PAF J-35AE - News, Updates and Discussions

MastanKhan said:
Hi,

So when was there a credible source that mentioned Paf had Pl15's---?
Click to expand...
That's my point. PAF doesn't announce anything. After 65 war one day in school a jet roars over our heads. It was a F-6. We were all looking at each other "when did this happen ".
 
ARMalik said:
You are just being cautious Deino. By the way, Chinese accounts on X seem to know you. Have a look at the comments - someone mentioned you. Apparently integration of PL-17 on J-10 has been DONE!:LOL:
Click to expand...
First of all, no one questions whether the J-10C can carry the "PL-17". But so far:
1. "PL-17" is just a civilian code, and the Chinese government has not confirmed the existence of the "PL-17". We just saw the J-16 carrying an air-to-air missile with a long unknown code. Chinese military fans speculated that its code was "PL-17", and the official agency did not confirm its authenticity.
2. We just saw a blurry picture of what might be the J-10C carrying the "PL-17". It is very controversial.
That's all.
I think what @Deino questioned was "Has the J-10C already carried the PL-17?", not "Can the J-10C carry the PL-17?".
For this suspected "PL-17" air-to-air missile, in today's PLAAF's systemized combat system, it doesn't matter who carries and launches it.

Secondly, @Deino is very well-known in Chinese military social media. Chinese military fans nicknamed him "小黄人" (from his Twitter profile picture "Minions"). He is known for his "rigorousness". Most rational Chinese military fans are his fans. Of course, there are some Chinese nationalists who criticize him. But I think most of the criticism against him in the Chinese media comes from misunderstandings caused by cultural differences between us, rather than the original intentions of each other.

MastanKhan said:
FC31 was primarily built for pakistan to be the first customer---.
Click to expand...
What else can you do besides chattering nonsense?

PAF is an important international customer of AVIC.
But it is still in the category of "international customers" and can never enter the category of "insiders".
 
Last edited:
Michael said:
First of all, no one questions whether the J-10C can carry the "PL-17". But so far:
1. "PL-17" is just a civilian code, and the Chinese government has not confirmed the existence of the "PL-17". We just saw the J-16 carrying an air-to-air missile with a long unknown code. Chinese military fans speculated that its code was "PL-17", and the official agency did not confirm its authenticity.
2. We just saw a blurry picture of what might be the J-10C carrying the "PL-17". It is very controversial.
That's all.
I think what @Deino questioned was "Has the J-10C already carried the PL-17?", not "Can the J-10C carry the PL-17?".
For this suspected "PL-17" air-to-air missile, in today's PLAAF's systemized combat system, it doesn't matter who carries and launches it.

Secondly, @Deino is very well-known in Chinese military social media. Chinese military fans nicknamed him "小黄人" (from his Twitter profile picture "Minions"). He is known for his "rigorousness". Most rational Chinese military fans are his fans. Of course, there are some Chinese nationalists who criticize him. But I think most of the criticism against him in the Chinese media comes from misunderstandings caused by cultural differences between us, rather than the original intentions of each other.
Click to expand...
What limits j-10c or prevents it from not carrying PL-17?
 
Abdul q said:
What limits j-10c or prevents it from not carrying PL-17?
Click to expand...
Is there something wrong with my translation software? Or did you not read this carefully at all?

Official statement: As of now, the "PL-17" does not exist. ------ China has a new air-to-air missile being tested by the military on the J-16. Chinese military fans call it the "PL-17", but the official agency has not officially announced it.

Can the J-10C carry the "PL-17"? It doesn't matter.

1. Based on the information currently revealed on social media, the range of the PL-17 exceeds the working distance of the radar of any fighter (except the latest 6th-Gen fighter). This means that if it is launched at maximum range, then it will not be able to be independently guided by any fighter.
2. Based on the previous rule, it can be carried by any aircraft as long as the aircraft can meet the basic launch conditions.
 
Too little, too late,

IAF will field the AMRC soon.

You may laugh at the Tejas, but at least it was built with dignity, without stolen IP, by hard-working engineers and scientists. Indians have some of the best engineering talents in the world.

For example, the Tejas uses a higher % of composite material than even the J-20, and, most likely, even the J-36.

VEM technology of Hyderabad is the most advanced composite materials technology centre in Asia. They managed to reduce the weight of the Su-30MKI by as much as 32%. Chinese Flankers are actually heavier than even Soviet era Su-27UB models because Chinese composite technology is behind that of even 80s USSR, and much behind that of China. Therefore, the Indian Su-30MKI is both lighter, faster, and can carry more payload than J-15, J-16.
 
ZhejiangRedneck said:
Too little, too late,

IAF will field the AMRC soon.

You may laugh at the Tejas, but at least it was built with dignity, without stolen IP, by hard-working engineers and scientists. Indians have some of the best engineering talents in the world.

For example, the Tejas uses a higher % of composite material than even the J-20, and, most likely, even the J-36.

VEM technology of Hyderabad is the most advanced composite materials technology centre in Asia. They managed to reduce the weight of the Su-30MKI by as much as 32%. Chinese Flankers are actually heavier than even Soviet era Su-27UB models because Chinese composite technology is behind that of even 80s USSR, and much behind that of China. Therefore, the Indian Su-30MKI is both lighter, faster, and can carry more payload than J-15, J-16.
Click to expand...
And still these lighter and faster capable to carry more load falling from sky like dead birds.
 
ZhejiangRedneck said:
Too little, too late,

IAF will field the AMRC soon.

You may laugh at the Tejas, but at least it was built with dignity, without stolen IP, by hard-working engineers and scientists. Indians have some of the best engineering talents in the world.

For example, the Tejas uses a higher % of composite material than even the J-20, and, most likely, even the J-36.

VEM technology of Hyderabad is the most advanced composite materials technology centre in Asia. They managed to reduce the weight of the Su-30MKI by as much as 32%. Chinese Flankers are actually heavier than even Soviet era Su-27UB models because Chinese composite technology is behind that of even 80s USSR, and much behind that of China. Therefore, the Indian Su-30MKI is both lighter, faster, and can carry more payload than J-15, J-16.
Click to expand...
Dude… when will indians evolve?? This bs i have been seeing since i was teenager on this mfing forum…India doesn’t seem to stop producing retards at sny lower pace since then
 
By Dr. Swami Sri Sri Chandrashekaran POOjavathi

Discovery of composite material of the decade, the Vibranium Enhanced Hypoeutectic metastable condensed matter Bharatium alloy metal matrix composite. This wonder material can significantly reduce weight, increase load factor (more G-force), and reduce X-band radar cross section by over 40% (precise value is state secret).

It uses nanotweaked "Charka" particles which enhance molecular bonds under stress. 30% stronger than graphene-weave composites, while weighing less than aerogel.

Quantum stealth coating, another masterpiece by our talent research engineer, POOnam Karthikeyan, leverages entangled PhOOton dispersions, absorbs radar waves across multiple frequencies. Reducing RCS by an additional 45%

Why J-20 can't compete:

1) Indian indigenous airframes made with advanced next gen composites developed by VEM taknology can possess negative mass properties. Giving it superior supersonic performance between mach 1.5-1.6

2) AMRC is being developed with the most powerful wind tunnel in the world

3) AMRC will be fitted with a DRDO-developed "YHOGYK" interference pattern generator (patent pending)

4) Special coating technology developed in the Varanase Institute for Advance Studies of Bovine excrement
 

Attachments

  • 1749535994641.png
    1749535994641.png
    97.8 KB · Views: 8
ZhejiangRedneck said:
By Dr. Swami Sri Sri Chandrashekaran POOjavathi

Discovery of composite material of the decade, the Vibranium Enhanced Hypoeutectic metastable condensed matter Bharatium alloy metal matrix composite. This wonder material can significantly reduce weight, increase load factor (more G-force), and reduce X-band radar cross section by over 40% (precise value is state secret).

It uses nanotweaked "Charka" particles which enhance molecular bonds under stress. 30% stronger than graphene-weave composites, while weighing less than aerogel.

Quantum stealth coating, another masterpiece by our talent research engineer, POOnam Karthikeyan, leverages entangled PhOOton dispersions, absorbs radar waves across multiple frequencies. Reducing RCS by an additional 45%

Why J-20 can't compete:

1) Indian indigenous airframes made with advanced next gen composites developed by VEM taknology can possess negative mass properties. Giving it superior supersonic performance between mach 1.5-1.6

2) AMRC is being developed with the most powerful wind tunnel in the world

3) AMRC will be fitted with a DRDO-developed "YHOGYK" interference pattern generator (patent pending)

4) Special coating technology develope in the Varanase Institute for Advance Studies of Bovine excrement
Click to expand...
@Musings i think troll my past just had ‘’puna janam’’ can you please send him back to slums…
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 12 (members: 0, guests: 12)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top