That make no sense.
Here is your source...
IAEA Director Rafael Grossi states Iran has material for nuclear warheads but no proof of weapons program, advocating for diplomatic solutions amid Israel's military strikes.
www.foxnews.com
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi said, "We have confirmed that Iran does have, even now, enough material for several warheads.
"But this should not be equated with a nuclear weapon," Grossi continued, adding, "We do not have at this point, if you ask me, at this time, any tangible proof that there is a program, or a plan, to fabricate, to manufacture a nuclear weapon."
The minimum U-235 concentration level for energy production is %3-5. That is all.
The required U-235 concentration for a nuclear warhead, as in
UNCONTROLLED FISSION is at least %90.
Can we use %50 U-235 concentration for energy? Yes, but why? What is the point of expending greater financial resources to go past %5 just for energy? Common sense says no reasons at all.
US aircraft carriers and SSBN subs have %90 U-235 concentration in their reactors. Why?
Because the greater the concentration, the smaller the U-235 mass, and on ships, internal space is premium. So if the USN can get energy from a smallest possible mass of U-235 for their ships, we will do so, and we did. In other words, each US aircraft carrier and a SSBN sub is essentially a potential nuclear warhead.
What this means is that the IAEA chief is deceiving everyone. Beyond %5 concentration, there are two reasons:
- Ships
- Nuclear warheads
We know that Iran is not developing nuclear powered aircraft carriers and subs. That leaves nuclear warheads. So for Grossi to say that there is no proof of a nuclear
WEAPONS program is absurd. That greater than %5 concentration is itself evidence.
Here...
Interactive nuclear enrichment and SWU calculator where you can enter a given feed or product mass and a product enrichment and it will tell you how much feed and SWU you need, and what the fuel will cost. Also plots results interactively as you go.
whatisnuclear.com
If all Iran want is to be a nuclear energy state, the UN would provide. JPN and SKR are nuclear states, but not nuclear weapons states, even though
EVERYONE, from the lowly nuclear sub reactor tech to the highest nuclear scientist, know that both countries can become nuclear weapons states in short order. Faster than Iran can.
Grossi is lying to us all.
