Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

I think you misunderstand, if IOK wasn't important India wouldn't have fought multiple wars and risked nuclear war over it.

It won't even even come to nukes. Nukes are just for optics. Mirv + Marv are essential to have as a surety to your sovereignty. But India has enough conventional stockpile.

India never fought a war with Pak+China combined forces. That will change status quo of Kashmir.
 
You mean to say if India give up claim on Aksai chin then they will forget about Zangnan? Maybe in 1950 that would have worked but instead India decided to go to war with China.

Its too late now. China isn't arming Pakistan to teeth for nothing.
No i meant that it's optics on both sides. I don't see a hot war taking place between India and China. India won't move for Aksai Chin neither China move for Arunachal Pradesh.

I don't think any of the highly militarised nuclear nations have a policy of not using weapons at the border. What does this signify?

At best they'll continue giving Pakistan their goodies to counter India.
 
No i meant that it's optics on both sides. I don't see a hot war taking place between India and China. India won't move for Aksai Chin neither China move for Arunachal Pradesh.

I don't think any of the highly militarised nuclear nations have a policy of not using weapons at the border. What does this signify?

At best they'll continue giving Pakistan their goodies to counter India.
sighhhh i just wish we could develop ourselves for a few years before being dragged into another conflict

But if China is laying claim like this i can at best see a skirmish happening

Didnt something like this happen back in 2020 too
 
HQ 19 will. Also be prime target for India just like s400 for Pakistan.
It's anti ballistic however I case of war they will rain BrahMos as well on it
India lacks significant mountain passes near the Pakistani border, while Pakistan’s geography offers a natural advantage with the mountainous regions of Balochistan, FATA, and Kashmir. These terrains can be used strategically to hide and protect our generated and affiliated drones, along with airborne surveillance systems, allowing us to monitor enemy movements with greater security.
The primary threat remains from Indian proxies, as seen in 2012–13 when they used terrorist operatives to destroy our airborne surveillance assets. Therefore, any new system must be heavily secured to avoid a similar fate.
Modern systems now provide a major advantage — with ranges of up to 4000 km, enabling deep penetration surveillance into Indian territory. Even if positioned deep within the northern mountains, Kashmir’s peaks, or remote Balochistan ranges, these systems can effectively monitor vast areas of enemy territory.
To ensure their protection during wartime, we must deploy decoy drones flying around these key assets, controlled through advanced artificial intelligence networks. These decoys will serve as both shields and distractions, providing a dynamic protective cover and significantly enhancing the survivability of our core surveillance systems during active conflict
 
doesnt india lay claim to tibet?
No. Tibet used to be a autonomous region in the past before China occupied it. India protested but didn't lay claim on it.

India's response was accepting Dalai Lama and Tibetan government in exile.

This led to 1962 war. Colossal military disaster for india. This was the wake up call for India this was the moment when rapid militarisation was done by India.

in 1967 Chinese withdrew and couldn't achieve their objectives so it was a tactical win for india.
 
India lacks significant mountain passes near the Pakistani border, while Pakistan’s geography offers a natural advantage with the mountainous regions of Balochistan, FATA, and Kashmir. These terrains can be used strategically to hide and protect our generated and affiliated drones, along with airborne surveillance systems, allowing us to monitor enemy movements with greater security.
The primary threat remains from Indian proxies, as seen in 2012–13 when they used terrorist operatives to destroy our airborne surveillance assets. Therefore, any new system must be heavily secured to avoid a similar fate.
Modern systems now provide a major advantage — with ranges of up to 4000 km, enabling deep penetration surveillance into Indian territory. Even if positioned deep within the northern mountains, Kashmir’s peaks, or remote Balochistan ranges, these systems can effectively monitor vast areas of enemy territory.
To ensure their protection during wartime, we must deploy decoy drones flying around these key assets, controlled through advanced artificial intelligence networks. These decoys will serve as both shields and distractions, providing a dynamic protective cover and significantly enhancing the survivability of our core surveillance systems during active conflict
U are living in 2010 then
All stationary targets are visible via satellites
 
U are living in 2010 then
All stationary targets are visible via satellites
I agree, they can be seen via satellite, but you can camouflage them as they are Mobile. Iranians and Palestinian came with the idea of underground tunnels to avoid American and Israeli satellites
 
China has assessed significant weaknesses in india’s defense to the point that india had to rely only on brahmos/ other missile strikes…. Not looking good india if similar conflict to occur with china
Next will be their navy
It will be all Out war if it has come to that. Because drowning any boat means drowning at least 70-100 ppl... Aircraft carrier has 4000+.

I guess Indian army realised their weaknesses but it's Indian politicians which makes the calls
 
Next will be their navy
It will be all Out war if it has come to that. Because drowning any boat means drowning at least 70-100 ppl... Aircraft carrier has 4000+.

I guess Indian army realised their weaknesses but it's Indian politicians which makes the calls
So now their Army and Air Force have proved incompetent so now they come with navy LOL
 
Most of these groups are dead since decades now. They were at their peak in latest 1960-1990s.
Read your own summary from these texts - "disbanded, peace accord reached"

Peace accords are in place and the bigger groups have disbanded. NE doesn't have any active group which wants secession now.

Maoism is pretty much dead too. They used to be pretty big a couple of decades back in large parts of India.

Internally india did well to reach peace or destroy it's enemies. Maoists/Naxals, NE rebels etc.
They are easy to reignite ...where there is a will there is a way. It was also to highlight that the potential for dissaray and disenfranchised groups are higher than other countries - If the RSS BJP Hindu fundamentalists are bent on having a 'NEW NORM' - then Pakistan needs to ensure that this Indian Extremist government is removed or destroyed to ensure that their is peace and harmony in the region.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top