Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

What China can do instead is to resupply Iran in the meantime. I don't know how open or active they are in seeking to re-up critical defense articles. They have working borders and they can and should seek critical support personnel... perhaps here Pakistan and Turkiye may also be useful. Stabilizing Iran here must be the goal here... the collective will always keep shoring up zion with all they got to the point of self harm.
Since the collective is also running short on some of the supplies such as interceptors it is in their interest to wrap this up as quickly as possible. They cannot drag it on especially when ground invasion is not possible and aerial assault has a built in cost associated with it... so here China can certainly make a decisive difference without boots on the ground.

China is certainly not going to cut off supplies, and the Pakistani government has been very clear in blaming Israel for the attack on Iran. The attitude of the two countries is clear, Iran doesn't have to worry about the east.

The Iranian government should clean out its internal spies and surrenderists first. It is the uncertainty of the Iranian government's behavior due to the surrender faction within the Iranian government that is the most important reason for Iran's isolation, because there is no way for other countries to trust you.

Resist to the end and show the world the courage and determination of the Iranians. Only then will the shame of the Iranian government's abandonment of its allies, such as Hamas, Lebanese Hezbollah, and the Syrian government, be washed away.

Trump wouldn't dare send ground troops, foreign trade wouldn't be cut off, and resistance isn't really that difficult.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I was listening to the IAEA Chief's (I think) interview and he was saying that Iranians usually claim their Supreme Leader has given a Fatwa denouncing nuclear weapons, but at the same time Iranian senior leadership keeps saying and/or indicating they have all the knowledge, skill set and material to build nuclear weapons. This then forces the IAEA to be suspicious of Iran and IAEA is expected to increase their inspections which the Iranians then resist.
All this gets reported and it goes against Iran.
So, why can't the Iranian leadership just keep quiet rather than brag about something they obviously don't have?

Right! This is what Scott Ritter too complained about just a few weeks ago about the unnecessary wishy-washy posture by the Iranians on their nukes. Compare that with Pakistan: Pakistan started its nuclear weapons program in late January 1972 when Zulfi Bhutto, a month after the Fall of Dhaka in December 1971, thought that Pakistan must have the nukes to counter India in future. The program accelerated when India tested its nukes a few years alter. But Pakistan kept a consistent public stance: Pakistan's nuclear program is for 'peaceful, civilian' purposes and Pakistan kept that public stance right up to May 1998: That's almost three decades of secrecy and consistency!
 
Iran should also fire some missiles at Cyprus. The bases there are actively being used by multiple countries to support operations against Iran and it serves as a safe haven for tankers and Israeli assets
 
Any source available?

Farsnews is semi official news agency of IRGC ....



 
Bro... You are missing the point- This is a SYMBOLIC attack. It means nothing.
I agree with you on the 'Symbolic' part. But I would hardly refer to it as "an attack".

More like a half hearted or half-assed attempt.

Plus the only reason why the Iranians gave a heads up was because there is a LOT - and I mean A LOT of low-level flights taking off & landing in that area (Qatar/Bahrain).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top