Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

BVR missiles are heavier than AIM-9, so if there is a prospect of a BVR fight, then fewer platforms could operate over Iran, due to the need to provide more refuelling to each plane to get to Iran.

The Achilles heel of IAF operation was its and German/RAF tankers. That is why I think a stealth coupled with a long range AWACS platform will neutralise the IAF entirely if Iran can get a platform.
That's exactly the point. Not only would there be a need for more CAP aircraft in addition to more refueling aircraft, in addition to trying to invade an airspace (Syria and Iraq) that might not be permissive because the IRIAF/IRGC-ASF could try to ambush the entire IAF strike package in both Iraq and Syria and they don't even need quantity, they only need small units to try to defend themselves, because it would force the Israelis to plan a much more complex operation than the one that has been carried out since June 13th.

Israel certainly wouldn't have that freedom, especially considering that the refueling routes are much easier to identify, which could force the IRIAF/IRGC-ASF to ambush the strike package, regardless of whether Iran suffered a surprise attack, but with aircraft that had survived the first attack, the IAF would be operating with much more difficulty.

Of course, AWACS and stealth aircraft for the IRIAF/IRGC-ASF would be even better.
 
They need to hang this Mother F****r and his cabinet!!!
Another Israel narrative supporter.

بشنوید از چرایی مذاکره و توقف وعده صادق۳/ فرمانده سابق سپاه حفاظت رهبری و مشاور فعلی فرمانده سپاه:

آن کسی که علی‌رغم مطالبه فرماندهان، مانع انجام وعده صادق‌۳ شد، رهبر عزیز بودند و آن کسی که تصمیم به مذاکره غیر مستقیم گرفت، خود شخص رهبر انقلاب بود...
 
I don't think China will be likely begging for relation from Iran esp strategically in that case.
China is not even interested in such a relationship to begin with. We offered it to you, you showed no interest in it. So, obviously, nobody said China would be begging for it.
 
While I find the article on diluting interesting. It is still a false equivalence and the argument does not hold. While I do not disagree that dilution is much easier, you have to remember as well that that project was spread across continents, involved inter-governmental agreements, IAEA oversight, shipping logistics, and safe handling over time, not urgency. Iran, by contrast, is likely operating in a tightly controlled, centralized, and high priority military-industrial context, potentially with far fewer procedural slowdowns.
From now on, if Khamenei is not a wimp, the Iranian nuclear program must be completely militarized.

I speak as a Brazilian because Brazil gave up the nuclear bomb (in the process of redemocratization) and passed it to civilian control, and our nuclear program was completely destroyed, including the civilian program that is advancing at a snail's pace.

What Iran should do now is that since there was a military attack on its nuclear facilities, the Iranians should completely militarize the nuclear program.
 
ATTENTION :

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


That means the Iranian nuclear project, from now on, will no longer be selected by ANYONE. In the entire world, no one will know what is really happening there.

Its the overall of the law that get approved.
Its a two priority law , the detail be discussed in weeks after that it must go to guardian council

After that if approved it will be law and even then it left everything to the whim of SNSC.
 
Bullshit from the very first minute he starts his so-called analysis.
There were only 6 GBU57-s launched. 3 B-2s flew over Iran, each carrying 2 GBU-57s. And that fully explains the 6 holes we see in the satellite imagery. Anything else is fantasy.
A 5 meter wide crater appeared at Natanz, so the attack may have been 7 B-2 Spirits.
 
Trump reveals what i feared most that the higher ranked positions in iran is infiltered by traitors.. He Said agents went inside Fordow after US strikes and Israel tried to walk that intel leak by trump back by hiding their assets but it didn´t work
could you explain that in bit detail, I cant understand what you have said!
 
I have no objections to Iran purchasing JF-17s. Iran needs to rebuild its air fleet and JF-17s are a good candidate but what Iran needs more is J-35s and Awacs!
Now you also don't like the holy SU-35
 
Iran has the victory here i think, Israel set out to completely destroy iran's nuclear programme but they failed to destroy any facilities from what i have seen.

USA aswell failed in their Operation, they should have came with more bombs, now when CNN with that source leaked that the Operation didn't do much damage, trump and his goons deflected by saying it was a "low level loser" calling your servicemen that is absolutely shameful.

Iran just showed these zionists are not invincible and that they can be hit, iran demonstrated that by penetrating deep in their territory, making 1/3 of tel aviv into gaza, hitting other cities like Haifa and Bat Yam and also Jerusalem(this one was crazy as its a holy city!)


While iran's problems were the moles, they were the biggest problems and iran should clean em out asap, deport afghans, and revoke visa free status of indians after what they did to iran.
 
A 5 meter wide crater appeared at Natanz, so the attack may have been 7 B-2 Spirits.
I haven't seen that photo, but if you say so, and I trust you on this based on your history of posts, then yes. It is plausible.
However, that could also mean 4 B-2 spirits were used.

My problem with the Trump administration is that nothing they say is reliable. It all just sounds like they're constantly wh0ring for attention. They constantly contradict themselves.

One question is still unanswered. Why is the FEP at Natanz not obliterated yet? The US had the capacity to obliterate it easily, but many reports claim that it hasn't been destroyed. It was totally doable for the US to fully destroy the FEP, if not Fordow.
 
I haven't seen that photo, but if you say so, and I trust you on this based on your history of posts, then yes. It is plausible.
However, that could also mean 4 B-2 spirits were used.

My problem with the Trump administration is that nothing they say is reliable. It all just sounds like they're constantly wh0ring for attention. They constantly contradict themselves.

One question is still unanswered. Why is the FEP at Natanz not obliterated yet? The US had the capacity to obliterate it easily, but many reports claim that it hasn't been destroyed. It was totally doable for the US to fully destroy the FEP, if not Fordow.
My other theory could be that trump didn't actually want to do the attack, but was pressured by AIPAC so he ordered a symbolic attack to get them off his back.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top