Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

You haven’t changed much have you?

A genocide in Gaza has been live streamed for over a year and Israel has refused to implement the UNSC resolutions on a two state solution and has been massacring and terrorizing Palestinians since 1948, but you want to blame Muslims for ‘terrorizing non Muslims’.
Good to see you Agno .
 
Did you listen to what trump said at the lawn:
View attachment 129116
Very Very interesting choice of words...
No. Too early in the morning to get my blood pressure jacked up. Still working on the first pot of coffee as well.

I'm sure I can catch the snippet a little later.
 
We are paranoid. A rogue state like Israel is allowed to brandish its nukes and goes around bullying and terrorising the region - yet this genocide state is allowed to keep them?
Its seems when it comes to Israel - all animals are equal BUT some are more equal than others.
The USA electorate, largely, has accepted the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state. The machinations of various Palestinian groups, such as Hamas, and their supporters, such as Iran, have refused to accept Israel in the sense that they will cease trying to destroy it. Until the USA electorate changes its mind about Israel's "right to exist" it will not be seen as a "rogue state" for its actions to protect itself. Even the terrible destruction and death in Gaza is not seen as "genocide" by the majority of Americans but rather as a terrible "cost of war". Americans cannot understand why the actions of Israel in Gaza are seen by some as "genocide" but the actions of Russia in the Ukraine are not, by the same people. The crux of the matter is whether or not Israel's right to exist can be accepted, even though it may be the unjust result of 20th century big power politics, which were largely European but also included the Ottomans.
 
If necessary? What exactly are they waiting for, US involvement?

Hezbollah is done for. They shouldn’t have invested time in attacking Muslims all across Syria fighting for a ruthless alawite dictator
They're done for because that "ruthless dictator" fell and all the supply routes fell with him, keeping Assad was extremely necessary for their survival. Now they're isolated.
 
Mediation talks possibly - refer to this headline 2 days ago:
I think so too. Airspace opens.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
No. Too early in the morning to get my blood pressure jacked up. Still working on the first pot of coffee as well.

I'm sure I can catch the snippet a little later.
I am paraphrasing here:
Trump: I may or may not strike nuclear facilities, and Iran should have negotiated with us previously.
Trump: It's too late, but there's still time to stop the war.
Trump: I've had enough of Iran. I want unconditional surrender.
Trump: Next week will be decisive regarding Iran, and it may happen before the end of the week.

Now add to this little cheeky slip of the tongue:
1750256922559.png

And there we have it.
 
I think so too. Airspace opens.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Yep, hopefully no sanctions and no nuclear program in the country but we can move towards Pakistan and China, build up our military for round 2 with Israel and US in a couple of years.
 
See, the paranoia exhibited by your above post is a large part of the problem between the "West" and political Islam. The "Muslim world" is not under attack by anyone. To live in peace, all the "Muslim world", including "the Axis of Resistance" states and entities, has to do is stop terrorizing non-Muslims. Because of what al Qaeda did to the USA on September 11, 2001, the USA will never trust a radical Islamic group to control nuclear weapons or materials. We now accept, warily, Pakistan having such weapons. We might also accept other Muslim nations to have them, such as Turkey or Egypt. But the Shia Muslim nation of Iran has been chanting "Death to America" since 1979. No responsible American President will accept a nuclear Iran led by such as Ayatollah Khamenei. The "Muslim world" is not an enemy of the USA, nor does it have anything to fear if the USA destroys Iran's nuclear weapons facilities.

The USA electorate, largely, has accepted the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state. The machinations of various Palestinian groups, such as Hamas, and their supporters, such as Iran, have refused to accept Israel in the sense that they will cease trying to destroy it. Until the USA electorate changes its mind about Israel's "right to exist" it will not be seen as a "rogue state" for its actions to protect itself. Even the terrible destruction and death in Gaza is not seen as "genocide" by the majority of Americans but rather as a terrible "cost of war". Americans cannot understand why the actions of Israel in Gaza are seen by some as "genocide" but the actions of Russia in the Ukraine are not, by the same people. The crux of the matter is whether or not Israel's right to exist can be accepted, even though it may be the unjust result of 20th century big power politics, which were largely European but also included the Ottomans.

Can a mod please ban this Indian scum @RescueRanger
 
America imo wont enter directly into the war. Having said they are de facto there anyways. Israel without American weapons and money would be not much more than Jordan or syria. What I think most likely and worrying that America may supply Israel the bunker busters. Israel could use these as a face saving exercise use them and say mission accomplished
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top