'We didn't attack the nation of Iran, only their nuclear program'
WOW, so I guess if someone attacks the US nuclear sites that shouldn't be an issue, its not really an attack on America it seems. I never thought of it this way, thank you for opening my eyes to this fact.
How is this a good observation? In what way could you possibly describe hyper-capitalist Israel as “Bolshevik”? And the lame implication that Jews somehow conspired to bring on World War 2 is the sort of conspiracy nonsense that gives anti-Zionism a bad name.
IAEA Director Rafael Grossi states Iran has material for nuclear warheads but no proof of weapons program, advocating for diplomatic solutions amid Israel's military strikes.
www.foxnews.com
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi said, "We have confirmed that Iran does have, even now, enough material for several warheads.
"But this should not be equated with a nuclear weapon," Grossi continued, adding, "We do not have at this point, if you ask me, at this time, any tangible proof that there is a program, or a plan, to fabricate, to manufacture a nuclear weapon."
The minimum U-235 concentration level for energy production is %3-5. That is all.
The required U-235 concentration for a nuclear warhead, as in UNCONTROLLED FISSION is at least %90.
Can we use %50 U-235 concentration for energy? Yes, but why? What is the point of expending greater financial resources to go past %5 just for energy? Common sense says no reasons at all.
US aircraft carriers and SSBN subs have %90 U-235 concentration in their reactors. Why?
Because the greater the concentration, the smaller the U-235 mass, and on ships, internal space is premium. So if the USN can get energy from a smallest possible mass of U-235 for their ships, we will do so, and we did. In other words, each US aircraft carrier and a SSBN sub is essentially a potential nuclear warhead.
What this means is that the IAEA chief is deceiving everyone. Beyond %5 concentration, there are two reasons:
- Ships
- Nuclear warheads
We know that Iran is not developing nuclear powered aircraft carriers and subs. That leaves nuclear warheads. So for Grossi to say that there is no proof of a nuclear WEAPONS program is absurd. That greater than %5 concentration is itself evidence.
Interactive nuclear enrichment and SWU calculator where you can enter a given feed or product mass and a product enrichment and it will tell you how much feed and SWU you need, and what the fuel will cost. Also plots results interactively as you go.
whatisnuclear.com
If all Iran want is to be a nuclear energy state, the UN would provide. JPN and SKR are nuclear states, but not nuclear weapons states, even though EVERYONE, from the lowly nuclear sub reactor tech to the highest nuclear scientist, know that both countries can become nuclear weapons states in short order. Faster than Iran can.
……trumps people said they didn’t want the bomb…..but yeah I will go with grossi and trumps of intelligence agencies that said just before this war they were not seeking the bomb and khameni didn’t approve of a thing but thanks for toning it down I actually read your whole post this time. Agree or disagree with each other we shouldn’t be attempting to attack people for their views but yeah the only one pushing that Iran was going nuclear was the Israelis trump just thought he would go for a victory lap afterwards I’m thinking it just made things worse for Americans be they soldiers or maybe even civilians and if that happens we go to war in a country bigger than Iraq or Afghanistan we are going to be screwed for the next 20 years or more
i think all this was done by Satanyahu so he can avoid the corruption trials and losing his power. And by forcing the americans into war again he also tries weakening them (due to financial bills all these ops will create and add to the debt ceiling)...
Although there is still no question as to the massive Navel and Air Superiority of the US even 11000 kms from their own soil.....they were truly unchallenged even now.
What will be Iran's response to satanyahu !! Why is that evil still alive
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
www.foxnews.com
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi said, "We have confirmed that Iran does have, even now, enough material for several warheads."But this should not be equated with a nuclear weapon," Grossi continued, adding, "We do not have at this point, if you ask me, at this time, any tangible proof that there is a program, or a plan, to fabricate, to manufacture a nuclear weapon."
whatisnuclear.com
