of the 20 per cent punitive levies laid on since he returned to office in January. Along with Canada – America’s third largest import source – Mexico was spared in Trump’s worldwide tariff salvo.

Perdue was grilled by Jeanne Shaheen, the Senate committee’s senior Democrat, and other members of her party on Trump’s abrupt withdrawal of foreign aid in the form of a spending freeze for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

They asked repeatedly how to prevent China from strengthening its influence in the Global South, Eastern Europe and other regions in the absence of US support, to which Perdue stressed the need to work with “allies”, whom he expected to help in this regard.

“The parties that are not being discussed here are the other democratic countries in the world. Where’s the EU in this we’re talking about ... taxpayer money. How much is coming out of the UK, out of the EU and other democratic countries?” he said.

“We have to face the reality that this is a coalescing need that we have in the democratic, free world to stand up to these types of challenges.”

https://www.thestar.com.my/aseanplu...-commitment-to-one-china-policy#goog_rewarded
 
One China Policy Explained by Jimmy Carter in 1978

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You are a bot and troll, forever living in your delusional world and believe what you think should be what "most countries" think, that's really a mental problem, making you become a hibitual liar.

Donald Trump’s pick for Beijing envoy affirms US commitment to one-China policy​

By ROBERT DELANEY
Saturday, 05 Apr 2025

3247902.webp


President Donald Trump’s nominee for ambassador to Beijing said on Thursday that the US leader’s strategy for China would involve “some pain” and claimed that allies must do more to counter the Asian country.

Speaking in a confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, David Perdue, a former Republican senator representing Georgia, also affirmed Washington’s commitment to a one-China policy.

“We’re going to continue to honour the one-China policy, as stated in the Taiwan Relations Act, also backed up by the three communiques and the six assurances,” Perdue said.

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

The Taiwan Relations Act was signed by then-president Jimmy Carter shortly after Washington switched official diplomatic relations from Taipei to Beijing in 1979, and obligates the US government to support Taiwan’s defence capabilities.

However, it does not specifically articulate a one-China policy, which is spelled out in the first of the communiques – agreements between the US and China that formalised the diplomatic switch.

Perdue’s reference to the “six assurances” relates to commitments that Washington made to Taipei in 1982 that it would disregard Beijing’s opposition to US arms sales to the island.

Most countries, including the US, do not recognise Taiwan as an independent state, but Washington opposes any attempt to take the island by force and remains committed to supplying it with weapons.

Asked several times about what Trump’s administration will do to reverse the migration of supply chains for critical minerals, pharmaceuticals, shipbuilding and other industries to China, Perdue said: “President Trump is all over that. The starting conversation [is] with trade. There are going to be many others.”

Trump said last month that Chinese President Xi Jinping would visit the US in the “not too distant future”, although that has not been confirmed in Beijing.

Later in the hearing, when queried again about supply chains, Perdue lauded Trump for “stepping up and trying to communicate a very difficult strategy that may not be as easy as everybody thinks it will be on the American people”.

“There will be some pain in executing what we have to do to stand up and defend our own freedom,” he added.

Although he did not explicitly link the “pain” to disruptions expected as a result of the tariffs announced by Trump a day earlier, Perdue was speaking as global markets swooned on expectations that the punitive levies would stoke inflation and curb growth.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 1,600 points on Thursday.

China was America’s second largest import source last year in terms of value, which was pegged at US$439 billion, according to US government data. That was just behind Mexico, which shipped goods worth a total of US$506 billion.

Trump hit China with a 34 per cent import tariff, on top of the 20 per cent punitive levies laid on since he returned to office in January. Along with Canada – America’s third largest import source – Mexico was spared in Trump’s worldwide tariff salvo.

Perdue was grilled by Jeanne Shaheen, the Senate committee’s senior Democrat, and other members of her party on Trump’s abrupt withdrawal of foreign aid in the form of a spending freeze for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

They asked repeatedly how to prevent China from strengthening its influence in the Global South, Eastern Europe and other regions in the absence of US support, to which Perdue stressed the need to work with “allies”, whom he expected to help in this regard.

“The parties that are not being discussed here are the other democratic countries in the world. Where’s the EU in this we’re talking about ... taxpayer money. How much is coming out of the UK, out of the EU and other democratic countries?” he said.

“We have to face the reality that this is a coalescing need that we have in the democratic, free world to stand up to these types of challenges.”

https://www.thestar.com.my/aseanplu...-commitment-to-one-china-policy#goog_rewarded
You're really pathetic Chinese bot, I already said by saying they support but by act they are not lol
 
You're really pathetic Chinese bot, I already said by saying they support but by act they are not lol
No, you said " most countries" recognize Taiwan was a country, you didn't say support or not, otherwise there would be no argument cause I know many western countries secretly do support Taiwan, I won't lie shamelessly like you.
So people lie but will admit and correct their mistakes after being pointed out or debunked, people like you are habitual liars, will keep lying forever shameless even after being debunked, there's no sense of human honor, honesty and integrity in such beings.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top