Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

With Indian hostilities led by the RSS BJP Hindu fundamentalists group of trying to undermine and attack Pakistan under various false pretexts - Pakistan needs to support these groups, divide and conquer so that when they initiate a conflict it'll be easier to take Indian occupied Kashmir and give freedom to other suppressed/oppressed groups:

India has experienced several insurgencies since its independence in 1947, driven by ethnic, ideological, religious, and regional factors. Here's a list of the major insurgencies:

1. Naga Insurgency (Since 1956)

- Region:Nagaland and surrounding areas in Northeast India.
- Cause: Demand for an independent Naga homeland.
- Groups: National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN-IM, NSCN-K).
- Status: Ongoing peace talks with the Indian government; ceasefire agreements in place.

2. Mizo Insurgency (1966–1986)

- Region: Mizoram.
- Cause: Dissatisfaction with central response to famine; demand for independence.
- Group: Mizo National Front (MNF).
- Status: Ended with the 1986 Mizoram Peace Accord; MNF became a political party.

3. Naxalite–Maoist Insurgency (Since 1967)

- Region: Central and Eastern India (the "Red Corridor").
- Cause: Left-wing extremism; fight against perceived exploitation of tribal and rural populations.
- Groups: Communist Party of India (Maoist) and others.
- Status: Ongoing; significantly weakened but still active in some areas.

4. Khalistan Movement (1980s–1990s)

- Region: Punjab.
- Cause: Demand for a separate Sikh homeland, "Khalistan".
- Groups: Babbar Khalsa, Khalistan Commando Force, etc.
- Status: Largely suppressed by the mid-1990s; sporadic support from diaspora.

5. Kashmir Insurgency (Since 1989)

- Region: Jammu and Kashmir.
- Cause: Disputed status of Kashmir; demand for independence or merger with Pakistan.
- Groups: Hizbul Mujahideen, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed.
- Status: Ongoing; Article 370 abrogation in 2019 changed the political landscape.

6. Assam Insurgency (Since 1979)

- Region: Assam.
- Cause: Anti-immigrant sentiment; demand for sovereignty.
- Groups: United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA).
- Status: Weakened; many leaders have surrendered or joined peace talks.

7. Tripura Insurgency (1980s–2000s)

- Region: Tripura.
- Cause: Ethnic tensions between indigenous tribes and Bengali settlers.
- Groups: National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), All Tripura Tiger Force (ATTF).
- Status: Mostly dormant; peace restored through negotiations.

8. Gorkhaland Movement (Intermittent since 1980s)

- Region: Darjeeling and Kalimpong (West Bengal).
- Cause: Demand for a separate Gorkhaland state.
- Groups: Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM), Gorkha National Liberation Front (GNLF).
- Status: Political in nature; periodic unrest but no active insurgency.


In addition to the major insurgencies already listed, here are some lesser-known or regionally significant insurgencies in India:

9. Bodoland Insurgency

- Region: Assam (Bodoland Territorial Region).
- Cause: Demand for a separate Bodoland state for the Bodo people.
- Groups: Bodo Liberation Tigers (BLT), National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB).
- Status: Peace accords signed in 2003 and 2020; significant reduction in violence.

10. Manipur Insurgency

- Region: Manipur.
- Cause: Ethnic tensions and demand for independence or greater autonomy.
- Groups: People's Liberation Army (PLA), United National Liberation Front (UNLF), Kangleipak Communist Party (KCP).
- Status: Ongoing; intermittent violence and peace talks.

11. Meghalaya Insurgency

- Region: Meghalaya.
- Cause: Ethnic identity and autonomy for Khasi, Garo, and Jaintia tribes.
- Groups: Garo National Liberation Army (GNLA), Hynniewtrep National Liberation Council (HNLC).
- Status: Mostly subdued; sporadic incidents.

12. Karbi and Dimasa Insurgencies

- Region: Assam (Karbi Anglong and Dima Hasao districts).
- Cause: Ethnic identity and demand for separate states.
- Groups: United People's Democratic Solidarity (UPDS), Dima Halam Daogah (DHD).
- Status: Peace accords signed; groups disbanded or joined mainstream politics.

13. Tamil Nadu (LTTE Support)

- Region: Tamil Nadu.
- Cause: Sympathy and support for Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka.
- Groups: No active insurgency, but LTTE had support networks.
- Status: Dormant since LTTE's defeat in Sri Lanka (2009).

14. Adivasi Militancy in Jharkhand and Odisha

- Region: Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh.
- Cause: Tribal rights, land alienation, and exploitation.
- Groups: Jharkhand Liberation Tigers, People's Liberation Front of India (PLFI).
- Status: Often overlaps with Maoist insurgency; ongoing low-intensity conflict.

Pakistan needs to exploit/support/ignite these groups with moral support as the BJP Modi government has made things worse.

Security Approach:

The BJP-led government has taken a hardline stance on internal security, especially in Kashmir and against Maoists. This has led to reduced insurgent activity in some areas but also increased alienation in others.

- Kashmir:

The abrogation of Article 370 in 2019 was a landmark move. While it aimed to integrate Jammu & Kashmir more fully into India, it also led to heightened tensions, curfews, and communication blackouts. The long-term impact remains debated.

- Northeast: The BJP has pushed peace accords (e.g., with Bodo and Naga groups) and invested in infrastructure. However, ethnic tensions (like the 2023 Manipur violence) have raised concerns about governance and communal harmony.

- Criticism: Critics argue that the BJP's majoritarian politics and centralised decision-making have sometimes exacerbated regional grievances, especially among minorities and tribal communities.

Pakistan as part of its strategy needs to give moral support - weaken the cohesion of this hostile Indian nation. Whilst maintaining it's conventional capabilities of taking back Indian occupied Kashmir and thereby safeguarding it's waters.
Most of these groups are dead since decades now. They were at their peak in latest 1960-1990s.
Read your own summary from these texts - "disbanded, peace accord reached"

Peace accords are in place and the bigger groups have disbanded. NE doesn't have any active group which wants secession now.

Maoism is pretty much dead too. They used to be pretty big a couple of decades back in large parts of India.

Internally india did well to reach peace or destroy it's enemies. Maoists/Naxals, NE rebels etc.
 
Most of these groups are dead since decades now. They were at their peak in latest 1960-1990s.
Read your own summary from these texts - "disbanded, peace accord reached"

Peace accords are in place and the bigger groups have disbanded. NE doesn't have any active group which wants secession now.

Maoism is pretty much dead too.

Internally india did well to destroy it's enemies.
well tbf india would have alot of insurgencies as its so diverse and i think the only active movements right now are Khalistan Movement probably

But have you considered the Pahalgam attack couldve been done by a Kashmiri Insurgents instead of Pakistan?! Well modi needs to learn that
 
We definitely have the capability to jam brahmos, this was demonstrated with radar proof on May 11th conference

But what we need is a layered defense system. After HQ-19 we should get HQ-17. We should definitely have the idea of an iron wall defense in our minds
 
2019 & 2025 Pakistan listened to China and didn't escalated it much.

I wonder what is in Chinas plan... Taiwan first or Arunchal pardesh or kashmir & ladsakh first...

China will beat India first to deter US/western war over Taiwan. All signs point towards that. Once south tibet Zangnan and Kashmir issue is resolved Taiwan will join China peacefully.
 
China will beat India first to deter US/western war over Taiwan. All signs point towards that. Once south tibet Zangnan and Kashmir issue is resolved Taiwan will join China peacefully.
Isnt it kind of risky though since India has nukes and would surely nuke china
 
Stack up at least five S-400 batteries, that equal to one HQ-19, yes this how good it is and thinking it to be in Pakistan’s service:
We will literally control the airspace of even India’s West Bengal region.

Bloody fuckin yessss baby!
View attachment 126573

The thing many don't get is that Pakistan will get China weapons at special price. For India S400 cost was $6 billion. Russia likely spent $1 billion to make that.

Same with outrageous price of Rafale $288m per aircraft. While J-35 for Pakistan likely will not cost more then $30-35m.

We are finally at a stage where Chinese weapons are on par with USA and cost 6-7x less for Pakistan. Essentially eliminating the so called GDP/Economy gap between India and Pakistan when it comes to weapons procurement.

Battle tested weapons by Pakistan will make China biggest arms exporter in 5-10 years. Its win win situation.
 
China will beat India first to deter US/western war over Taiwan. All signs point towards that. Once south tibet Zangnan and Kashmir issue is resolved Taiwan will join China peacefully.
I very much doubt they want Arunachal Pradesh. It's optics over India claiming Aksai Chin and hosting Dalai Lama and Tibetan government in exile.

Taking Arunachal would mean a full blown war that would make Ukraine-Russia conflict look like a skirmish. Far too much to lose.

It's telling that the one of the 2 largest militarised nations on the earth use a no weapons policy on the border.

Even in 1962 and 1967 the Chinese always made sure to stop the conflict before it escalated into a larger war.
 
2019 & 2025 Pakistan listened to China and didn't escalated it much.

I wonder what is in Chinas plan... Taiwan first or Arunchal pardesh or kashmir & ladsakh first...
China has assessed significant weaknesses in india’s defense to the point that india had to rely only on brahmos/ other missile strikes…. Not looking good india if similar conflict to occur with china
 
  • Like
Reactions: TAC
For India IoK and Zangnan are not that big of a deal. They will only use nukes if mainland India is under existential threat.
so they dont consider North east to be mainland? And also isnt Iok effectively mainland now since their abrogation of 370 article?
 
China has assessed significant weaknesses in india’s defense to the point that india had to rely only on brahmos/ other missile strikes…. Not looking good india if similar conflict to occur with china
If we can beat India's a$$ this badly in a conflict that their IAF had to be grounded. i can only fathom what china will do
 
  • Like
Reactions: TAC
China has assessed significant weaknesses in india’s defense to the point that india had to rely only on brahmos/ other missile strikes…. Not looking good india if similar conflict to occur with china
Im thinking the reason. if its not trade that China hasnt invaded taiwan is due to India
 
For India IoK and Zangnan are not that big of a deal. They will only use nukes if mainland India is under existential threat.
I think you misunderstand, if IOK wasn't important India wouldn't have fought multiple wars and risked nuclear war over it.

It won't even even come to nukes. Nukes are just for optics. Mirv + Marv are essential to have as a surety to your sovereignty. But India has enough conventional stockpile.
 
I very much doubt they want Arunachal Pradesh. It's optics over India claiming Aksai Chin and hosting Dalai Lama and Tibetan government in exile.

Taking Arunachal would mean a full blown war that would make Ukraine-Russia conflict look like a skirmish. Far too much to lose.

It's telling that the one of the 2 largest militarised nations on the earth use a no weapons policy on the border.

Even in 1962 and 1967 the Chinese always made sure to stop the conflict before it escalated into a larger war.
a no nuclear policy means nothing honestly if a country's existence is threatened they would do anything to preserve itself
 
I very much doubt they want Arunachal Pradesh. It's optics over India claiming Aksai Chin and hosting Dalai Lama and Tibetan government in exile.

Taking Arunachal would mean a full blown war that would make Ukraine-Russia conflict look like a skirmish. Far too much to lose.

It's telling that the one of the 2 largest militarised nations on the earth use a no weapons policy on the border.

Even in 1962 and 1967 the Chinese always made sure to stop the conflict before it escalated into a larger war.

You mean to say if India give up claim on Aksai chin then they will forget about Zangnan? Maybe in 1950 that would have worked but instead India decided to go to war with China.

Its too late now. China isn't arming Pakistan to teeth for nothing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top