Tank131
Registered Member
I see your point, question is though why arent they going that route. I hace my doubts about their ability to carry out such work independently, not from a technical perspective but rather a political perspective. I would imagine any nation threatening NATO hierarchy (ie US, UK, French weapons dominance) will be treated as a pariah in NATO (ala Turkey).Again, the issue is you're looking at CAMM-ER as ASRAAM. You're also looking quite narrowly at this.
The simple answer is, a CAMM-ER derived BVRAAM would be relatively easy to produce and add another VLRAAM option to the market.
They dont need to go back to ASRAAM. CAMM-ER in its current form, modified to be air launched would be perfectly sufficient. You're optimising flight profiles, also probably be able to shed some weight, etc etc. Nobody is providing asraam and nobody is saying this would be Pakistan specific. However, imagine a program that gave us some experience, working with a member of the 'A TEAM' of Euro missile design, allowing us to work with modern propellants and systems to locally produce a camm-er derived bvraam.
Imagine the doors also opened for italy. How many countries can offer a full avionics and missile package?
Russia(?)
US
Israel
China
France
Nobody else.
Italy however, has a lax ish arms export policy and CAN provide avionics, but is at the mercy of the US or MBDA to allow BVRAAM exports to compliment their avionics. Imagine an ITAR free, less restrictive but capable western missile and avionics suite. I can just imagine Egypt, tons of Gulf states and of course Pakistan frothing at the mouth...
As it stands, Turkey will likely fulfill the weapons role you envision here to some extent (at least Vis a vis short range - Gokdogan/goksur) route as a tri-service missile. Maybe FAAZ will fill that role also. But to the core of your argument about a lack of coordination, that is the plague of most countries (US included), until the civilians with pocket books step in and tell them what wasteful spending is being done. Sadly in Pakistan, no-one can say that to the military even through the combination of resources would likely yield a better overall product.




















