Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Chinese Taian TAS5450 eight-wheel drive chassis.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Sorry bro this not MRLs these are missiles.
Fatah 3 and 4, with 450 and 700 km range? Even Russian Iskender doesn't has that range! Can we use these in current scenario? or just in total war!
 
According to Sami Abraham, the PAF pilots went inside Bharat with a Fidayin mission. They promised not to come back without hitting the targets. And, if they had failed they would have crashed the jets themselves without getting caught. Subhan'Allah....

As for the Air Chief, his stand was dead clear: no point in having a/c damaged at the bases. Get into the fight and take out as many bastards as possible....

Not sure I agree with this approach of success or death, i think it is flawed. A pilot that you have spent decades training is more valuable than a single mission. What target is worth that, or a $50-100milliont dollar jet aswell, esp when it can be used on so many more missions ? A pilot should fight until all his(/her) chances are spent, then they should return to base, get refills and go back out again. Japan failed in its war against the Americans, amongst many causes, one issue was that the Japanese had a warrior to the death mentality for their pilots and the Americans sent some of their best back to the training bases to train the next batch of fighter pilots.
 
Last edited:
What is nagging me is why didn't Pakistan use its tier 1 cruise missles like Raad and Babur when India was using Brahmos. What can be the strategic thought behind it? Can anyone provide insight on this? @Oscar @FuturePAF
@ghazi52
Slow.. and perhaps some low-moving objects were already successfully targeted?
I think we should better use them from seaside.
 
About the future, 1965 ended in favor of both but indians took advantage of 1971. 6 years later. For me pakistan armed forces should now arm to teeth for next 6 years could be anything india throw at us in next 6 years. Im no saint but next 6 years I have feeling they will attack in surprise.

To me india is like evil character of disney movie who just wants to see Pakistan burn.

🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
hmmn, you see the real strength of any nation is economy! economy, economy, economy.... for that you need stability!

until both things are on tracks then you can arm yourself to the teeth and still end up a looser. The Soviet Union was armed to the teeth. But economically it was a failure. Until Pakistan is stable and economically viable then your strength in armament means nothing.

Qatar is not militarily stronger than Pakistan for example or UAE but their economic policy made them a power house. Look at China too.

Until Pakistan has stability where peoples mandate is respected and the organs of the state operate in their designated role = no stability = no economy.
 
Indian DGMO press conference was weak AF.

No comment saaR. No comment saaR. No comment saaR. No comment saaR. Press conference over saaR.


lol
Pakistani press conference at 2200 PST.
Let's see.
 
"... regret now going to Trump for trying to de-escalate." Why? It's Modi who was begging Trump for an immediate ceasefire.
Because Trump has opened the field of intervention in this matter. India says there is no way but the highway when it comes to Kashmir. it will not tolerate outside intervention, or concerns over Kashmir. atut-ang is what they call it.

Trump putting a magnification glass on the Kashmir matter, is not what India wanted. India has done all sorts of gymnastics in diplomacy to make the matter of Kashmir one sided that favours India.

This tweet of Trump is not welcomed by them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top