Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Persian Gulf]

Trump has overpromised that he could quickly stop the Ukraine-Russia war, Israel-Gaza genocide, and reach a deal with Iran.

He has failed on all fronts. Iran should not give him an easy win.

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Israel continues to bark and threaten to attack Iran in their daily ritual which they have performed for the last 20 years

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[hyperman]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

this is a very foolish idea if Iran agreed to this.

 

[tsunset]

Bipolar Israel denies NYT report that Israel wants to attack Iran

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Watandar]

I think chances of an Israeli attack on Iran remain very high. Netanyahu has gotten away with everything so far so he probably thinks he can get away with attacking Iran as well, even if it may not have the desired results of dismantling Iran nuke program. His assessment that the US would still protect Israel from Iranian retaliation are correct, the last two years have cleared up any doubts that AIPAC/ADL effectively own the US congress and executive.

Another Israel-Iran tit for tat would effectively scuttle the current negotiations between Iran and international community for at least another 6 months too.

 

[Falcon29]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

this is a very foolish idea if Iran agreed to this.

They refuted report:
..
..

Iranian Foreign Ministry: Uranium enrichmentfor Iran is a non-negotiable principle, and what Reuters claimed is nothing but media rumors.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ShapurII]

I think chances of an Israeli attack on Iran remain very high. Netanyahu has gotten away with everything so far so he probably thinks he can get away with attacking Iran as well, even if it may not have the desired results of dismantling Iran nuke program. His assessment that the US would still protect Israel from Iranian retaliation are correct, the last two years have cleared up any doubts that AIPAC/ADL effectively own the US congress and executive.

Another Israel-Iran tit for tat would effectively scuttle the current negotiations between Iran and international community for at least another 6 months too.

I think the chance of sabotage is higher than the chance of a military strike.
Israel does not have the means to strike hardened targets deep inside Iranian territory. Tactical strikes here and there, yes. But Fordow, or even underground parts of Natanz like the FEP, are completely outside of Israel's capabilities.

 

[tsunset]

I think chances of an Israeli attack on Iran remain very high. Netanyahu has gotten away with everything so far so he probably thinks he can get away with attacking Iran as well, even if it may not have the desired results of dismantling Iran nuke program. His assessment that the US would still protect Israel from Iranian retaliation are correct, the last two years have cleared up any doubts that AIPAC/ADL effectively own the US congress and executive.

Another Israel-Iran tit for tat would effectively scuttle the current negotiations between Iran and international community for at least another 6 months too.

They cannot destroy a single Lebanese/Yemeni underground complex beside hitting their entrances which are repaired in not even days from the inside, they want to achieve their first underground complex successful strike deep inside Iran?

IADS will cook IAF in Pakistani-style performance if they plan on using bombs and not ALBMs pushed to their maximum range

 

[delta2]

Stupid mullas!

Just test your nuke and get it over with so that the world can move on, the Arabs scramble to build and test theirs too, so that the colonizers lose their sleep completely, pack up and move back to Europe so Paleatine can fnally breathe some fresh air. This will also greatly relieve pressure on Pakistan.

There is no down side to it.

The end of that racist evil entity will bring world peace!

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

this is a very foolish idea if Iran agreed to this.

US redline: zero enrichment in Iran.

Iran redline: legal right to enrichment for civilian purposes.

Compromise: Iran temporarily pauses enrichment for one year while US publicly accepts Iran's legal right to enrichment. Iran then resumes enrichment after one year having had its right to enrich recognised.

This seems like a better outcome for Iran than the US as it is the US that is ultimately backing down from its demand that Iran cannot enrich any uranium for any purpose.

But the Reuters articles claims this has not even been discussed at the talks yet and it is not clear that Iran would even accept a temporary pause in enrichment.

 

[Watandar]

They cannot destroy a single Lebanese/Yemeni underground complex beside hitting their entrances which are repaired in not even days from the inside, they want to achieve their first underground complex successful strike deep inside Iran?

IADS will cook IAF in Pakistani-style performance if they plan on using bombs and not ALBMs pushed to their maximum range

Israelis are irrational now, just look at Gaza. They might even attack something non-nuclear, like IRI leadership or energy infrastructure or missle related sites. They are very likely to do something that will make it very very hard for Iran not to respond, and the subsequent tit for tat will scuttle the nuke negotiations and broader rapproachment betwee Iran and international community.

My predictions are IRI leadership targeted via covert means and energy infrastructure via IAF.

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Clash Report proven to be totally unreliable as usual.

 

[ShapurII]

He has failed on all fronts. Iran should not give him an easy win.

Yeah, let's sacrifice our own national interests not to give him an easy win.
Let's continue to play the tough guy that has worked so wonderfully in favor of our economic and security interests so far.

 

[Persian Gulf]

Yeah, let's sacrifice our own national interests not to give him an easy win.
Let's continue to play the tough guy that has worked so wonderfully in favor of our economic and security interests so far.

Giving him an easy win is sacrificing our national interests.

Iran has never played the tough guy, we let Israel be the only nuclear state in the region, we let them kill our top scientists unanswered, we let them kill 5 Iranians in direct bombings unanswered ... etc. The revolutionary spirit of taking American diplomats hostage is long gone.

IRI took two years from when Trump withdrew from the JCPOA to start retaliating for god's sake.