Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Prognostications said:
You are missing the Bigger point here

No country has Opposed India's plans for Any Retaliation

They know how long the problem has been persisting
Click to expand...
Why should they oppose it? They count that you are not complete idiots as much as you are trying to prove them wrong.
 
From ndtv...so not trolling here, bit serious point

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Prognostications said:
We don't have any other option

We need to do something to stop these attacks
Click to expand...

The problem also is that you Indian people think we can inflict damage without sustaining damage ourselves. You can not start a major war on corrupt Mod-is ramblings . As suggested by many let in outsiders from neutral nations to carry out a thorough independent investigation of this crime scene? There is no winner of a war of two countries with nukes.
 
Raj-Hindustani said:
Likewise - kargil war, Nawaz sharif flew america to stop india, later members ended claiming - india was begging to USA for help
Click to expand...

Nawaz Shareef is a pitho of india. He has business interests in India. So much is done but he hasn't said a word to india.

Nawaz shareef has parroted time and again the indian narrative. From Mumbai attacks to Kargil. He is so naive that he can't see all the terrorism that india has done against Pakistan over the years.

So what Nawaz did does not matter anymore.

No need for anyone to go anywhere this time

Most importantly, no one will be required to go to anywhere to stop war this time. Because earlier the notion was that Pakistan can fight limited war but won't sustain a long term war. That was true when armoured corps & infantry are facing superior number of armored thrust and larger man-power. But that dynamics has changed now. Now with serious advancements in stand off munition, missile program, GMLRs, Pakistan (and actually both countries) can do so much intense damage without even crossing borders. Plus drone warfare and lessons from Ukraine war tells us that even a small power can do long duration war with these new evolved battlefield scenarios that often involved low cost but effective solutions. That's all even without considering NASR tactical armament. Also at the time of Kargil, PAF was at significant drawback against IAF because IAF had aquired BVR technology but PAF fleet had not a single BVR missile. PAF first BVR capable platform was Jf-17 in 2008. Subsequently AMRAAMs were delivered in 2010 which outranged everything in IAF's arsenal. So this time Airforces are balanced and PAF even can dominate in various scenarios. According to indian Generals themselves, india was the strongest ever capability wise versus Pakistan during the kargil skirmish. That edge has gone now.
 
r3alist said:
From ndtv...so not trolling here, bit serious point

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Koi pochay tau bata dena, indians aye thay.
 
i have feeling that india will wait for a PAF aircraft to crash and declare victory over it…. 😅😅😅
 
Duffers go to Barracks! said:
Nawaz Shareef is a pitho of india. He has business interests in India. So much is done but he hasn't said a word to india.

Nawaz shareef has parroted time and again the indian narrative. From Mumbai attacks to Kargil. He is so naive that he can't see all the terrorism that india has done against Pakistan over the years.

So what Nawaz did does not matter anymore.

No need for anyone to go anywhere this time

Most importantly, no one will be required to go to anywhere to stop war this time. Because earlier the notion was that Pakistan can fight limited war but won't sustain a long term war. That was true when armoured corps & infantry are facing superior number of armored thrust and larger man-power. But that dynamics has changed now. Now with serious advancements in stand off munition, missile program, GMLRs, Pakistan (and actually both countries) can do so much intense damage without even crossing borders. Plus drone warfare and lessons from Ukraine war tells us that even a small power can do long duration war with these new evolved battlefield scenarios that often involved low cost but effective solutions. That's all even without considering NASR tactical armament. Also at the time of Kargil, PAF was at significant drawback against IAF because IAF had aquired BVR technology but PAF fleet had not a single BVR missile. PAF first BVR capable platform was Jf-17 in 2008. Subsequently AMRAAMs were delivered in 2010 which outranged everything in IAF's arsenal. So this time Airforces are balanced and PAF even can dominate in various scenarios. According to indian Generals themselves, india was the strongest ever capability wise versus Pakistan during the kargil skirmish. That edge has gone now.
Click to expand...
Yaar, whenever the JF-17 comes up, it honestly feels irrelevant to us.

As an Indian, we mostly see only two real concerns — the J-10 and the F-16 Block 52. These are the two major strengths of the PAF that we actually take seriously.
 
The Sikh officers in the Bharati military are not to be provided sensitive info or put in sensitive positions, as per the leaked Bharti top secret documents! See the following presentation by Mubasser Lucman for details....

*"Karma" is a bitch! Thanks to the RAW ops in the East Pak via Mujib & Co, and its adverse effect on the Muslim officers from there, similar situation arrived in the Pak military during '71 fiasco and subsequent civil war.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 33 (members: 0, guests: 33)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top