Master Chief
Trusted Member
This is a moronic interpretation that neglects the facts and the timeline of events. The only significant damage done via Indian missile strikes was the last throw of the dice on the last day of the conflict when a ceasefire was being negotiated. You and I both know this yet you kowtow to this Indian propaganda that somehow "poor accuracy of Pakistani missiles stands exposed".
Until that point on the last day, a limited and selective response had been deployed from Pakistan to assert control without undue escalatory impact. Now we can discuss the pros and cons of ever addressing the hindutva menace with a "limited and selective" response - that deserves its own analysis; however, it is patently false to suggest that we have seen the best Pakistani missile assault that could be mustered. We clearly fought within ourselves to contain the escalatory effect.
A proper salvo of rockets and the utilisation of our as yet untouched high grade missiles would decimate Indian bases. There is little doubt in this reality. Note also how Vikrant turned tail and hid for 3 days after the IN paid western press to "declare" its triumphant arrival off the burnt out port of Karachi. This was not some lucky break but rather a response to a direct threat of sinking from PN and PAF. We jammed Rafales days before downing them. Vikrant was likely lit up by some method unknown to us simpletons and decided she did not want to go the same way as BS-001.
