There was no need for overwhelming missile assaults.
Yeah, right. No need at all. Did we witness the same war?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There was no need for overwhelming missile assaults.
That's exactly the point. Not only would there be a need for more CAP aircraft in addition to more refueling aircraft, in addition to trying to invade an airspace (Syria and Iraq) that might not be permissive because the IRIAF/IRGC-ASF could try to ambush the entire IAF strike package in both Iraq and Syria and they don't even need quantity, they only need small units to try to defend themselves, because it would force the Israelis to plan a much more complex operation than the one that has been carried out since June 13th.BVR missiles are heavier than AIM-9, so if there is a prospect of a BVR fight, then fewer platforms could operate over Iran, due to the need to provide more refuelling to each plane to get to Iran.
The Achilles heel of IAF operation was its and German/RAF tankers. That is why I think a stealth coupled with a long range AWACS platform will neutralise the IAF entirely if Iran can get a platform.
Another Israel narrative supporter.They need to hang this Mother F****r and his cabinet!!!
Another one who knew nothingHe is even 100 times worse than Rouhani.
China is not even interested in such a relationship to begin with. We offered it to you, you showed no interest in it. So, obviously, nobody said China would be begging for it.I don't think China will be likely begging for relation from Iran esp strategically in that case.
From now on, if Khamenei is not a wimp, the Iranian nuclear program must be completely militarized.While I find the article on diluting interesting. It is still a false equivalence and the argument does not hold. While I do not disagree that dilution is much easier, you have to remember as well that that project was spread across continents, involved inter-governmental agreements, IAEA oversight, shipping logistics, and safe handling over time, not urgency. Iran, by contrast, is likely operating in a tightly controlled, centralized, and high priority military-industrial context, potentially with far fewer procedural slowdowns.
ATTENTION :
That means the Iranian nuclear project, from now on, will no longer be selected by ANYONE. In the entire world, no one will know what is really happening there.
A 5 meter wide crater appeared at Natanz, so the attack may have been 7 B-2 Spirits.Bullshit from the very first minute he starts his so-called analysis.
There were only 6 GBU57-s launched. 3 B-2s flew over Iran, each carrying 2 GBU-57s. And that fully explains the 6 holes we see in the satellite imagery. Anything else is fantasy.
could you explain that in bit detail, I cant understand what you have said!Trump reveals what i feared most that the higher ranked positions in iran is infiltered by traitors.. He Said agents went inside Fordow after US strikes and Israel tried to walk that intel leak by trump back by hiding their assets but it didn´t work
Now you also don't like the holy SU-35I have no objections to Iran purchasing JF-17s. Iran needs to rebuild its air fleet and JF-17s are a good candidate but what Iran needs more is J-35s and Awacs!
how that official in the background passed away?Let not forget that at the time of these those infiltration happened
I haven't seen that photo, but if you say so, and I trust you on this based on your history of posts, then yes. It is plausible.A 5 meter wide crater appeared at Natanz, so the attack may have been 7 B-2 Spirits.
My other theory could be that trump didn't actually want to do the attack, but was pressured by AIPAC so he ordered a symbolic attack to get them off his back.I haven't seen that photo, but if you say so, and I trust you on this based on your history of posts, then yes. It is plausible.
However, that could also mean 4 B-2 spirits were used.
My problem with the Trump administration is that nothing they say is reliable. It all just sounds like they're constantly wh0ring for attention. They constantly contradict themselves.
One question is still unanswered. Why is the FEP at Natanz not obliterated yet? The US had the capacity to obliterate it easily, but many reports claim that it hasn't been destroyed. It was totally doable for the US to fully destroy the FEP, if not Fordow.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.